癌胚抗原翻倍时间在局部复发直肠癌根治性切除后预后预测中的价值:一项回顾性研究。

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Digestive Surgery Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-11-08 DOI:10.1159/000520694
Junichi Sakamoto, Heita Ozawa, Hiroki Nakanishi, Shin Fujita
{"title":"癌胚抗原翻倍时间在局部复发直肠癌根治性切除后预后预测中的价值:一项回顾性研究。","authors":"Junichi Sakamoto,&nbsp;Heita Ozawa,&nbsp;Hiroki Nakanishi,&nbsp;Shin Fujita","doi":"10.1159/000520694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Given that doubling time is an indicator of tumor growth, we assessed the usefulness of carcinoembryonic antigen doubling time (CEA-DT) in prognosis prediction after curative resection for locally recurrent rectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>During January 1986-December 2016, 33 patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer who underwent curative resection at our hospital were retrospectively reviewed. The primary endpoint was the 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare RFS rates and evaluate univariate and multivariate analyses for factors associated with oncologic outcomes, including CEA-DT. CEA-DT was classified into 2 groups: the short and long CEA-DT groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 3-year overall survival and RFS rates were 62.6% and 42.4%, respectively. In multivariate analyses, CEA-DT was an independent risk factor for poor RFS. The 3-year RFS rate was significantly better in the long CEA-DT group than in the short CEA-DT group (58.8% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.0063).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CEA-DT is a useful prognostic factor that can be assessed before surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer. Long CEA-DT may indicate a favorable prognosis. Contrarily, short CEA-DT is associated with poor prognosis; therefore, further treatment intervention is necessary for patients with short CEA-DT.</p>","PeriodicalId":11241,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Usefulness of Carcinoembryonic Antigen Doubling Time in Prognosis Prediction after Curative Resection of Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer: A Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Junichi Sakamoto,&nbsp;Heita Ozawa,&nbsp;Hiroki Nakanishi,&nbsp;Shin Fujita\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000520694\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Given that doubling time is an indicator of tumor growth, we assessed the usefulness of carcinoembryonic antigen doubling time (CEA-DT) in prognosis prediction after curative resection for locally recurrent rectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>During January 1986-December 2016, 33 patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer who underwent curative resection at our hospital were retrospectively reviewed. The primary endpoint was the 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare RFS rates and evaluate univariate and multivariate analyses for factors associated with oncologic outcomes, including CEA-DT. CEA-DT was classified into 2 groups: the short and long CEA-DT groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 3-year overall survival and RFS rates were 62.6% and 42.4%, respectively. In multivariate analyses, CEA-DT was an independent risk factor for poor RFS. The 3-year RFS rate was significantly better in the long CEA-DT group than in the short CEA-DT group (58.8% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.0063).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CEA-DT is a useful prognostic factor that can be assessed before surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer. Long CEA-DT may indicate a favorable prognosis. Contrarily, short CEA-DT is associated with poor prognosis; therefore, further treatment intervention is necessary for patients with short CEA-DT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digestive Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digestive Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000520694\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/11/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000520694","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

鉴于倍增时间是肿瘤生长的一个指标,我们评估了癌胚抗原倍增时间(CEA-DT)在局部复发直肠癌根治性切除后预后预测中的作用。方法:对1986年1月~ 2016年12月在我院行根治性切除术的局部复发直肠癌患者33例进行回顾性分析。主要终点是3年无复发生存率(RFS)。Kaplan-Meier方法用于比较RFS率,并评估与肿瘤预后相关因素的单因素和多因素分析,包括CEA-DT。CEA-DT分为2组:短组和长组。结果:3年总生存率和RFS分别为62.6%和42.4%。在多变量分析中,CEA-DT是RFS差的独立危险因素。长CEA-DT组3年RFS率明显优于短CEA-DT组(58.8% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.0063)。结论:CEA-DT是局部复发直肠癌术前评估的有效预后因素。长CEA-DT可能预示预后良好。相反,CEA-DT短与预后差相关;因此,对于短CEA-DT患者,需要进一步的治疗干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Usefulness of Carcinoembryonic Antigen Doubling Time in Prognosis Prediction after Curative Resection of Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer: A Retrospective Study.

Introduction: Given that doubling time is an indicator of tumor growth, we assessed the usefulness of carcinoembryonic antigen doubling time (CEA-DT) in prognosis prediction after curative resection for locally recurrent rectal cancer.

Methods: During January 1986-December 2016, 33 patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer who underwent curative resection at our hospital were retrospectively reviewed. The primary endpoint was the 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare RFS rates and evaluate univariate and multivariate analyses for factors associated with oncologic outcomes, including CEA-DT. CEA-DT was classified into 2 groups: the short and long CEA-DT groups.

Results: The 3-year overall survival and RFS rates were 62.6% and 42.4%, respectively. In multivariate analyses, CEA-DT was an independent risk factor for poor RFS. The 3-year RFS rate was significantly better in the long CEA-DT group than in the short CEA-DT group (58.8% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.0063).

Conclusion: CEA-DT is a useful prognostic factor that can be assessed before surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer. Long CEA-DT may indicate a favorable prognosis. Contrarily, short CEA-DT is associated with poor prognosis; therefore, further treatment intervention is necessary for patients with short CEA-DT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Digestive Surgery
Digestive Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.70%
发文量
25
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: ''Digestive Surgery'' presents a comprehensive overview in the field of gastrointestinal surgery. Interdisciplinary in scope, the journal keeps the specialist aware of advances in all fields that contribute to improvements in the diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal disease. Particular emphasis is given to articles that evaluate not only recent clinical developments, especially clinical trials and technical innovations such as new endoscopic and laparoscopic procedures, but also relevant translational research. Each contribution is carefully aligned with the need of the digestive surgeon. Thus, the journal is an important component of the continuing medical education of surgeons who want their practice to benefit from a familiarity with new knowledge in all its dimensions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信