接受外周体外膜氧合(ECMO)的成人大出血:预后和预测因素。

IF 1.8 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Critical Care Research and Practice Pub Date : 2022-01-15 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2022/5348835
Tung Phi Nguyen, Xuan Thi Phan, Tuan Huu Nguyen, Dai Quang Huynh, Linh Thanh Tran, Huy Minh Pham, Tu Ngoc Nguyen, Hieu Trung Kieu, Thao Thi Ngoc Pham
{"title":"接受外周体外膜氧合(ECMO)的成人大出血:预后和预测因素。","authors":"Tung Phi Nguyen,&nbsp;Xuan Thi Phan,&nbsp;Tuan Huu Nguyen,&nbsp;Dai Quang Huynh,&nbsp;Linh Thanh Tran,&nbsp;Huy Minh Pham,&nbsp;Tu Ngoc Nguyen,&nbsp;Hieu Trung Kieu,&nbsp;Thao Thi Ngoc Pham","doi":"10.1155/2022/5348835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Major bleeding has been a common and serious complication with poor outcomes in ECMO patients. With a novel, less-invasive cannulation approach and closer coagulation monitoring regime, the incidence of major bleeding is currently not determined yet. Our study aims to examine the incidence of major bleeding, its determinants, and association with mortality in peripheral-ECMO patients.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a single-center retrospective study on adult patients undergoing peripheral-ECMO between January 2019 and January 2020 at a tertiary referral hospital. Determinants of major bleeding were defined by logistic regression analysis. Risk factors of in-hospital mortality were determined by Cox proportional hazard regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Major bleeding was reported in 33/105 patients (31.4%) and was associated with higher in-hospital mortality [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 3.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.63-7.80, <i>p</i> < 0.001). There were no significant difference in age, sex, ECMO indications, ECMO modality, pre-ECMO APACHE-II and SOFA scores between two groups with and without major bleeding. Only APTT >72 seconds [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 7.10, 95% CI 2.60-19.50, <i>p</i> < 0.001], fibrinogen <2 g/L [aOR = 7.10, 95% CI 2.60-19.50, <i>p</i> < 0.001], and ACT >220 seconds [aOR = 3.9, 95% CI 1.20-11.80, <i>p</i>=0.017] on days with major bleeding were independent predictors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In summary, major bleeding still had a fairly high incidence and poor outcome in peripheral-ECMO patients. APTT > 72 seconds, fibrinogen < 2 g/L were the strongest predicting factors for major bleeding events.</p>","PeriodicalId":46583,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Research and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8783736/pdf/","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Major Bleeding in Adults Undergoing Peripheral Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO): Prognosis and Predictors.\",\"authors\":\"Tung Phi Nguyen,&nbsp;Xuan Thi Phan,&nbsp;Tuan Huu Nguyen,&nbsp;Dai Quang Huynh,&nbsp;Linh Thanh Tran,&nbsp;Huy Minh Pham,&nbsp;Tu Ngoc Nguyen,&nbsp;Hieu Trung Kieu,&nbsp;Thao Thi Ngoc Pham\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2022/5348835\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Major bleeding has been a common and serious complication with poor outcomes in ECMO patients. With a novel, less-invasive cannulation approach and closer coagulation monitoring regime, the incidence of major bleeding is currently not determined yet. Our study aims to examine the incidence of major bleeding, its determinants, and association with mortality in peripheral-ECMO patients.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a single-center retrospective study on adult patients undergoing peripheral-ECMO between January 2019 and January 2020 at a tertiary referral hospital. Determinants of major bleeding were defined by logistic regression analysis. Risk factors of in-hospital mortality were determined by Cox proportional hazard regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Major bleeding was reported in 33/105 patients (31.4%) and was associated with higher in-hospital mortality [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 3.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.63-7.80, <i>p</i> < 0.001). There were no significant difference in age, sex, ECMO indications, ECMO modality, pre-ECMO APACHE-II and SOFA scores between two groups with and without major bleeding. Only APTT >72 seconds [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 7.10, 95% CI 2.60-19.50, <i>p</i> < 0.001], fibrinogen <2 g/L [aOR = 7.10, 95% CI 2.60-19.50, <i>p</i> < 0.001], and ACT >220 seconds [aOR = 3.9, 95% CI 1.20-11.80, <i>p</i>=0.017] on days with major bleeding were independent predictors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In summary, major bleeding still had a fairly high incidence and poor outcome in peripheral-ECMO patients. APTT > 72 seconds, fibrinogen < 2 g/L were the strongest predicting factors for major bleeding events.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46583,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care Research and Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8783736/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5348835\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5348835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

背景:大出血是ECMO患者常见且严重的并发症,预后较差。随着一种新颖的、侵入性更小的插管方法和更紧密的凝血监测制度,大出血的发生率目前尚未确定。本研究旨在探讨外周ecmo患者大出血的发生率、决定因素及其与死亡率的关系。方法:对2019年1月至2020年1月在某三级转诊医院接受外周ecmo的成年患者进行单中心回顾性研究。通过logistic回归分析确定大出血的决定因素。采用Cox比例风险回归分析确定住院死亡率的危险因素。结果:105例患者中有33例(31.4%)出现大出血,并伴有较高的住院死亡率[校正风险比(aHR) 3.56, 95%可信区间(CI) 1.63 ~ 7.80, p < 0.001]。有无大出血的两组患者在年龄、性别、ECMO适应证、ECMO方式、ECMO前APACHE-II和SOFA评分方面无显著差异。只有APTT >72秒[调整优势比(aOR) 7.10, 95% CI 2.60-19.50, p < 0.001]、纤维蛋白原p < 0.001]和ACT >220秒[aOR = 3.9, 95% CI 1.20-11.80, p=0.017]是大出血天数的独立预测因子。结论:综上所述,外周ecmo患者大出血发生率仍然较高,预后较差。APTT > 72秒,纤维蛋白原
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Major Bleeding in Adults Undergoing Peripheral Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO): Prognosis and Predictors.

Major Bleeding in Adults Undergoing Peripheral Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO): Prognosis and Predictors.

Major Bleeding in Adults Undergoing Peripheral Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO): Prognosis and Predictors.

Major Bleeding in Adults Undergoing Peripheral Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO): Prognosis and Predictors.

Background: Major bleeding has been a common and serious complication with poor outcomes in ECMO patients. With a novel, less-invasive cannulation approach and closer coagulation monitoring regime, the incidence of major bleeding is currently not determined yet. Our study aims to examine the incidence of major bleeding, its determinants, and association with mortality in peripheral-ECMO patients.

Method: We conducted a single-center retrospective study on adult patients undergoing peripheral-ECMO between January 2019 and January 2020 at a tertiary referral hospital. Determinants of major bleeding were defined by logistic regression analysis. Risk factors of in-hospital mortality were determined by Cox proportional hazard regression analysis.

Results: Major bleeding was reported in 33/105 patients (31.4%) and was associated with higher in-hospital mortality [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 3.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.63-7.80, p < 0.001). There were no significant difference in age, sex, ECMO indications, ECMO modality, pre-ECMO APACHE-II and SOFA scores between two groups with and without major bleeding. Only APTT >72 seconds [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 7.10, 95% CI 2.60-19.50, p < 0.001], fibrinogen <2 g/L [aOR = 7.10, 95% CI 2.60-19.50, p < 0.001], and ACT >220 seconds [aOR = 3.9, 95% CI 1.20-11.80, p=0.017] on days with major bleeding were independent predictors.

Conclusions: In summary, major bleeding still had a fairly high incidence and poor outcome in peripheral-ECMO patients. APTT > 72 seconds, fibrinogen < 2 g/L were the strongest predicting factors for major bleeding events.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care Research and Practice
Critical Care Research and Practice CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信