比较吸入性炭疽动物模型和皮肤炭疽动物模型中蜂胶对肿瘤坏死因子α和丙二醛的影响。

Q4 Medicine
African Journal of Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2021-12-21 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.21010/Ajid.v16i1.1
Dhani Redhono Harioputro, Wisnu Sanjaya, Yulyani Werdiningsih
{"title":"比较吸入性炭疽动物模型和皮肤炭疽动物模型中蜂胶对肿瘤坏死因子α和丙二醛的影响。","authors":"Dhani Redhono Harioputro, Wisnu Sanjaya, Yulyani Werdiningsih","doi":"10.21010/Ajid.v16i1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inflammatory response and oxidative stress can be found in anthrax characterized by increased level of serum Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNF-α) and Malondialdehyde (MDA). The use of antibiotics in anthrax has been known to cause some disturbing side-effects, such as allergic reaction, nausea, vomiting, and antibiotic resistance. Thus, ethanolic extract of propolis (EEP) might be the alternative regimen, due to its anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties. This study aimed to compare the effects of ethanolic extract of propolis (EEP) on TNF-α and MDA between the inhalation and cutaneous anthrax animal model.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was an experimental study with a post-test-only control group design on 40 samples of <i>Rattus norvegicus</i>. Samples were randomized into 5 groups: control, inhalation anthrax model, inhalation anthrax model + EEP, cutaneous anthrax model, and cutaneous anthrax model + EEP. After 14 days, the level of TNF-α and MDA were measured. To compare the data, we used the <i>ANOVA</i> test continued by the <i>post-hoc Turkey test</i>.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results obtained showed that the level of TNF-α and MDA between the inhalation and cutaneous anthrax animal models treated with EEP were statistically different (p < 0.05). The P5 group showed the lowest level of TNF-α (6.822 ± 0.383 pg/ml) and MDA (2.717 ± 0.383 nmol/ml).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EEP has a better effect on reducing TNF-α and MDA in cutaneous anthrax animal models compared to the inhalation anthrax animal model.</p>","PeriodicalId":39108,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8751393/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMPARISON OF PROPOLIS EFFECTS ON TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR ALPHA AND MALONDIALDEHYDE BETWEEN INHALATION AND CUTANEOUS ANTHRAX ANIMAL MODELS.\",\"authors\":\"Dhani Redhono Harioputro, Wisnu Sanjaya, Yulyani Werdiningsih\",\"doi\":\"10.21010/Ajid.v16i1.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inflammatory response and oxidative stress can be found in anthrax characterized by increased level of serum Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNF-α) and Malondialdehyde (MDA). The use of antibiotics in anthrax has been known to cause some disturbing side-effects, such as allergic reaction, nausea, vomiting, and antibiotic resistance. Thus, ethanolic extract of propolis (EEP) might be the alternative regimen, due to its anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties. This study aimed to compare the effects of ethanolic extract of propolis (EEP) on TNF-α and MDA between the inhalation and cutaneous anthrax animal model.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was an experimental study with a post-test-only control group design on 40 samples of <i>Rattus norvegicus</i>. Samples were randomized into 5 groups: control, inhalation anthrax model, inhalation anthrax model + EEP, cutaneous anthrax model, and cutaneous anthrax model + EEP. After 14 days, the level of TNF-α and MDA were measured. To compare the data, we used the <i>ANOVA</i> test continued by the <i>post-hoc Turkey test</i>.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results obtained showed that the level of TNF-α and MDA between the inhalation and cutaneous anthrax animal models treated with EEP were statistically different (p < 0.05). The P5 group showed the lowest level of TNF-α (6.822 ± 0.383 pg/ml) and MDA (2.717 ± 0.383 nmol/ml).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EEP has a better effect on reducing TNF-α and MDA in cutaneous anthrax animal models compared to the inhalation anthrax animal model.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39108,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Journal of Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8751393/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Journal of Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21010/Ajid.v16i1.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21010/Ajid.v16i1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:炭疽病可引起炎症反应和氧化应激,其特征是血清肿瘤坏死因子α(TNF-α)和丙二醛(MDA)水平升高。众所周知,在炭疽病中使用抗生素会引起一些令人不安的副作用,如过敏反应、恶心、呕吐和抗生素耐药性。因此,蜂胶乙醇提取物(EEP)具有抗炎和抗氧化特性,可作为替代疗法。本研究旨在比较蜂胶乙醇提取物(EEP)对吸入性炭疽动物模型和皮肤炭疽动物模型的 TNF-α 和 MDA 的影响:这是一项实验研究,对 40 个鼠类样本进行了后测对照组设计。样本被随机分为 5 组:对照组、吸入性炭疽模型组、吸入性炭疽模型+EEP 组、皮肤炭疽模型组和皮肤炭疽模型+EEP 组。14 天后,测量 TNF-α 和 MDA 的水平。为了对数据进行比较,我们使用了方差分析,并进行了土耳其事后检验:结果表明,经 EEP 治疗的吸入性炭疽动物模型和皮肤炭疽动物模型的 TNF-α 和 MDA 水平存在统计学差异(P < 0.05)。P5组的TNF-α(6.822 ± 0.383 pg/ml)和MDA(2.717 ± 0.383 nmol/ml)水平最低:结论:与吸入性炭疽动物模型相比,EEP能更好地降低皮肤炭疽动物模型的TNF-α和MDA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

COMPARISON OF PROPOLIS EFFECTS ON TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR ALPHA AND MALONDIALDEHYDE BETWEEN INHALATION AND CUTANEOUS ANTHRAX ANIMAL MODELS.

COMPARISON OF PROPOLIS EFFECTS ON TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR ALPHA AND MALONDIALDEHYDE BETWEEN INHALATION AND CUTANEOUS ANTHRAX ANIMAL MODELS.

COMPARISON OF PROPOLIS EFFECTS ON TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR ALPHA AND MALONDIALDEHYDE BETWEEN INHALATION AND CUTANEOUS ANTHRAX ANIMAL MODELS.

Background: Inflammatory response and oxidative stress can be found in anthrax characterized by increased level of serum Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNF-α) and Malondialdehyde (MDA). The use of antibiotics in anthrax has been known to cause some disturbing side-effects, such as allergic reaction, nausea, vomiting, and antibiotic resistance. Thus, ethanolic extract of propolis (EEP) might be the alternative regimen, due to its anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties. This study aimed to compare the effects of ethanolic extract of propolis (EEP) on TNF-α and MDA between the inhalation and cutaneous anthrax animal model.

Materials and methods: This was an experimental study with a post-test-only control group design on 40 samples of Rattus norvegicus. Samples were randomized into 5 groups: control, inhalation anthrax model, inhalation anthrax model + EEP, cutaneous anthrax model, and cutaneous anthrax model + EEP. After 14 days, the level of TNF-α and MDA were measured. To compare the data, we used the ANOVA test continued by the post-hoc Turkey test.

Results: The results obtained showed that the level of TNF-α and MDA between the inhalation and cutaneous anthrax animal models treated with EEP were statistically different (p < 0.05). The P5 group showed the lowest level of TNF-α (6.822 ± 0.383 pg/ml) and MDA (2.717 ± 0.383 nmol/ml).

Conclusion: EEP has a better effect on reducing TNF-α and MDA in cutaneous anthrax animal models compared to the inhalation anthrax animal model.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
African Journal of Infectious Diseases
African Journal of Infectious Diseases Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信