新编制的12 ~ 71月龄婴幼儿神经发育迟缓综合评价量表效度初步报告

IF 0.8 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Minha Hong, Kyung-Sook Lee, Jin-Ah Park, Ji-Yeon Kang, Yong Woo Shin, Young Il Cho, Duk-Soo Moon, Seongwoo Cho, Ram Hwangbo, Seung Yup Lee, Geon Ho Bahn
{"title":"新编制的12 ~ 71月龄婴幼儿神经发育迟缓综合评价量表效度初步报告","authors":"Minha Hong,&nbsp;Kyung-Sook Lee,&nbsp;Jin-Ah Park,&nbsp;Ji-Yeon Kang,&nbsp;Yong Woo Shin,&nbsp;Young Il Cho,&nbsp;Duk-Soo Moon,&nbsp;Seongwoo Cho,&nbsp;Ram Hwangbo,&nbsp;Seung Yup Lee,&nbsp;Geon Ho Bahn","doi":"10.5765/jkacap.210033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Early detection of developmental issues in infants and necessary intervention are important. To identify the comorbid conditions, a comprehensive evaluation is required. The study's objectives were to 1) generate scale items by identifying and eliciting concepts relevant to young children (12-71 months) with developmental delays, 2) develop a comprehensive screening tool for developmental delay and comorbid conditions, and 3) assess the tool's validity and cut-off.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multidisciplinary experts devised the \"Infant Comprehensive Evaluation for Neurodevelopmental Delay (ICEND),\" an assessment method that comes in two versions depending on the age of the child: 12-36 months and 37-71 months, through monthly seminars and focused group interviews. The ICEND is composed of three parts: risk factors, resilience factors, and clinical scales. In parts 1 and 2, there were 41 caretakers responded to the questionnaires. Part 3 involved clinicians evaluating ten subscales using 98 and 114 questionnaires for younger and older versions, respectively. The Child Behavior Checklist, Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, Infant- Toddler Social Emotional Assessment, and Korean Developmental Screening Test for Infants and Children were employed to analyze concurrent validity with the ICEND. The analyses were performed on both typical and high-risk infants to identify concurrent validity, reliability, and cut-off scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 296 people participated in the study, with 57 of them being high-risk (19.2%). The Cronbach's alpha was positive (0.533-0.928). In the majority of domains, the ICEND demonstrated a fair discriminatory ability, with a sensitivity of 0.5-0.7 and specificity 0.7-0.9.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ICEND is reliable and valid, indicating its potential as an auxiliary tool for assessing neurodevelopmental delay and comorbid conditions in children aged 12-36 months and 37-71 months.</p>","PeriodicalId":42806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/62/0c/jkacap-33-1-16.PMC8733413.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preliminary Report of Validity for the Infant Comprehensive Evaluation for Neurodevelopmental Delay, a Newly Developed Inventory for Children Aged 12 to 71 Months.\",\"authors\":\"Minha Hong,&nbsp;Kyung-Sook Lee,&nbsp;Jin-Ah Park,&nbsp;Ji-Yeon Kang,&nbsp;Yong Woo Shin,&nbsp;Young Il Cho,&nbsp;Duk-Soo Moon,&nbsp;Seongwoo Cho,&nbsp;Ram Hwangbo,&nbsp;Seung Yup Lee,&nbsp;Geon Ho Bahn\",\"doi\":\"10.5765/jkacap.210033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Early detection of developmental issues in infants and necessary intervention are important. To identify the comorbid conditions, a comprehensive evaluation is required. The study's objectives were to 1) generate scale items by identifying and eliciting concepts relevant to young children (12-71 months) with developmental delays, 2) develop a comprehensive screening tool for developmental delay and comorbid conditions, and 3) assess the tool's validity and cut-off.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multidisciplinary experts devised the \\\"Infant Comprehensive Evaluation for Neurodevelopmental Delay (ICEND),\\\" an assessment method that comes in two versions depending on the age of the child: 12-36 months and 37-71 months, through monthly seminars and focused group interviews. The ICEND is composed of three parts: risk factors, resilience factors, and clinical scales. In parts 1 and 2, there were 41 caretakers responded to the questionnaires. Part 3 involved clinicians evaluating ten subscales using 98 and 114 questionnaires for younger and older versions, respectively. The Child Behavior Checklist, Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, Infant- Toddler Social Emotional Assessment, and Korean Developmental Screening Test for Infants and Children were employed to analyze concurrent validity with the ICEND. The analyses were performed on both typical and high-risk infants to identify concurrent validity, reliability, and cut-off scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 296 people participated in the study, with 57 of them being high-risk (19.2%). The Cronbach's alpha was positive (0.533-0.928). In the majority of domains, the ICEND demonstrated a fair discriminatory ability, with a sensitivity of 0.5-0.7 and specificity 0.7-0.9.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ICEND is reliable and valid, indicating its potential as an auxiliary tool for assessing neurodevelopmental delay and comorbid conditions in children aged 12-36 months and 37-71 months.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/62/0c/jkacap-33-1-16.PMC8733413.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5765/jkacap.210033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5765/jkacap.210033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:早期发现婴儿发育问题并进行必要的干预是很重要的。为了确定合并症,需要进行全面的评估。该研究的目标是:1)通过识别和引出与幼儿(12-71个月)发育迟缓相关的概念,生成量表项目;2)开发发育迟缓和合并症的综合筛查工具;3)评估工具的有效性和截止值。方法:多学科专家设计了“婴儿神经发育迟缓综合评估(ICEND)”,这是一种评估方法,根据儿童的年龄分为两个版本:12-36个月和37-71个月,通过每月研讨会和重点小组访谈。ICEND由风险因素、恢复力因素和临床量表三部分组成。在第一部分和第二部分中,有41名看护人回答了问卷。第3部分涉及临床医生评估10个子量表,分别使用98份和114份问卷对年轻人和老年人版本进行评估。采用儿童行为量表、优势与困难问卷、婴幼儿社会情绪评估量表和韩国婴幼儿发展筛选测验对ICEND进行并发效度分析。对典型和高危婴儿进行分析,以确定并发效度、信度和截止分数。结果:共有296人参与研究,其中57人为高危人群(19.2%)。Cronbach’s alpha为正(0.533 ~ 0.928)。在大多数领域,ICEND表现出公平的区分能力,敏感性为0.5-0.7,特异性为0.7-0.9。结论:ICEND是可靠和有效的,表明其有潜力作为评估12-36个月和37-71个月儿童神经发育迟缓和合并症的辅助工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preliminary Report of Validity for the Infant Comprehensive Evaluation for Neurodevelopmental Delay, a Newly Developed Inventory for Children Aged 12 to 71 Months.

Objectives: Early detection of developmental issues in infants and necessary intervention are important. To identify the comorbid conditions, a comprehensive evaluation is required. The study's objectives were to 1) generate scale items by identifying and eliciting concepts relevant to young children (12-71 months) with developmental delays, 2) develop a comprehensive screening tool for developmental delay and comorbid conditions, and 3) assess the tool's validity and cut-off.

Methods: Multidisciplinary experts devised the "Infant Comprehensive Evaluation for Neurodevelopmental Delay (ICEND)," an assessment method that comes in two versions depending on the age of the child: 12-36 months and 37-71 months, through monthly seminars and focused group interviews. The ICEND is composed of three parts: risk factors, resilience factors, and clinical scales. In parts 1 and 2, there were 41 caretakers responded to the questionnaires. Part 3 involved clinicians evaluating ten subscales using 98 and 114 questionnaires for younger and older versions, respectively. The Child Behavior Checklist, Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, Infant- Toddler Social Emotional Assessment, and Korean Developmental Screening Test for Infants and Children were employed to analyze concurrent validity with the ICEND. The analyses were performed on both typical and high-risk infants to identify concurrent validity, reliability, and cut-off scores.

Results: A total of 296 people participated in the study, with 57 of them being high-risk (19.2%). The Cronbach's alpha was positive (0.533-0.928). In the majority of domains, the ICEND demonstrated a fair discriminatory ability, with a sensitivity of 0.5-0.7 and specificity 0.7-0.9.

Conclusion: The ICEND is reliable and valid, indicating its potential as an auxiliary tool for assessing neurodevelopmental delay and comorbid conditions in children aged 12-36 months and 37-71 months.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信