[在西班牙使用ataluren:行政上的不连贯和伦理影响]。

IF 0.3 Q4 ETHICS
Pilar Pacheco López, María Antonia Meroño Saura, Ana Aranda García
{"title":"[在西班牙使用ataluren:行政上的不连贯和伦理影响]。","authors":"Pilar Pacheco López,&nbsp;María Antonia Meroño Saura,&nbsp;Ana Aranda García","doi":"10.30444/CB.108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Duchenne muscular dystrophy is a rare genetic disease with only ataluren like pharmaceutical treatment available. This drug received a conditional authorization by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in 2014, meaning that it was commercially available while waiting for more solid results that demonstrate the efficacy and safety. Currently, the authorization still maintains the ″conditional″ modality, and the actual health benefits of the drug still remain unclear. In Spain, ataluren is not financed by the National Health System. The decision of non-financing has generated a heated debate, especially because in those patients who se treatment were started prior to the non-financing decision the drug has continued being funded. This controversial situation encompasses complex aspects of pharmaceutical and health management related to scientific evidence, the motivations of regulatory agencies and the pharmaceutical industry in the processes of drug investigation and authorization. Furthermore, as the center of the debate, some pillars of bioethics such as justice and equity, as well as certain legal principles, such as the protection of minors, are involved.</p>","PeriodicalId":42510,"journal":{"name":"Cuadernos de Bioetica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Use of ataluren in Spain: administrative incoherences and ethical implications].\",\"authors\":\"Pilar Pacheco López,&nbsp;María Antonia Meroño Saura,&nbsp;Ana Aranda García\",\"doi\":\"10.30444/CB.108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Duchenne muscular dystrophy is a rare genetic disease with only ataluren like pharmaceutical treatment available. This drug received a conditional authorization by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in 2014, meaning that it was commercially available while waiting for more solid results that demonstrate the efficacy and safety. Currently, the authorization still maintains the ″conditional″ modality, and the actual health benefits of the drug still remain unclear. In Spain, ataluren is not financed by the National Health System. The decision of non-financing has generated a heated debate, especially because in those patients who se treatment were started prior to the non-financing decision the drug has continued being funded. This controversial situation encompasses complex aspects of pharmaceutical and health management related to scientific evidence, the motivations of regulatory agencies and the pharmaceutical industry in the processes of drug investigation and authorization. Furthermore, as the center of the debate, some pillars of bioethics such as justice and equity, as well as certain legal principles, such as the protection of minors, are involved.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42510,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cuadernos de Bioetica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cuadernos de Bioetica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30444/CB.108\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuadernos de Bioetica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30444/CB.108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

杜氏肌营养不良症是一种罕见的遗传性疾病,只有非营养品类药物治疗可用。2014年,该药物获得了欧洲药品管理局(EMA)的有条件批准,这意味着它可以在等待更可靠的疗效和安全性结果的同时上市。目前,该授权仍保持″有条件″模式,药物的实际健康益处仍不清楚。在西班牙,ataluren不是由国家卫生系统资助的。不资助的决定引起了激烈的争论,特别是因为那些在不资助决定之前就开始治疗的患者,药物继续得到资助。这种有争议的情况包括与科学证据、监管机构和制药行业在药物调查和授权过程中的动机有关的制药和健康管理的复杂方面。此外,作为争论的中心,涉及到生命伦理学的一些支柱,如正义和公平,以及某些法律原则,如保护未成年人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Use of ataluren in Spain: administrative incoherences and ethical implications].

Duchenne muscular dystrophy is a rare genetic disease with only ataluren like pharmaceutical treatment available. This drug received a conditional authorization by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in 2014, meaning that it was commercially available while waiting for more solid results that demonstrate the efficacy and safety. Currently, the authorization still maintains the ″conditional″ modality, and the actual health benefits of the drug still remain unclear. In Spain, ataluren is not financed by the National Health System. The decision of non-financing has generated a heated debate, especially because in those patients who se treatment were started prior to the non-financing decision the drug has continued being funded. This controversial situation encompasses complex aspects of pharmaceutical and health management related to scientific evidence, the motivations of regulatory agencies and the pharmaceutical industry in the processes of drug investigation and authorization. Furthermore, as the center of the debate, some pillars of bioethics such as justice and equity, as well as certain legal principles, such as the protection of minors, are involved.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
5
期刊介绍: La revista Cuadernos de Bioética, órgano oficial de la Asociación Española de Bioética y Ética Médica, publica cuatrimestralmente artículos y recensiones bibliográficas sobre todas las áreas de la bioética: fundamentación, ética de la investigación, bioética clínica, biojurídica, etc. Estos proceden de los aceptados en la revisión tutelada por los editores de la revista como de otros que por encargo el comité editorial solicite a sus autores. La edicion de la revista se financia con las aportaciones de los socios de AEBI.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信