假定的异议?选择退出器官捐赠及排除器官及组织。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Nicola J Williams, Laura O'Donovan, Stephen Wilkinson
{"title":"假定的异议?选择退出器官捐赠及排除器官及组织。","authors":"Nicola J Williams,&nbsp;Laura O'Donovan,&nbsp;Stephen Wilkinson","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwac001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It is often claimed that a legitimate approach to organ donation is an opt-out system, also known as 'presumed consent', 'deemed consent', or 'deemed authorisation', whereby individuals are presumed or deemed willing to donate at least some of their organs and tissues after death unless they have explicitly refused permission. While sharing a default in favour of donation, such systems differ in several key respects, such as the role and importance assigned to the family members of prospective donors and their preferences, and exclusions and safeguards which often specify the demographic groups, purposes, or organs and tissues that will remain outside the scope of the opt-out system. Using the recent shift to opt-out in England, Scotland, and Northern Ireland as case studies, and by reference to the key goals motivating this shift across the UK, this article asks whether and, if so, why, and how, opt-out systems for post-mortem organ donation should restrict the types of organs and tissues for which consent is deemed. In other words, ought opt-out systems for PMOD presume dissent regarding the donation of certain organs and tissues?</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":" ","pages":"268-298"},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9155628/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Presumed Dissent? Opt-out Organ Donation and the Exclusion of Organs and Tissues.\",\"authors\":\"Nicola J Williams,&nbsp;Laura O'Donovan,&nbsp;Stephen Wilkinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/medlaw/fwac001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>It is often claimed that a legitimate approach to organ donation is an opt-out system, also known as 'presumed consent', 'deemed consent', or 'deemed authorisation', whereby individuals are presumed or deemed willing to donate at least some of their organs and tissues after death unless they have explicitly refused permission. While sharing a default in favour of donation, such systems differ in several key respects, such as the role and importance assigned to the family members of prospective donors and their preferences, and exclusions and safeguards which often specify the demographic groups, purposes, or organs and tissues that will remain outside the scope of the opt-out system. Using the recent shift to opt-out in England, Scotland, and Northern Ireland as case studies, and by reference to the key goals motivating this shift across the UK, this article asks whether and, if so, why, and how, opt-out systems for post-mortem organ donation should restrict the types of organs and tissues for which consent is deemed. In other words, ought opt-out systems for PMOD presume dissent regarding the donation of certain organs and tissues?</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"268-298\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9155628/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwac001\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwac001","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

人们经常声称,器官捐赠的合法途径是一种选择退出制度,也被称为“推定同意”,“视为同意”,或“视为授权”,即假定或视为个人愿意在死后捐赠至少部分器官和组织,除非他们明确拒绝许可。虽然这些制度都默认支持捐赠,但在几个关键方面有所不同,例如对潜在捐赠者的家庭成员的作用和重要性及其偏好,以及排除和保障措施,这些排除和保障措施通常规定了将留在选择退出制度范围之外的人口群体、目的或器官和组织。本文以最近英格兰、苏格兰和北爱尔兰选择退出的转变为案例研究,并参考推动整个英国这一转变的关键目标,询问是否,如果是,为什么,以及如何,死后器官捐赠的选择退出系统应该限制被视为同意的器官和组织的类型。换句话说,PMOD的选择退出系统是否应该假定对某些器官和组织的捐赠持不同意见?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Presumed Dissent? Opt-out Organ Donation and the Exclusion of Organs and Tissues.

Presumed Dissent? Opt-out Organ Donation and the Exclusion of Organs and Tissues.

Presumed Dissent? Opt-out Organ Donation and the Exclusion of Organs and Tissues.

It is often claimed that a legitimate approach to organ donation is an opt-out system, also known as 'presumed consent', 'deemed consent', or 'deemed authorisation', whereby individuals are presumed or deemed willing to donate at least some of their organs and tissues after death unless they have explicitly refused permission. While sharing a default in favour of donation, such systems differ in several key respects, such as the role and importance assigned to the family members of prospective donors and their preferences, and exclusions and safeguards which often specify the demographic groups, purposes, or organs and tissues that will remain outside the scope of the opt-out system. Using the recent shift to opt-out in England, Scotland, and Northern Ireland as case studies, and by reference to the key goals motivating this shift across the UK, this article asks whether and, if so, why, and how, opt-out systems for post-mortem organ donation should restrict the types of organs and tissues for which consent is deemed. In other words, ought opt-out systems for PMOD presume dissent regarding the donation of certain organs and tissues?

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信