Brandon A Levin, Daniel J Lama, Jonathan Sussman, Tianyuan Guan, Marepalli Rao, Juliana Tobler, Sadhna Verma, Abhinav Sidana
{"title":"用于诊断的活检类型是否影响前列腺癌患者的后续治疗选择?","authors":"Brandon A Levin, Daniel J Lama, Jonathan Sussman, Tianyuan Guan, Marepalli Rao, Juliana Tobler, Sadhna Verma, Abhinav Sidana","doi":"10.1080/13685538.2021.2023125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) targeted biopsy has emerged as an augmentation to systematic prostate biopsy (SBx) with improved diagnostic accuracy. The purpose of this study was to determine whether biopsy modality impacted management of prostate cancer (PCa).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective review of patients with newly diagnosed non-metastatic PCa at our institution (2014-2020). Either ultrasound-guided 12-core SBx or SBx plus ≥1targeted biopsy cores from identifiable lesions on mpMRI were performed. Patients were managed with active surveillance (AS), radiation therapy (RT), or radical prostatectomy (RP). Multivariate logistic and multinomial regression analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 578 patients, 221(38%) proceeded with AS, 121(21%) received RT, and 236(41%) underwent RP. Median age and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) were 65.4 years and 7.2 ng/mL, respectively. On multivariate analysis, biopsy type did not predict decision to pursue treatment (<i>p</i>=.951). On multinomial regression analysis, biopsy type did not predict selection of AS over RP (<i>p</i>=.973) or RT over RP (<i>p</i>=.813). Alternatively, age, grade group, and PSA were significant predictors of management selection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Biopsy technique did not impact management for patients with new PCa diagnosis. Despite paradigm shifts in obtaining tissue diagnosis, age, PSA, and grade group remain valuable indices for shared decision-making and counseling patients with PCa.</p>","PeriodicalId":55542,"journal":{"name":"Aging Male","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does the type of biopsy used for diagnosis impact subsequent treatment selection in prostate cancer patients?\",\"authors\":\"Brandon A Levin, Daniel J Lama, Jonathan Sussman, Tianyuan Guan, Marepalli Rao, Juliana Tobler, Sadhna Verma, Abhinav Sidana\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13685538.2021.2023125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) targeted biopsy has emerged as an augmentation to systematic prostate biopsy (SBx) with improved diagnostic accuracy. The purpose of this study was to determine whether biopsy modality impacted management of prostate cancer (PCa).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective review of patients with newly diagnosed non-metastatic PCa at our institution (2014-2020). Either ultrasound-guided 12-core SBx or SBx plus ≥1targeted biopsy cores from identifiable lesions on mpMRI were performed. Patients were managed with active surveillance (AS), radiation therapy (RT), or radical prostatectomy (RP). Multivariate logistic and multinomial regression analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 578 patients, 221(38%) proceeded with AS, 121(21%) received RT, and 236(41%) underwent RP. Median age and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) were 65.4 years and 7.2 ng/mL, respectively. On multivariate analysis, biopsy type did not predict decision to pursue treatment (<i>p</i>=.951). On multinomial regression analysis, biopsy type did not predict selection of AS over RP (<i>p</i>=.973) or RT over RP (<i>p</i>=.813). Alternatively, age, grade group, and PSA were significant predictors of management selection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Biopsy technique did not impact management for patients with new PCa diagnosis. Despite paradigm shifts in obtaining tissue diagnosis, age, PSA, and grade group remain valuable indices for shared decision-making and counseling patients with PCa.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aging Male\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aging Male\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13685538.2021.2023125\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging Male","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13685538.2021.2023125","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Does the type of biopsy used for diagnosis impact subsequent treatment selection in prostate cancer patients?
Purpose: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) targeted biopsy has emerged as an augmentation to systematic prostate biopsy (SBx) with improved diagnostic accuracy. The purpose of this study was to determine whether biopsy modality impacted management of prostate cancer (PCa).
Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients with newly diagnosed non-metastatic PCa at our institution (2014-2020). Either ultrasound-guided 12-core SBx or SBx plus ≥1targeted biopsy cores from identifiable lesions on mpMRI were performed. Patients were managed with active surveillance (AS), radiation therapy (RT), or radical prostatectomy (RP). Multivariate logistic and multinomial regression analyses were performed.
Results: Of 578 patients, 221(38%) proceeded with AS, 121(21%) received RT, and 236(41%) underwent RP. Median age and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) were 65.4 years and 7.2 ng/mL, respectively. On multivariate analysis, biopsy type did not predict decision to pursue treatment (p=.951). On multinomial regression analysis, biopsy type did not predict selection of AS over RP (p=.973) or RT over RP (p=.813). Alternatively, age, grade group, and PSA were significant predictors of management selection.
Conclusions: Biopsy technique did not impact management for patients with new PCa diagnosis. Despite paradigm shifts in obtaining tissue diagnosis, age, PSA, and grade group remain valuable indices for shared decision-making and counseling patients with PCa.
期刊介绍:
The Aging Male , the official journal of the International Society for the Study of the Aging Male, is a multidisciplinary publication covering all aspects of male health throughout the aging process. The Journal is a well-recognized and respected resource for anyone interested in keeping up to date with developments in this field. It is published quarterly in one volume per year.
The Journal publishes original peer-reviewed research papers as well as review papers and other appropriate educational material that provide researchers with an integrated perspective on this new, emerging specialty. Areas of interest include, but are not limited to:
Diagnosis and treatment of late-onset hypogonadism
Metabolic syndrome and related conditions
Treatment of erectile dysfunction and related disorders
Prostate cancer and benign prostate hyperplasia.