通过持续质量改进措施进行新生儿手术疼痛管理的实践。

IF 1.3 Q3 PEDIATRICS
International Journal of Pediatrics Pub Date : 2022-02-13 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2022/8605071
Jigar P Thacker, Deep S Shah, Dipen V Patel, Somashekhar M Nimbalkar
{"title":"通过持续质量改进措施进行新生儿手术疼痛管理的实践。","authors":"Jigar P Thacker,&nbsp;Deep S Shah,&nbsp;Dipen V Patel,&nbsp;Somashekhar M Nimbalkar","doi":"10.1155/2022/8605071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although the benefits of pain control measures in neonates are well known, the actual usage was not optimal in our unit. Therefore, we implemented a quality improvement project to improve pain management practices through multiple Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Our project included hemodynamically stable newborns weighing ≥1300 g. We identified four common procedures: intravenous cannulation, venous sampling, heel prick, and nasogastric tube insertion. The selected pain control measures were skin-to-skin contact, breastfeeding, expressed breast milk orally, and oral sucrose. Between April 2019 and September 2019, we intervened multiple times and reassessed shortcomings. We encouraged evidence-based practices and gave solutions for shortcomings. Data were interpreted weekly to assess the compliance to pain control interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Minimal pain control measures (3-4%) were utilized for identified procedures before the project began. We could improve the use of pain control measures steadily and achieve the target of 80% of procedures after seven different interventions over five months. There was a retention of the effect on reassessing twice at second and fourth months of stopping further intervention once the target got achieved.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Quality Improvement science can identify the shortcomings and help to improve the compliance for pain control practices in neonates, as demonstrated in this neonatal unit.</p>","PeriodicalId":51591,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pediatrics","volume":"2022 ","pages":"8605071"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8858718/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Practices of Procedural Pain Management in Neonates through Continuous Quality Improvement Measures.\",\"authors\":\"Jigar P Thacker,&nbsp;Deep S Shah,&nbsp;Dipen V Patel,&nbsp;Somashekhar M Nimbalkar\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2022/8605071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although the benefits of pain control measures in neonates are well known, the actual usage was not optimal in our unit. Therefore, we implemented a quality improvement project to improve pain management practices through multiple Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Our project included hemodynamically stable newborns weighing ≥1300 g. We identified four common procedures: intravenous cannulation, venous sampling, heel prick, and nasogastric tube insertion. The selected pain control measures were skin-to-skin contact, breastfeeding, expressed breast milk orally, and oral sucrose. Between April 2019 and September 2019, we intervened multiple times and reassessed shortcomings. We encouraged evidence-based practices and gave solutions for shortcomings. Data were interpreted weekly to assess the compliance to pain control interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Minimal pain control measures (3-4%) were utilized for identified procedures before the project began. We could improve the use of pain control measures steadily and achieve the target of 80% of procedures after seven different interventions over five months. There was a retention of the effect on reassessing twice at second and fourth months of stopping further intervention once the target got achieved.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Quality Improvement science can identify the shortcomings and help to improve the compliance for pain control practices in neonates, as demonstrated in this neonatal unit.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51591,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\"2022 \",\"pages\":\"8605071\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8858718/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8605071\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8605071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:虽然新生儿疼痛控制措施的好处是众所周知的,但在我们单位的实际使用情况并不理想。因此,我们实施了一个质量改进项目,通过多个计划-执行-研究-行动(PDSA)循环来改进疼痛管理实践。方法:纳入血流动力学稳定、体重≥1300g的新生儿。我们确定了四种常见的治疗方法:静脉插管、静脉取样、足跟穿刺和鼻胃管插入。选择的疼痛控制措施是皮肤接触、母乳喂养、口服母乳和口服蔗糖。在2019年4月至2019年9月期间,我们多次干预并重新评估了不足之处。鼓励循证实践,改进不足之处。每周对数据进行解释,以评估对疼痛控制干预措施的依从性。结果:最小的疼痛控制措施(3-4%)在项目开始前用于确定的程序。我们可以稳步提高疼痛控制措施的使用,并在五个月内通过七种不同的干预措施实现80%的手术目标。一旦达到目标,在停止进一步干预的第二个月和第四个月重新评估两次的效果保持不变。结论:质量改进科学可以识别不足,并有助于提高新生儿疼痛控制实践的依从性,正如本新生儿病房所展示的那样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Practices of Procedural Pain Management in Neonates through Continuous Quality Improvement Measures.

Practices of Procedural Pain Management in Neonates through Continuous Quality Improvement Measures.

Practices of Procedural Pain Management in Neonates through Continuous Quality Improvement Measures.

Objective: Although the benefits of pain control measures in neonates are well known, the actual usage was not optimal in our unit. Therefore, we implemented a quality improvement project to improve pain management practices through multiple Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles.

Method: Our project included hemodynamically stable newborns weighing ≥1300 g. We identified four common procedures: intravenous cannulation, venous sampling, heel prick, and nasogastric tube insertion. The selected pain control measures were skin-to-skin contact, breastfeeding, expressed breast milk orally, and oral sucrose. Between April 2019 and September 2019, we intervened multiple times and reassessed shortcomings. We encouraged evidence-based practices and gave solutions for shortcomings. Data were interpreted weekly to assess the compliance to pain control interventions.

Results: Minimal pain control measures (3-4%) were utilized for identified procedures before the project began. We could improve the use of pain control measures steadily and achieve the target of 80% of procedures after seven different interventions over five months. There was a retention of the effect on reassessing twice at second and fourth months of stopping further intervention once the target got achieved.

Conclusion: Quality Improvement science can identify the shortcomings and help to improve the compliance for pain control practices in neonates, as demonstrated in this neonatal unit.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Pediatrics is a peer-reviewed, open access journal that publishes original researcharticles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of pediatric research. The journal accepts submissions presented as an original article, short communication, case report, review article, systematic review, or letter to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信