精神病的种族密度效应:一项系统回顾和多水平荟萃分析。

Sophie J Baker, Mike Jackson, Hannah Jongsma, Christopher W N Saville
{"title":"精神病的种族密度效应:一项系统回顾和多水平荟萃分析。","authors":"Sophie J Baker,&nbsp;Mike Jackson,&nbsp;Hannah Jongsma,&nbsp;Christopher W N Saville","doi":"10.1192/bjp.2021.96","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An 'ethnic' or 'group' density effect in psychosis has been observed, whereby the risk of psychosis in minority group individuals is inversely related to neighbourhood-level proportions of others belonging to the same group. However, there is conflicting evidence over whether this effect differs between minority groups and limited investigation into other moderators.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To conduct a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of the group density effect in psychosis and examine moderators.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Four databases were systematically searched. A narrative review was conducted and a three-level meta-analysis was performed. The potential moderating effect of crudely and specifically defined minority groups was assessed. Country, time, area size and whether studies used clinical or non-clinical outcomes were also tested as moderators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-two studies were included in the narrative review and ten in the meta-analysis. A 10 percentage-point decrease in own-group density was associated with a 20% increase in psychosis risk (OR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.09-1.32, P < 0.001). This was moderated by crudely defined minority groups (F6,68 = 6.86, P < 0.001), with the strongest associations observed in Black populations, followed by a White Other sample. Greater heterogeneity was observed when specific minority groups were assessed (F25,49 = 7.26, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first review to provide meta-analytic evidence that the risk of psychosis posed by lower own-group density varies across minority groups, with the strongest associations observed in Black individuals. Heterogeneity in effect sizes may reflect distinctive social experiences of specific minority groups. Potential mechanisms are discussed, along with the implications of findings and suggestions for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":520791,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science","volume":" ","pages":"632-643"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8636614/pdf/","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The ethnic density effect in psychosis: a systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Sophie J Baker,&nbsp;Mike Jackson,&nbsp;Hannah Jongsma,&nbsp;Christopher W N Saville\",\"doi\":\"10.1192/bjp.2021.96\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An 'ethnic' or 'group' density effect in psychosis has been observed, whereby the risk of psychosis in minority group individuals is inversely related to neighbourhood-level proportions of others belonging to the same group. However, there is conflicting evidence over whether this effect differs between minority groups and limited investigation into other moderators.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To conduct a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of the group density effect in psychosis and examine moderators.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Four databases were systematically searched. A narrative review was conducted and a three-level meta-analysis was performed. The potential moderating effect of crudely and specifically defined minority groups was assessed. Country, time, area size and whether studies used clinical or non-clinical outcomes were also tested as moderators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-two studies were included in the narrative review and ten in the meta-analysis. A 10 percentage-point decrease in own-group density was associated with a 20% increase in psychosis risk (OR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.09-1.32, P < 0.001). This was moderated by crudely defined minority groups (F6,68 = 6.86, P < 0.001), with the strongest associations observed in Black populations, followed by a White Other sample. Greater heterogeneity was observed when specific minority groups were assessed (F25,49 = 7.26, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first review to provide meta-analytic evidence that the risk of psychosis posed by lower own-group density varies across minority groups, with the strongest associations observed in Black individuals. Heterogeneity in effect sizes may reflect distinctive social experiences of specific minority groups. Potential mechanisms are discussed, along with the implications of findings and suggestions for future research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520791,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"632-643\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8636614/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2021.96\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2021.96","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

背景:已经观察到精神病的“种族”或“群体”密度效应,即少数群体个体的精神病风险与属于同一群体的其他人的社区水平比例呈负相关。然而,关于这种效应在少数群体之间是否不同以及对其他调节因子的有限调查存在矛盾的证据。目的:对精神病患者群体密度效应进行全面的系统回顾和荟萃分析,并检查调节因子。方法:系统检索4个数据库。进行叙述性回顾,并进行三级元分析。评估了粗略和具体定义的少数群体的潜在调节作用。国家、时间、面积大小以及研究是否使用临床或非临床结果也作为调节因素进行了测试。结果:32项研究被纳入叙述性综述,10项研究被纳入meta分析。自组密度降低10个百分点与精神病风险增加20%相关(OR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.09-1.32, P < 0.001)。这被粗略定义的少数群体所缓和(F6,68 = 6.86, P < 0.001),在黑人群体中观察到最强的关联,其次是白人其他样本。当评估特定的少数群体时,观察到更大的异质性(F25,49 = 7.26, P < 0.001)。结论:这是第一个提供荟萃分析证据的综述,表明低本群体密度引起的精神病风险在少数群体中有所不同,在黑人个体中观察到最强的关联。效应大小的异质性可能反映了特定少数群体的独特社会经验。讨论了潜在的机制,以及研究结果的含义和对未来研究的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The ethnic density effect in psychosis: a systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis.

The ethnic density effect in psychosis: a systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis.

The ethnic density effect in psychosis: a systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis.

The ethnic density effect in psychosis: a systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis.

Background: An 'ethnic' or 'group' density effect in psychosis has been observed, whereby the risk of psychosis in minority group individuals is inversely related to neighbourhood-level proportions of others belonging to the same group. However, there is conflicting evidence over whether this effect differs between minority groups and limited investigation into other moderators.

Aims: To conduct a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of the group density effect in psychosis and examine moderators.

Method: Four databases were systematically searched. A narrative review was conducted and a three-level meta-analysis was performed. The potential moderating effect of crudely and specifically defined minority groups was assessed. Country, time, area size and whether studies used clinical or non-clinical outcomes were also tested as moderators.

Results: Thirty-two studies were included in the narrative review and ten in the meta-analysis. A 10 percentage-point decrease in own-group density was associated with a 20% increase in psychosis risk (OR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.09-1.32, P < 0.001). This was moderated by crudely defined minority groups (F6,68 = 6.86, P < 0.001), with the strongest associations observed in Black populations, followed by a White Other sample. Greater heterogeneity was observed when specific minority groups were assessed (F25,49 = 7.26, P < 0.001).

Conclusions: This is the first review to provide meta-analytic evidence that the risk of psychosis posed by lower own-group density varies across minority groups, with the strongest associations observed in Black individuals. Heterogeneity in effect sizes may reflect distinctive social experiences of specific minority groups. Potential mechanisms are discussed, along with the implications of findings and suggestions for future research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信