氯胺酮联合帕瑞昔布多模式先发制人镇痛与氯胺酮单用在择期剖腹手术中的比较。

Q3 Medicine
Rabiatul Aida Ramli, Wan Mohd Nazaruddin Wan Hassan, Saedah Ali, Abdul Karim Othman, Rhendra Hardy Mohamad Zaini, Mohamad Hasyizan Hassan
{"title":"氯胺酮联合帕瑞昔布多模式先发制人镇痛与氯胺酮单用在择期剖腹手术中的比较。","authors":"Rabiatul Aida Ramli,&nbsp;Wan Mohd Nazaruddin Wan Hassan,&nbsp;Saedah Ali,&nbsp;Abdul Karim Othman,&nbsp;Rhendra Hardy Mohamad Zaini,&nbsp;Mohamad Hasyizan Hassan","doi":"10.6859/aja.202112_59(4).0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preemptive analgesia is important for reducing postoperative analgesia requirement. Therefore, this study compared the efficacy of intravenous (IV) ketamine alone with the efficacy of a combination of low-dose IV ketamine and IV parecoxib as part of a multimodal preemptive analgesia regimen in patients undergoing elective laparotomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective study, 48 patients scheduled for elective laparotomy were randomized to two groups of preemptive analgesia, namely, group K-P, in which anestheologists administered a combination of 0.3 mg/kg IV ketamine and 40.0 mg IV parecoxib, or group K, in which ones gave 0.3 mg/kg IV ketamine alone. Patients from both groups underwent surgery under general anesthesia, and total intraoperative opioid requirement was recorded. After surgery, morphine administered by automated patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) infusion device was initiated in all patients. Pain score was assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS), and postoperative opioid requirement was recorded at 1 and 4 hours, and subsequently from 4-hour intervals up to 24 hours after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to group K, group K-P required significantly lower rescue IV fentanyl in the recovery bay (0.10 ± 0.28 vs. 0.35 ± 0.46 μg/kg; P = 0.031), showing prolonged time-to-first analgesic request recorded by PCA device (70.8 ± 40.0 vs. 22.2 ± 15.8 mins; P < 0.001), lower total morphine requirement delivered by PCA device (8.0 ± 4.6 vs. 16.8 ± 6.5 mg; P < 0.001), and lower VAS values measured at all time points. There was no significant difference in intraoperative total opioid requirement between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among laparotomy patients, multimodal preemptive analgesia by the use of a combination of low-dose IV ketamine and IV parecoxib was more effective than IV ketamine alone in reducing pain scores and postoperative analgesia requirement (e.g., PCA-administered morphine).</p>","PeriodicalId":8482,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of anesthesiology","volume":"59 4","pages":"161-168"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Combination Between Ketamine and Parecoxib as Multimodal Preemptive Analgesia With Ketamine Alone for Elective Laparotomy.\",\"authors\":\"Rabiatul Aida Ramli,&nbsp;Wan Mohd Nazaruddin Wan Hassan,&nbsp;Saedah Ali,&nbsp;Abdul Karim Othman,&nbsp;Rhendra Hardy Mohamad Zaini,&nbsp;Mohamad Hasyizan Hassan\",\"doi\":\"10.6859/aja.202112_59(4).0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preemptive analgesia is important for reducing postoperative analgesia requirement. Therefore, this study compared the efficacy of intravenous (IV) ketamine alone with the efficacy of a combination of low-dose IV ketamine and IV parecoxib as part of a multimodal preemptive analgesia regimen in patients undergoing elective laparotomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective study, 48 patients scheduled for elective laparotomy were randomized to two groups of preemptive analgesia, namely, group K-P, in which anestheologists administered a combination of 0.3 mg/kg IV ketamine and 40.0 mg IV parecoxib, or group K, in which ones gave 0.3 mg/kg IV ketamine alone. Patients from both groups underwent surgery under general anesthesia, and total intraoperative opioid requirement was recorded. After surgery, morphine administered by automated patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) infusion device was initiated in all patients. Pain score was assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS), and postoperative opioid requirement was recorded at 1 and 4 hours, and subsequently from 4-hour intervals up to 24 hours after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to group K, group K-P required significantly lower rescue IV fentanyl in the recovery bay (0.10 ± 0.28 vs. 0.35 ± 0.46 μg/kg; P = 0.031), showing prolonged time-to-first analgesic request recorded by PCA device (70.8 ± 40.0 vs. 22.2 ± 15.8 mins; P < 0.001), lower total morphine requirement delivered by PCA device (8.0 ± 4.6 vs. 16.8 ± 6.5 mg; P < 0.001), and lower VAS values measured at all time points. There was no significant difference in intraoperative total opioid requirement between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among laparotomy patients, multimodal preemptive analgesia by the use of a combination of low-dose IV ketamine and IV parecoxib was more effective than IV ketamine alone in reducing pain scores and postoperative analgesia requirement (e.g., PCA-administered morphine).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian journal of anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"59 4\",\"pages\":\"161-168\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian journal of anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6859/aja.202112_59(4).0004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6859/aja.202112_59(4).0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:先发制人镇痛对减少术后镇痛需求具有重要意义。因此,本研究比较了单独静脉注射氯胺酮与低剂量静脉注射氯胺酮和静脉注射帕瑞昔布作为选择性剖腹手术患者多模式先发制人镇痛方案的一部分的疗效。方法:在本前瞻性研究中,48例择期剖腹手术患者随机分为两组:K- p组,麻醉医师给予0.3 mg/kg静脉氯胺酮和40.0 mg静脉帕瑞昔布;K组,麻醉医师单独给予0.3 mg/kg静脉氯胺酮。两组患者均在全身麻醉下进行手术,并记录术中阿片类药物的总需求量。手术后,所有患者开始使用自动患者自控镇痛(PCA)输注器给药吗啡。使用视觉模拟评分(VAS)评估疼痛评分,并在术后1小时和4小时以及术后4小时至24小时间隔记录阿片类药物需求。结果:与K组相比,K- p组恢复区抢救IV芬太尼需求量显著降低(0.10±0.28∶0.35±0.46 μg/kg);P = 0.031),显示PCA设备记录的首次镇痛请求时间延长(70.8±40.0∶22.2±15.8 min;P < 0.001), PCA装置总吗啡需取量较低(8.0±4.6 vs. 16.8±6.5 mg;P < 0.001),所有时间点的VAS值均较低。两组术中总阿片类药物需要量无显著差异。结论:在剖腹手术患者中,低剂量静脉氯胺酮和静脉帕雷昔布联合使用多模式先发制人镇痛在降低疼痛评分和术后镇痛需求(如pca给药吗啡)方面比单独静脉氯胺酮更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Combination Between Ketamine and Parecoxib as Multimodal Preemptive Analgesia With Ketamine Alone for Elective Laparotomy.

Background: Preemptive analgesia is important for reducing postoperative analgesia requirement. Therefore, this study compared the efficacy of intravenous (IV) ketamine alone with the efficacy of a combination of low-dose IV ketamine and IV parecoxib as part of a multimodal preemptive analgesia regimen in patients undergoing elective laparotomy.

Methods: In this prospective study, 48 patients scheduled for elective laparotomy were randomized to two groups of preemptive analgesia, namely, group K-P, in which anestheologists administered a combination of 0.3 mg/kg IV ketamine and 40.0 mg IV parecoxib, or group K, in which ones gave 0.3 mg/kg IV ketamine alone. Patients from both groups underwent surgery under general anesthesia, and total intraoperative opioid requirement was recorded. After surgery, morphine administered by automated patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) infusion device was initiated in all patients. Pain score was assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS), and postoperative opioid requirement was recorded at 1 and 4 hours, and subsequently from 4-hour intervals up to 24 hours after surgery.

Results: Compared to group K, group K-P required significantly lower rescue IV fentanyl in the recovery bay (0.10 ± 0.28 vs. 0.35 ± 0.46 μg/kg; P = 0.031), showing prolonged time-to-first analgesic request recorded by PCA device (70.8 ± 40.0 vs. 22.2 ± 15.8 mins; P < 0.001), lower total morphine requirement delivered by PCA device (8.0 ± 4.6 vs. 16.8 ± 6.5 mg; P < 0.001), and lower VAS values measured at all time points. There was no significant difference in intraoperative total opioid requirement between the groups.

Conclusions: Among laparotomy patients, multimodal preemptive analgesia by the use of a combination of low-dose IV ketamine and IV parecoxib was more effective than IV ketamine alone in reducing pain scores and postoperative analgesia requirement (e.g., PCA-administered morphine).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asian journal of anesthesiology
Asian journal of anesthesiology Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Asian Journal of Anesthesiology (AJA), launched in 1962, is the official and peer-reviewed publication of the Taiwan Society of Anaesthesiologists. It is published quarterly (March/June/September/December) by Airiti and indexed in EMBASE, Medline, Scopus, ScienceDirect, SIIC Data Bases. AJA accepts submissions from around the world. AJA is the premier open access journal in the field of anaesthesia and its related disciplines of critical care and pain in Asia. The number of Chinese anaesthesiologists has reached more than 60,000 and is still growing. The journal aims to disseminate anaesthesiology research and services for the Chinese community and is now the main anaesthesiology journal for Chinese societies located in Taiwan, Mainland China, Hong Kong and Singapore. AJAcaters to clinicians of all relevant specialties and biomedical scientists working in the areas of anesthesia, critical care medicine and pain management, as well as other related fields (pharmacology, pathology molecular biology, etc). AJA''s editorial team is composed of local and regional experts in the field as well as many leading international experts. Article types accepted include review articles, research papers, short communication, correspondence and images.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信