眼眶细胞上皮样血管瘤。

IF 0.9 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Ocular Oncology and Pathology Pub Date : 2021-12-01 Epub Date: 2021-07-26 DOI:10.1159/000518614
Hillary C Stiefel, John D Ng, David J Wilson, Daniel M Albert
{"title":"眼眶细胞上皮样血管瘤。","authors":"Hillary C Stiefel, John D Ng, David J Wilson, Daniel M Albert","doi":"10.1159/000518614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dear Editor, This letter is a follow-up to an article published in the Journal of Ocular Oncology and Pathology in 2019 entitled “Orbital Cellular Epithelioid Hemangioma” [1]. The publication detailed a case of a vascular orbital lesion in a 58-year-old woman in whom the distinction between a benign cellular epithelioid hemangioma (EH) and a malignant epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) was difficult to make on histologic features alone. The case was reviewed by Christopher Fletcher, MD, at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, who utilized FOSB and CAMTA1 immunostains to detect cytogenetic rearrangements that supplemented the histopathologic examination in diagnosis. The consensus diagnosis of the lesion was benign cellular EH based on the presence of multifocal nuclear positivity for FOSB and negativity for CAMTA1 as both of these findings have been considered reassuring features that support a diagnosis of benign cellular EH and argue against a diagnosis of malignant EHE [2]. A recent re-evaluation of this case by Dr. Fletcher included an immunostain for TFE3 which showed weak positivity, followed by FISH that revealed a TFE3 gene rearrangement. As such, this lesion is better interpreted as an example of the rare subset of EHE characterized by YAP1-TFE3 gene fusion [3]. Since the time the original articles demonstrating FOSC gene rearrangements in EHs with associated overexpression of FOSB protein by IHC were published, it has been shown that FOSB and FOS may be expressed in a variety of other vascular lesions in the absence of gene rearrangement. Therefore, the positive IHC result in this case was false positive. The treating clinician and patient have been informed of the reclassification of this tumor as a malignant EHE, rather than a benign orbital cellular EH. These lesions are thought to account for approximately 5% of all EHE, and it is now recognized that they fortunately have a much better prognosis than conventional EHE [4]. The patient in this case is alive, with no known recurrence or metastasis.","PeriodicalId":19434,"journal":{"name":"Ocular Oncology and Pathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8740085/pdf/oop-0007-0447.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Orbital Cellular Epithelioid Hemangioma.\",\"authors\":\"Hillary C Stiefel, John D Ng, David J Wilson, Daniel M Albert\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000518614\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Dear Editor, This letter is a follow-up to an article published in the Journal of Ocular Oncology and Pathology in 2019 entitled “Orbital Cellular Epithelioid Hemangioma” [1]. The publication detailed a case of a vascular orbital lesion in a 58-year-old woman in whom the distinction between a benign cellular epithelioid hemangioma (EH) and a malignant epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) was difficult to make on histologic features alone. The case was reviewed by Christopher Fletcher, MD, at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, who utilized FOSB and CAMTA1 immunostains to detect cytogenetic rearrangements that supplemented the histopathologic examination in diagnosis. The consensus diagnosis of the lesion was benign cellular EH based on the presence of multifocal nuclear positivity for FOSB and negativity for CAMTA1 as both of these findings have been considered reassuring features that support a diagnosis of benign cellular EH and argue against a diagnosis of malignant EHE [2]. A recent re-evaluation of this case by Dr. Fletcher included an immunostain for TFE3 which showed weak positivity, followed by FISH that revealed a TFE3 gene rearrangement. As such, this lesion is better interpreted as an example of the rare subset of EHE characterized by YAP1-TFE3 gene fusion [3]. Since the time the original articles demonstrating FOSC gene rearrangements in EHs with associated overexpression of FOSB protein by IHC were published, it has been shown that FOSB and FOS may be expressed in a variety of other vascular lesions in the absence of gene rearrangement. Therefore, the positive IHC result in this case was false positive. The treating clinician and patient have been informed of the reclassification of this tumor as a malignant EHE, rather than a benign orbital cellular EH. These lesions are thought to account for approximately 5% of all EHE, and it is now recognized that they fortunately have a much better prognosis than conventional EHE [4]. The patient in this case is alive, with no known recurrence or metastasis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ocular Oncology and Pathology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8740085/pdf/oop-0007-0447.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ocular Oncology and Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000518614\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/7/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocular Oncology and Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000518614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Orbital Cellular Epithelioid Hemangioma.
Dear Editor, This letter is a follow-up to an article published in the Journal of Ocular Oncology and Pathology in 2019 entitled “Orbital Cellular Epithelioid Hemangioma” [1]. The publication detailed a case of a vascular orbital lesion in a 58-year-old woman in whom the distinction between a benign cellular epithelioid hemangioma (EH) and a malignant epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) was difficult to make on histologic features alone. The case was reviewed by Christopher Fletcher, MD, at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, who utilized FOSB and CAMTA1 immunostains to detect cytogenetic rearrangements that supplemented the histopathologic examination in diagnosis. The consensus diagnosis of the lesion was benign cellular EH based on the presence of multifocal nuclear positivity for FOSB and negativity for CAMTA1 as both of these findings have been considered reassuring features that support a diagnosis of benign cellular EH and argue against a diagnosis of malignant EHE [2]. A recent re-evaluation of this case by Dr. Fletcher included an immunostain for TFE3 which showed weak positivity, followed by FISH that revealed a TFE3 gene rearrangement. As such, this lesion is better interpreted as an example of the rare subset of EHE characterized by YAP1-TFE3 gene fusion [3]. Since the time the original articles demonstrating FOSC gene rearrangements in EHs with associated overexpression of FOSB protein by IHC were published, it has been shown that FOSB and FOS may be expressed in a variety of other vascular lesions in the absence of gene rearrangement. Therefore, the positive IHC result in this case was false positive. The treating clinician and patient have been informed of the reclassification of this tumor as a malignant EHE, rather than a benign orbital cellular EH. These lesions are thought to account for approximately 5% of all EHE, and it is now recognized that they fortunately have a much better prognosis than conventional EHE [4]. The patient in this case is alive, with no known recurrence or metastasis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信