Tegan Cruwys, Catherine Haslam, Joanne A Rathbone, Elyse Williams, S Alexander Haslam, Zoe C Walter
{"title":"健康与认知行为疗法治疗年轻人抑郁和孤独:随机3期非劣效性试验,随访12个月。","authors":"Tegan Cruwys, Catherine Haslam, Joanne A Rathbone, Elyse Williams, S Alexander Haslam, Zoe C Walter","doi":"10.1192/bjp.2021.128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Depression treatments are typically less effective for young people than for adults. However, treatments rarely target loneliness, which is a key risk factor in the onset, maintenance and development of depression.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study evaluated the efficacy of a novel loneliness intervention, Groups 4 Health (G4H), relative to the best-practice treatment of cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) in reducing loneliness and depression over a 12-month period (Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry: ACTRN12618000440224).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study was a phase 3 randomised non-inferiority trial comparing G4H with dose-controlled group CBT. Participants were 174 people aged 15-25 years experiencing loneliness and clinically significant symptoms of depression, who were not in receipt of adjunct treatment. Participants were recruited from mental health services in Southeast Queensland, Australia. Randomisation was conducted using computer software. Follow-up assessments and statistical analyses were masked to allocation. Both interventions consisted of five 75 min group-based psychotherapy sessions. The primary outcomes were depression and loneliness, with a non-inferiority margin of 2.20 for depression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The trial enrolled 174 participants between 24 April 2018 and 25 May 2019, with 84 in the G4H condition and 90 in the CBT condition. All randomised participants were included in the intention-to-treat analyses (n = 174). The pre-post effect sizes for depression were dG4H = -0.71 and dCBT = -0.91. For loneliness, they were dG4H = -1.07 and dCBT = -0.89. At 12-month follow-up, the absolute difference between groups on depression was 1.176 (95% CI -1.94 to 4.29) and on loneliness it was -0.679 (95% CI -1.43 to 0.07). No adverse effects were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>G4H was non-inferior to CBT for depression and showed a slight advantage over CBT for loneliness that emerged after treatment completion.</p>","PeriodicalId":520791,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science","volume":" ","pages":"140-147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Groups 4 Health versus cognitive-behavioural therapy for depression and loneliness in young people: randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial with 12-month follow-up.\",\"authors\":\"Tegan Cruwys, Catherine Haslam, Joanne A Rathbone, Elyse Williams, S Alexander Haslam, Zoe C Walter\",\"doi\":\"10.1192/bjp.2021.128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Depression treatments are typically less effective for young people than for adults. However, treatments rarely target loneliness, which is a key risk factor in the onset, maintenance and development of depression.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study evaluated the efficacy of a novel loneliness intervention, Groups 4 Health (G4H), relative to the best-practice treatment of cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) in reducing loneliness and depression over a 12-month period (Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry: ACTRN12618000440224).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study was a phase 3 randomised non-inferiority trial comparing G4H with dose-controlled group CBT. Participants were 174 people aged 15-25 years experiencing loneliness and clinically significant symptoms of depression, who were not in receipt of adjunct treatment. Participants were recruited from mental health services in Southeast Queensland, Australia. Randomisation was conducted using computer software. Follow-up assessments and statistical analyses were masked to allocation. Both interventions consisted of five 75 min group-based psychotherapy sessions. The primary outcomes were depression and loneliness, with a non-inferiority margin of 2.20 for depression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The trial enrolled 174 participants between 24 April 2018 and 25 May 2019, with 84 in the G4H condition and 90 in the CBT condition. All randomised participants were included in the intention-to-treat analyses (n = 174). The pre-post effect sizes for depression were dG4H = -0.71 and dCBT = -0.91. For loneliness, they were dG4H = -1.07 and dCBT = -0.89. At 12-month follow-up, the absolute difference between groups on depression was 1.176 (95% CI -1.94 to 4.29) and on loneliness it was -0.679 (95% CI -1.43 to 0.07). No adverse effects were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>G4H was non-inferior to CBT for depression and showed a slight advantage over CBT for loneliness that emerged after treatment completion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520791,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"140-147\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2021.128\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2021.128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20
摘要
背景:抑郁症治疗对年轻人的效果通常不如成年人。然而,治疗很少针对孤独,这是抑郁症发病、维持和发展的关键风险因素。目的:本研究评估了一种新的孤独感干预,4组健康(G4H),相对于认知行为疗法(CBT)的最佳实践治疗,在12个月的时间内减少孤独感和抑郁的疗效(澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册:ACTRN12618000440224)。方法:该研究是一项3期随机非劣效性试验,将G4H与剂量控制组CBT进行比较。参与者是174名年龄在15-25岁之间的人,他们经历过孤独和临床上明显的抑郁症状,他们没有接受辅助治疗。参与者是从澳大利亚昆士兰东南部的心理健康服务机构招募的。随机化采用计算机软件进行。随访评估和统计分析不考虑分配。两种干预措施都包括5次75分钟的小组心理治疗。主要结局是抑郁和孤独,抑郁的非劣效差为2.20。结果:该试验在2018年4月24日至2019年5月25日期间招募了174名参与者,其中84名为G4H组,90名为CBT组。所有随机受试者均纳入意向治疗分析(n = 174)。抑郁的前后效应量dG4H = -0.71, dCBT = -0.91。孤独感的dG4H = -1.07, dCBT = -0.89。在12个月的随访中,两组在抑郁方面的绝对差异为1.176 (95% CI -1.94至4.29),在孤独方面的绝对差异为-0.679 (95% CI -1.43至0.07)。未观察到不良反应。结论:G4H对抑郁症的治疗效果不逊于CBT,对治疗完成后出现的孤独感的治疗效果优于CBT。
Groups 4 Health versus cognitive-behavioural therapy for depression and loneliness in young people: randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial with 12-month follow-up.
Background: Depression treatments are typically less effective for young people than for adults. However, treatments rarely target loneliness, which is a key risk factor in the onset, maintenance and development of depression.
Aims: This study evaluated the efficacy of a novel loneliness intervention, Groups 4 Health (G4H), relative to the best-practice treatment of cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) in reducing loneliness and depression over a 12-month period (Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry: ACTRN12618000440224).
Method: The study was a phase 3 randomised non-inferiority trial comparing G4H with dose-controlled group CBT. Participants were 174 people aged 15-25 years experiencing loneliness and clinically significant symptoms of depression, who were not in receipt of adjunct treatment. Participants were recruited from mental health services in Southeast Queensland, Australia. Randomisation was conducted using computer software. Follow-up assessments and statistical analyses were masked to allocation. Both interventions consisted of five 75 min group-based psychotherapy sessions. The primary outcomes were depression and loneliness, with a non-inferiority margin of 2.20 for depression.
Results: The trial enrolled 174 participants between 24 April 2018 and 25 May 2019, with 84 in the G4H condition and 90 in the CBT condition. All randomised participants were included in the intention-to-treat analyses (n = 174). The pre-post effect sizes for depression were dG4H = -0.71 and dCBT = -0.91. For loneliness, they were dG4H = -1.07 and dCBT = -0.89. At 12-month follow-up, the absolute difference between groups on depression was 1.176 (95% CI -1.94 to 4.29) and on loneliness it was -0.679 (95% CI -1.43 to 0.07). No adverse effects were observed.
Conclusions: G4H was non-inferior to CBT for depression and showed a slight advantage over CBT for loneliness that emerged after treatment completion.