分数微针射频装置和分数掺铒玻璃1565纳米装置治疗人类面部光老化:一项前瞻性,裂面,随机临床试验。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy Pub Date : 2021-08-01 Epub Date: 2022-01-27 DOI:10.1080/14764172.2022.2033783
Wenjie Dou, Qing Yang, Yue Yin, Xing Fan, Zhe Yang, Zhe Jian, Yanni Zhu, Jingyi Wei, Huan Jing, Xianjie Ma
{"title":"分数微针射频装置和分数掺铒玻璃1565纳米装置治疗人类面部光老化:一项前瞻性,裂面,随机临床试验。","authors":"Wenjie Dou,&nbsp;Qing Yang,&nbsp;Yue Yin,&nbsp;Xing Fan,&nbsp;Zhe Yang,&nbsp;Zhe Jian,&nbsp;Yanni Zhu,&nbsp;Jingyi Wei,&nbsp;Huan Jing,&nbsp;Xianjie Ma","doi":"10.1080/14764172.2022.2033783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Microneedle fractional radiofrequency (MFR) and non-ablative 1565 nm fractional laser (NAFL) have recently been introduced as new techniques to address the growing concern of facial photoaging. In this prospective randomized split-face study, we wanted to compare the safety and efficacy of MFR with that of NAFL for the treatment of facial photoaging in Asian patients. Fifteen healthy Chinese patients were enrolled for this randomized split-face study. Each patient underwent three sessions of treatment with MFR and NAFL on opposite sides of their face, one month apart. A blinded outcome assessment of the photoaging severity was performed by two independent plastic surgeons on a 5-point visual analogue scale (VAS, 0-4). Patient satisfaction was also scored based on a 5-point VAS (0 = dissatisfaction, 4 = extremely satisfied). Sagging of the nasolabial groove was evaluated using the Antera 3D camera, facial wrinkles and pores using the VISIA skin analysis system. Any adverse events that occurred during the study were also evaluated. Based on the VAS scores and results from the Antera 3D and VISIA, it was noted that there was a significant improvement in facial skin laxity, wrinkles, and pores, and lesser sagging of the nasolabial groove on both the MFR and NAFL sides of the face, compared with that of the baseline. Most patients were satisfied with the treatment and reported tolerable pain and crusting. Although no significant differences were observed between the MFR and NAFL treatments, the NAFL treatment resulted in a shorter downtime(4.56 ± 2.72d) than the MFR treatment(6.96 ± 3.27d). This study confirms the efficacy of MFR and NAFL treatments for facial skin rejuvenation in Asian patients. Furthermore, the therapies were found to be safe and well-tolerated. Our findings suggest that NAFL may be a more convenient treatment modality for facial photoaging because of its shorter downtime. However, sagging of the nasolabial groove was more improved by the MFR treatment than by the NAFL treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":54852,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fractional microneedle radiofrequency device and fractional erbium-doped glass 1,565-nm device treatment of human facial photoaging: a prospective, split-face, random clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Wenjie Dou,&nbsp;Qing Yang,&nbsp;Yue Yin,&nbsp;Xing Fan,&nbsp;Zhe Yang,&nbsp;Zhe Jian,&nbsp;Yanni Zhu,&nbsp;Jingyi Wei,&nbsp;Huan Jing,&nbsp;Xianjie Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14764172.2022.2033783\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Microneedle fractional radiofrequency (MFR) and non-ablative 1565 nm fractional laser (NAFL) have recently been introduced as new techniques to address the growing concern of facial photoaging. In this prospective randomized split-face study, we wanted to compare the safety and efficacy of MFR with that of NAFL for the treatment of facial photoaging in Asian patients. Fifteen healthy Chinese patients were enrolled for this randomized split-face study. Each patient underwent three sessions of treatment with MFR and NAFL on opposite sides of their face, one month apart. A blinded outcome assessment of the photoaging severity was performed by two independent plastic surgeons on a 5-point visual analogue scale (VAS, 0-4). Patient satisfaction was also scored based on a 5-point VAS (0 = dissatisfaction, 4 = extremely satisfied). Sagging of the nasolabial groove was evaluated using the Antera 3D camera, facial wrinkles and pores using the VISIA skin analysis system. Any adverse events that occurred during the study were also evaluated. Based on the VAS scores and results from the Antera 3D and VISIA, it was noted that there was a significant improvement in facial skin laxity, wrinkles, and pores, and lesser sagging of the nasolabial groove on both the MFR and NAFL sides of the face, compared with that of the baseline. Most patients were satisfied with the treatment and reported tolerable pain and crusting. Although no significant differences were observed between the MFR and NAFL treatments, the NAFL treatment resulted in a shorter downtime(4.56 ± 2.72d) than the MFR treatment(6.96 ± 3.27d). This study confirms the efficacy of MFR and NAFL treatments for facial skin rejuvenation in Asian patients. Furthermore, the therapies were found to be safe and well-tolerated. Our findings suggest that NAFL may be a more convenient treatment modality for facial photoaging because of its shorter downtime. However, sagging of the nasolabial groove was more improved by the MFR treatment than by the NAFL treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14764172.2022.2033783\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14764172.2022.2033783","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

微针分数射频(MFR)和非烧蚀1565nm分数激光(NAFL)是近年来被引入的新技术,以解决日益关注的面部光老化问题。在这项前瞻性随机裂脸研究中,我们希望比较MFR与NAFL治疗亚洲患者面部光老化的安全性和有效性。15名健康的中国患者参加了这项随机裂脸研究。每位患者分别在面部两侧进行MFR和NAFL治疗,间隔一个月。由两名独立整形外科医生以5分视觉模拟量表(VAS, 0-4)对光老化严重程度进行盲法结局评估。患者满意度也基于5点VAS评分(0 =不满意,4 =非常满意)。使用Antera 3D相机评估鼻唇沟下垂,使用VISIA皮肤分析系统评估面部皱纹和毛孔。研究期间发生的任何不良事件也被评估。根据VAS评分和Antera 3D和VISIA的结果,我们注意到与基线相比,面部皮肤松弛、皱纹和毛孔都有显著改善,面部MFR和NAFL两侧的鼻唇沟下垂较少。大多数患者对治疗满意,疼痛和结痂可耐受。虽然MFR和NAFL治疗之间没有显著差异,但NAFL治疗的停机时间(4.56±2.72d)比MFR治疗(6.96±3.27d)短。本研究证实了MFR和NAFL治疗亚洲患者面部皮肤年轻化的疗效。此外,这些疗法被发现是安全且耐受性良好的。我们的研究结果表明,NAFL可能是一种更方便的治疗面部光老化的方式,因为它的停机时间更短。然而,MFR治疗比NAFL治疗更能改善鼻唇沟下垂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fractional microneedle radiofrequency device and fractional erbium-doped glass 1,565-nm device treatment of human facial photoaging: a prospective, split-face, random clinical trial.

Microneedle fractional radiofrequency (MFR) and non-ablative 1565 nm fractional laser (NAFL) have recently been introduced as new techniques to address the growing concern of facial photoaging. In this prospective randomized split-face study, we wanted to compare the safety and efficacy of MFR with that of NAFL for the treatment of facial photoaging in Asian patients. Fifteen healthy Chinese patients were enrolled for this randomized split-face study. Each patient underwent three sessions of treatment with MFR and NAFL on opposite sides of their face, one month apart. A blinded outcome assessment of the photoaging severity was performed by two independent plastic surgeons on a 5-point visual analogue scale (VAS, 0-4). Patient satisfaction was also scored based on a 5-point VAS (0 = dissatisfaction, 4 = extremely satisfied). Sagging of the nasolabial groove was evaluated using the Antera 3D camera, facial wrinkles and pores using the VISIA skin analysis system. Any adverse events that occurred during the study were also evaluated. Based on the VAS scores and results from the Antera 3D and VISIA, it was noted that there was a significant improvement in facial skin laxity, wrinkles, and pores, and lesser sagging of the nasolabial groove on both the MFR and NAFL sides of the face, compared with that of the baseline. Most patients were satisfied with the treatment and reported tolerable pain and crusting. Although no significant differences were observed between the MFR and NAFL treatments, the NAFL treatment resulted in a shorter downtime(4.56 ± 2.72d) than the MFR treatment(6.96 ± 3.27d). This study confirms the efficacy of MFR and NAFL treatments for facial skin rejuvenation in Asian patients. Furthermore, the therapies were found to be safe and well-tolerated. Our findings suggest that NAFL may be a more convenient treatment modality for facial photoaging because of its shorter downtime. However, sagging of the nasolabial groove was more improved by the MFR treatment than by the NAFL treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A unique journal that focuses on the application of cosmetic laser and light therapies on the skin. The Journal of Cosmetic & Laser Therapy provides a forum for stimulating and up-to-date studies demonstrating the wide range of therapeutic options for clinicians and surgeons involved in cosmetic and dermatological treatment. The journal is aimed at dermatologists, cosmetic surgeons, plastic and facial plastic surgeons, oculoplastic surgeons and all those interested in the rapidly expanding field of cosmetic and laser therapy. Features include: -Cosmetic surgery, including facial rejuvenation, hair removal and skin resurfacing -Use of lasers and other light sources for cosmetic and dermatological treatment -Applications of peeling agents, fillers, injectables, implants and other cosmetic modalities -Topical treatments -Practical tips and safety issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信