住院医师面谈的影响:一项前瞻性研究。

Sarah L Nizamuddin, Junaid Nizamuddin, Usman Latif, Sang Mee Lee, Avery Tung, Allison Dalton, Jerome M Klafta, Michael O'Connor, Sajid S Shahul
{"title":"住院医师面谈的影响:一项前瞻性研究。","authors":"Sarah L Nizamuddin,&nbsp;Junaid Nizamuddin,&nbsp;Usman Latif,&nbsp;Sang Mee Lee,&nbsp;Avery Tung,&nbsp;Allison Dalton,&nbsp;Jerome M Klafta,&nbsp;Michael O'Connor,&nbsp;Sajid S Shahul","doi":"10.46374/volxxiii_issue4_nizamuddin","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This prospective study investigated whether in-person interviews affected interviewer assessments of anesthesiology residency applicants at an academic medical center, and which applicant characteristics influenced interview performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighteen faculty members involved in residency recruitment between November 2019 and January 2020 documented preinterview (after full application review) and postinterview scores of the applicants on a scale of 1 to 5. Faculty also reported the relative contributions of specific interview characteristics (personality, physical appearance, professional demeanor, discussion regarding academic/scholarly activity, and level of interest in the specialty) to their postinterview assessments. Mixed-effects models were used to assess whether interviews changed faculty assessment of applicants, and what the relative contributions of applicant characteristics were to faculty assessments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 696 interviews were conducted with 232 applicants. The postinterview scores differed significantly from the preinterview scores (estimated mean difference, 0.09 ± 0.02; <i>P</i> < 0.0001). The characteristics most affecting postinterview scores were positive impressions of applicants' personalities (marginal mean change in postinterview score, 0.259; 95% confidence interval, 0.221-0.297) and negative impressions of applicants' professional demeanor (marginal mean change, -0.257; 95% confidence interval, -0.350 to -0.164).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In-person interviews significantly affected residency applicants' scores. Personality and professional demeanor influenced scores more than did other characteristics examined. Further studies are needed to clarify the relevance of in-person interviews to the assessment of residency applicants.</p>","PeriodicalId":75067,"journal":{"name":"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM","volume":"23 4","pages":"E676"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8691172/pdf/i2333-0406-23-4-Nizamuddin.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Influence of the In-person Residency Interview: A Prospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah L Nizamuddin,&nbsp;Junaid Nizamuddin,&nbsp;Usman Latif,&nbsp;Sang Mee Lee,&nbsp;Avery Tung,&nbsp;Allison Dalton,&nbsp;Jerome M Klafta,&nbsp;Michael O'Connor,&nbsp;Sajid S Shahul\",\"doi\":\"10.46374/volxxiii_issue4_nizamuddin\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This prospective study investigated whether in-person interviews affected interviewer assessments of anesthesiology residency applicants at an academic medical center, and which applicant characteristics influenced interview performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighteen faculty members involved in residency recruitment between November 2019 and January 2020 documented preinterview (after full application review) and postinterview scores of the applicants on a scale of 1 to 5. Faculty also reported the relative contributions of specific interview characteristics (personality, physical appearance, professional demeanor, discussion regarding academic/scholarly activity, and level of interest in the specialty) to their postinterview assessments. Mixed-effects models were used to assess whether interviews changed faculty assessment of applicants, and what the relative contributions of applicant characteristics were to faculty assessments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 696 interviews were conducted with 232 applicants. The postinterview scores differed significantly from the preinterview scores (estimated mean difference, 0.09 ± 0.02; <i>P</i> < 0.0001). The characteristics most affecting postinterview scores were positive impressions of applicants' personalities (marginal mean change in postinterview score, 0.259; 95% confidence interval, 0.221-0.297) and negative impressions of applicants' professional demeanor (marginal mean change, -0.257; 95% confidence interval, -0.350 to -0.164).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In-person interviews significantly affected residency applicants' scores. Personality and professional demeanor influenced scores more than did other characteristics examined. Further studies are needed to clarify the relevance of in-person interviews to the assessment of residency applicants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM\",\"volume\":\"23 4\",\"pages\":\"E676\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8691172/pdf/i2333-0406-23-4-Nizamuddin.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46374/volxxiii_issue4_nizamuddin\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46374/volxxiii_issue4_nizamuddin","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本前瞻性研究调查了面对面访谈是否影响面试官对学术医疗中心麻醉学住院医师申请人的评估,以及申请人的哪些特征影响面试表现。方法:在2019年11月至2020年1月期间,参与住院医师招聘的18名教师记录了申请人的面试前(经过全面的申请审查)和面试后的分数,分数为1到5分。教师还报告了具体面试特征(性格、外貌、职业举止、关于学术/学术活动的讨论以及对专业的兴趣程度)对面试后评估的相对贡献。使用混合效应模型来评估面试是否改变了教师对申请人的评估,以及申请人特征对教师评估的相对贡献。结果:共进行了696次面试,应聘者232人。访谈后得分与访谈前得分差异显著(估计平均差异为0.09±0.02;P < 0.0001)。对面试后得分影响最大的特征是对应聘者性格的积极印象(面试后得分的边际平均变化为0.259;95%置信区间,0.221-0.297)和对应聘者职业举止的负面印象(边际平均变化,-0.257;95%置信区间为-0.350 ~ -0.164)。结论:面谈对住院医师申请人的得分有显著影响。性格和职业举止对得分的影响比其他特征更大。需要进一步的研究来阐明面对面面试对住院医师申请人评估的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Influence of the In-person Residency Interview: A Prospective Study.

The Influence of the In-person Residency Interview: A Prospective Study.

Background: This prospective study investigated whether in-person interviews affected interviewer assessments of anesthesiology residency applicants at an academic medical center, and which applicant characteristics influenced interview performance.

Methods: Eighteen faculty members involved in residency recruitment between November 2019 and January 2020 documented preinterview (after full application review) and postinterview scores of the applicants on a scale of 1 to 5. Faculty also reported the relative contributions of specific interview characteristics (personality, physical appearance, professional demeanor, discussion regarding academic/scholarly activity, and level of interest in the specialty) to their postinterview assessments. Mixed-effects models were used to assess whether interviews changed faculty assessment of applicants, and what the relative contributions of applicant characteristics were to faculty assessments.

Results: A total of 696 interviews were conducted with 232 applicants. The postinterview scores differed significantly from the preinterview scores (estimated mean difference, 0.09 ± 0.02; P < 0.0001). The characteristics most affecting postinterview scores were positive impressions of applicants' personalities (marginal mean change in postinterview score, 0.259; 95% confidence interval, 0.221-0.297) and negative impressions of applicants' professional demeanor (marginal mean change, -0.257; 95% confidence interval, -0.350 to -0.164).

Conclusions: In-person interviews significantly affected residency applicants' scores. Personality and professional demeanor influenced scores more than did other characteristics examined. Further studies are needed to clarify the relevance of in-person interviews to the assessment of residency applicants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信