基于体外和计算机输入数据的下一代人体生理动力学(PBK)模型的预测性能

ALTEX Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-01-19 DOI:10.14573/altex.2108301
Ans Punt, Jochem Louisse, Karsten Beekmann, Nicole Pinckaers, Eric Fabian, Bennard Van Ravenzwaay, Paul L Carmichael, Ian Sorrell, Thomas E Moxon
{"title":"基于体外和计算机输入数据的下一代人体生理动力学(PBK)模型的预测性能","authors":"Ans Punt,&nbsp;Jochem Louisse,&nbsp;Karsten Beekmann,&nbsp;Nicole Pinckaers,&nbsp;Eric Fabian,&nbsp;Bennard Van Ravenzwaay,&nbsp;Paul L Carmichael,&nbsp;Ian Sorrell,&nbsp;Thomas E Moxon","doi":"10.14573/altex.2108301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The goal of the present study was to assess the predictive performance of a generic human physiologically based kinetic (PBK) model based on in vitro and in silico input data and the effect of using different input approaches for chemical parameterization on those predictions. For this purpose, a dataset was created of 38,772 Cmax predictions for 44 compounds by applying different combinations of in vitro and in silico approaches for chemical parameterization, and these predicted Cmax values were compared to reported in vivo data. Best results were achieved when the hepatic clearance was parameterized based on in vitro (i.e., hepatocytes or liver S9) measured intrinsic clearance values, the method of Rodgers and Rowland for calculating tissue:plasma partition coefficients, and the method of Lobell and Sivarajah for calculating the fraction unbound in plasma. With these parameters, the median Cmax values of 34 out of the 44 compounds were predicted within 5-fold of the observed Cmax, and the Cmax values of 19 compounds were predicted within 2-fold. The median Cmax values of 10 compounds were more than 5-fold overestimated. Underestimations (> 5-fold) did not occur. A comparison of the current generic PBK model structure with chemical-specific PBK models available in literature was made to identify possible kinetic processes not included in the generic PBK model that might explain the overestimations. Overall, the results provide crucial insights into the predictive performance of PBK models based on in vitro and in silico input and the influence of different input approaches on the model predictions.</p>","PeriodicalId":520550,"journal":{"name":"ALTEX","volume":" ","pages":"221–234"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive performance of next generation human physiologically based kinetic (PBK) models based on in vitro and in silico input data.\",\"authors\":\"Ans Punt,&nbsp;Jochem Louisse,&nbsp;Karsten Beekmann,&nbsp;Nicole Pinckaers,&nbsp;Eric Fabian,&nbsp;Bennard Van Ravenzwaay,&nbsp;Paul L Carmichael,&nbsp;Ian Sorrell,&nbsp;Thomas E Moxon\",\"doi\":\"10.14573/altex.2108301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The goal of the present study was to assess the predictive performance of a generic human physiologically based kinetic (PBK) model based on in vitro and in silico input data and the effect of using different input approaches for chemical parameterization on those predictions. For this purpose, a dataset was created of 38,772 Cmax predictions for 44 compounds by applying different combinations of in vitro and in silico approaches for chemical parameterization, and these predicted Cmax values were compared to reported in vivo data. Best results were achieved when the hepatic clearance was parameterized based on in vitro (i.e., hepatocytes or liver S9) measured intrinsic clearance values, the method of Rodgers and Rowland for calculating tissue:plasma partition coefficients, and the method of Lobell and Sivarajah for calculating the fraction unbound in plasma. With these parameters, the median Cmax values of 34 out of the 44 compounds were predicted within 5-fold of the observed Cmax, and the Cmax values of 19 compounds were predicted within 2-fold. The median Cmax values of 10 compounds were more than 5-fold overestimated. Underestimations (> 5-fold) did not occur. A comparison of the current generic PBK model structure with chemical-specific PBK models available in literature was made to identify possible kinetic processes not included in the generic PBK model that might explain the overestimations. Overall, the results provide crucial insights into the predictive performance of PBK models based on in vitro and in silico input and the influence of different input approaches on the model predictions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520550,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ALTEX\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"221–234\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ALTEX\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.2108301\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ALTEX","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.2108301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是评估基于体外和计算机输入数据的通用人类生理动力学(PBK)模型的预测性能,以及使用不同的化学参数化输入方法对这些预测的影响。为此,通过应用体外和计算机化学参数化方法的不同组合,建立了44种化合物的38,772个Cmax预测数据集,并将这些预测的Cmax值与报道的体内数据进行比较。当肝清除率以体外(即肝细胞或肝S9)测量的固有清除率值、Rodgers和Rowland计算组织:血浆分配系数的方法以及Lobell和Sivarajah计算血浆中未结合部分的方法为参数化时,可获得最佳结果。利用这些参数,44个化合物中有34个化合物的Cmax预测值中位数在观测值的5倍以内,19个化合物的Cmax预测值在2倍以内。10种化合物的中位Cmax值被高估了5倍以上。未发生低估(> 5倍)。将现有的通用PBK模型结构与文献中可用的化学特异性PBK模型进行比较,以确定通用PBK模型中未包含的可能解释高估的动力学过程。总的来说,这些结果为基于体外和计算机输入的PBK模型的预测性能以及不同输入方法对模型预测的影响提供了重要的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictive performance of next generation human physiologically based kinetic (PBK) models based on in vitro and in silico input data.

The goal of the present study was to assess the predictive performance of a generic human physiologically based kinetic (PBK) model based on in vitro and in silico input data and the effect of using different input approaches for chemical parameterization on those predictions. For this purpose, a dataset was created of 38,772 Cmax predictions for 44 compounds by applying different combinations of in vitro and in silico approaches for chemical parameterization, and these predicted Cmax values were compared to reported in vivo data. Best results were achieved when the hepatic clearance was parameterized based on in vitro (i.e., hepatocytes or liver S9) measured intrinsic clearance values, the method of Rodgers and Rowland for calculating tissue:plasma partition coefficients, and the method of Lobell and Sivarajah for calculating the fraction unbound in plasma. With these parameters, the median Cmax values of 34 out of the 44 compounds were predicted within 5-fold of the observed Cmax, and the Cmax values of 19 compounds were predicted within 2-fold. The median Cmax values of 10 compounds were more than 5-fold overestimated. Underestimations (> 5-fold) did not occur. A comparison of the current generic PBK model structure with chemical-specific PBK models available in literature was made to identify possible kinetic processes not included in the generic PBK model that might explain the overestimations. Overall, the results provide crucial insights into the predictive performance of PBK models based on in vitro and in silico input and the influence of different input approaches on the model predictions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信