3d打印引导下下颌前骨无瓣微创手术的准确性评价。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Antônio Luís Neto Custódio, Bruno Ramos Chrcanovic, Andrew Cameron, Mahmoud Bakr, Peter Reher
{"title":"3d打印引导下下颌前骨无瓣微创手术的准确性评价。","authors":"Antônio Luís Neto Custódio,&nbsp;Bruno Ramos Chrcanovic,&nbsp;Andrew Cameron,&nbsp;Mahmoud Bakr,&nbsp;Peter Reher","doi":"10.3290/j.ijcd.b2599841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the accuracy of tridimensional (3D)-printed guide-assisted flapless cortical bone micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) in the anterior mandible on a cadaver model.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Five human cadaver heads with complete dentition in the anterior mandible were used in the present study. Preplanning CBCT and intraoral surface scans were obtained. After alignment, drilling sites in the interradicular areas were planned from canine to canine, and a surgical guide was printed. The drilling was performed and a postprocedure CBCT scan was obtained to assess the accuracy of the procedure in relation to the virtual planning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean ± standard deviation (SD) mesiodistal interradicular space was 2.67 ± 0.84 mm. The mean ± SD error of the actual drilled hole compared with the planned position of the mesial drill site was 0.66 ± 0.33 mm, and to the distal drill site it was 0.56 ± 0.33 mm. There was a statistically significant difference between the number of times the teeth were hit mesially (10 out of 64 holes) and distally (none).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed technique, limited to an ex vivo scenario, provides a valid and reliable method for mandibular MOPs using a 3D-generated surgical guide. However, the risk of damaging adjacent radicular surfaces, particularly in areas with limited mesiodistal interradicular bone, needs to be considered. Further studies should focus on using thinner drills and adding other methods to stabilize the guide. Additionally, by selecting individuals and perforation sites with more mesiodistal interradicular bone, less damage is likely. (Int J Comput Dent 2022;25(4):387-0; doi: 10.3290/j.ijcd.b2599841).</p>","PeriodicalId":48666,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Computerized Dentistry","volume":"25 4","pages":"387-396"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy evaluation of 3D-printed guide-assisted flapless micro-osteoperforations in the anterior mandible.\",\"authors\":\"Antônio Luís Neto Custódio,&nbsp;Bruno Ramos Chrcanovic,&nbsp;Andrew Cameron,&nbsp;Mahmoud Bakr,&nbsp;Peter Reher\",\"doi\":\"10.3290/j.ijcd.b2599841\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the accuracy of tridimensional (3D)-printed guide-assisted flapless cortical bone micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) in the anterior mandible on a cadaver model.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Five human cadaver heads with complete dentition in the anterior mandible were used in the present study. Preplanning CBCT and intraoral surface scans were obtained. After alignment, drilling sites in the interradicular areas were planned from canine to canine, and a surgical guide was printed. The drilling was performed and a postprocedure CBCT scan was obtained to assess the accuracy of the procedure in relation to the virtual planning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean ± standard deviation (SD) mesiodistal interradicular space was 2.67 ± 0.84 mm. The mean ± SD error of the actual drilled hole compared with the planned position of the mesial drill site was 0.66 ± 0.33 mm, and to the distal drill site it was 0.56 ± 0.33 mm. There was a statistically significant difference between the number of times the teeth were hit mesially (10 out of 64 holes) and distally (none).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed technique, limited to an ex vivo scenario, provides a valid and reliable method for mandibular MOPs using a 3D-generated surgical guide. However, the risk of damaging adjacent radicular surfaces, particularly in areas with limited mesiodistal interradicular bone, needs to be considered. Further studies should focus on using thinner drills and adding other methods to stabilize the guide. Additionally, by selecting individuals and perforation sites with more mesiodistal interradicular bone, less damage is likely. (Int J Comput Dent 2022;25(4):387-0; doi: 10.3290/j.ijcd.b2599841).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48666,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Computerized Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"25 4\",\"pages\":\"387-396\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Computerized Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.ijcd.b2599841\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Computerized Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.ijcd.b2599841","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价三维打印引导下无瓣皮质骨显微下颌骨手术在尸体模型上的准确性。材料与方法:采用5具前下颌牙列完整的尸体头颅进行研究。术前行CBCT和口内表面扫描。对准后,在根间区域从犬齿到犬齿规划钻孔位置,并打印手术指南。进行钻孔,并进行术后CBCT扫描,以评估与虚拟规划相关的手术准确性。结果:近远端根间间隙均值±标准差(SD)为2.67±0.84 mm。实际钻孔与计划近端钻孔位置的平均±SD误差为0.66±0.33 mm,与远端钻孔位置的平均±SD误差为0.56±0.33 mm。在近端(64个孔中有10个)和远端(没有)牙齿撞击次数之间有统计学上的显著差异。结论:所提出的技术仅限于离体情况,使用3d生成的手术指南为下颌MOPs提供了一种有效可靠的方法。然而,需要考虑损伤邻近神经根表面的风险,特别是在中远端神经根间骨有限的区域。进一步的研究应集中在使用更薄的钻头和增加其他方法来稳定导向。此外,通过选择具有更多中远端根间骨的个体和穿孔部位,可能会减少损伤。[J] .计算机学报;2009;25(4):387- 398;doi: 10.3290 / j.ijcd.b2599841)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accuracy evaluation of 3D-printed guide-assisted flapless micro-osteoperforations in the anterior mandible.

Aim: To evaluate the accuracy of tridimensional (3D)-printed guide-assisted flapless cortical bone micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) in the anterior mandible on a cadaver model.

Materials and methods: Five human cadaver heads with complete dentition in the anterior mandible were used in the present study. Preplanning CBCT and intraoral surface scans were obtained. After alignment, drilling sites in the interradicular areas were planned from canine to canine, and a surgical guide was printed. The drilling was performed and a postprocedure CBCT scan was obtained to assess the accuracy of the procedure in relation to the virtual planning.

Results: The mean ± standard deviation (SD) mesiodistal interradicular space was 2.67 ± 0.84 mm. The mean ± SD error of the actual drilled hole compared with the planned position of the mesial drill site was 0.66 ± 0.33 mm, and to the distal drill site it was 0.56 ± 0.33 mm. There was a statistically significant difference between the number of times the teeth were hit mesially (10 out of 64 holes) and distally (none).

Conclusions: The proposed technique, limited to an ex vivo scenario, provides a valid and reliable method for mandibular MOPs using a 3D-generated surgical guide. However, the risk of damaging adjacent radicular surfaces, particularly in areas with limited mesiodistal interradicular bone, needs to be considered. Further studies should focus on using thinner drills and adding other methods to stabilize the guide. Additionally, by selecting individuals and perforation sites with more mesiodistal interradicular bone, less damage is likely. (Int J Comput Dent 2022;25(4):387-0; doi: 10.3290/j.ijcd.b2599841).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Computerized Dentistry
International Journal of Computerized Dentistry Dentistry-Dentistry (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: This journal explores the myriad innovations in the emerging field of computerized dentistry and how to integrate them into clinical practice. The bulk of the journal is devoted to the science of computer-assisted dentistry, with research articles and clinical reports on all aspects of computer-based diagnostic and therapeutic applications, with special emphasis placed on CAD/CAM and image-processing systems. Articles also address the use of computer-based communication to support patient care, assess the quality of care, and enhance clinical decision making. The journal is presented in a bilingual format, with each issue offering three types of articles: science-based, application-based, and national society reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信