无症状献血者和卫生工作者SARS-CoV-2 IgG监测

Advances in Medicine Pub Date : 2021-12-29 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2021/2404170
Tulika Chandra, Devisha Agarwal, D Himanshu, Mallika Agarwal, Bipin Puri
{"title":"无症状献血者和卫生工作者SARS-CoV-2 IgG监测","authors":"Tulika Chandra,&nbsp;Devisha Agarwal,&nbsp;D Himanshu,&nbsp;Mallika Agarwal,&nbsp;Bipin Puri","doi":"10.1155/2021/2404170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>2085 blood donors were allowed to donate blood only after fulfilling all the criteria laid down by the FDA of India with additional history of excluding COVID-19 suspects. IgG antibody testing was performed by chemiluminescence, and results were noted along with their reactive status. Their reactive status was analyzed with donor information to get an idea of the risk parameters for COVID-19. Medical healthcare workers in whom the study was carried out were 560, out of which 114 had worked in COVID-19 duties and 446 had worked in non-COVID-19 emergencies areas. COVID-19 area duties were further subdivided into triage, holding area, isolation, and COVID-19-related duties. The samples were run on architect i2000 and evaluated for their plasma immunoglobulin G.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Amongst the asymptomatic blood donors, 1.9% was found to be COVID-19 IgG antibody positive. It was observed that maximum COVID-19 IgG positivity (57.1%) was seen in the age group 18-29 years followed by 26.2% in the age group 30-39 years. Donors in the age group 40-49 years showed antibody positivity of 16.7%, and no antibody-positive donors were found above 50 years of age. COVID-19 IgG positivity was maximum in replacement donors (61.9%) followed by family donors (28.6%) and least involuntary donors (0.6%) Blood donors who showed high IgG positivity were mainly of labor class. Antibody IgG testing on medical healthcare workers showed 2.3% positivity. The healthcare workers who were posted in COVID-19 duties showed 4.8% positivity in the holding area (waiting area with the treatment of patients till their RT PCR report comes) and 5.7% in other COVID-19 areas related to laboratory work. Healthcare workers doing duties in COVID-19 areas showed 2.7% positivity, while those doing duties in non-COVID-19 emergency areas showed a positivity of 2.2%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study shows that the prevalence of detectable antibodies was low in the general population in India and many patients were asymptomatic as seen in the blood donors, especially the labor class. Maximum exposure was present in young healthy males of labor class who remained asymptomatic. The healthcare workers were more exposed to COVID-19 as compared to the general population probably due to lack of precaution and awareness. Those doing non-COVID-19 duties were also exposed appreciably and needed to take all the precautions required for COVID-19 duties.</p>","PeriodicalId":53309,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8717046/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SARS-CoV-2 IgG Surveillance in Asymptomatic Blood Donors and Health Workers.\",\"authors\":\"Tulika Chandra,&nbsp;Devisha Agarwal,&nbsp;D Himanshu,&nbsp;Mallika Agarwal,&nbsp;Bipin Puri\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2021/2404170\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>2085 blood donors were allowed to donate blood only after fulfilling all the criteria laid down by the FDA of India with additional history of excluding COVID-19 suspects. IgG antibody testing was performed by chemiluminescence, and results were noted along with their reactive status. Their reactive status was analyzed with donor information to get an idea of the risk parameters for COVID-19. Medical healthcare workers in whom the study was carried out were 560, out of which 114 had worked in COVID-19 duties and 446 had worked in non-COVID-19 emergencies areas. COVID-19 area duties were further subdivided into triage, holding area, isolation, and COVID-19-related duties. The samples were run on architect i2000 and evaluated for their plasma immunoglobulin G.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Amongst the asymptomatic blood donors, 1.9% was found to be COVID-19 IgG antibody positive. It was observed that maximum COVID-19 IgG positivity (57.1%) was seen in the age group 18-29 years followed by 26.2% in the age group 30-39 years. Donors in the age group 40-49 years showed antibody positivity of 16.7%, and no antibody-positive donors were found above 50 years of age. COVID-19 IgG positivity was maximum in replacement donors (61.9%) followed by family donors (28.6%) and least involuntary donors (0.6%) Blood donors who showed high IgG positivity were mainly of labor class. Antibody IgG testing on medical healthcare workers showed 2.3% positivity. The healthcare workers who were posted in COVID-19 duties showed 4.8% positivity in the holding area (waiting area with the treatment of patients till their RT PCR report comes) and 5.7% in other COVID-19 areas related to laboratory work. Healthcare workers doing duties in COVID-19 areas showed 2.7% positivity, while those doing duties in non-COVID-19 emergency areas showed a positivity of 2.2%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study shows that the prevalence of detectable antibodies was low in the general population in India and many patients were asymptomatic as seen in the blood donors, especially the labor class. Maximum exposure was present in young healthy males of labor class who remained asymptomatic. The healthcare workers were more exposed to COVID-19 as compared to the general population probably due to lack of precaution and awareness. Those doing non-COVID-19 duties were also exposed appreciably and needed to take all the precautions required for COVID-19 duties.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8717046/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/2404170\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/2404170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

材料和方法:2085名献血者只有在满足印度FDA规定的所有标准并附加排除COVID-19疑似病史的情况下才允许献血。化学发光法检测IgG抗体,并记录检测结果和抗体的反应状态。结合供体信息分析其反应状态,以了解COVID-19的风险参数。参与研究的医疗卫生工作者560人,其中114人曾从事过COVID-19工作,446人曾在非COVID-19紧急地区工作。COVID-19区域职责进一步细分为分流、等待区、隔离和COVID-19相关职责。结果:无症状献血者中,COVID-19 IgG抗体阳性的比例为1.9%。结果显示,18-29岁年龄组COVID-19 IgG阳性率最高(57.1%),30-39岁年龄组阳性率次之(26.2%)。40 ~ 49岁的献血者抗体阳性占16.7%,50岁以上的献血者抗体阳性未见。新冠病毒IgG阳性以替代献血者最多(61.9%),其次为家庭献血者(28.6%),非自愿献血者最少(0.6%)。IgG阳性高的献血者以劳动阶层为主。医务人员抗体IgG检测阳性率为2.3%。在候诊区(等待患者治疗的区域,直到他们的RT - PCR报告到来)和其他与实验室工作相关的COVID-19区域,执岗的医护人员的阳性率分别为4.8%和5.7%。在新冠肺炎疫区执勤的医护人员阳性率为2.7%,而在非疫情紧急地区执勤的医护人员阳性率为2.2%。结论:我们的研究表明,在印度的一般人群中,可检测抗体的患病率很低,许多患者在献血者中无症状,尤其是劳动阶层。暴露量最大的是没有症状的年轻健康工人阶级男性。与普通人群相比,医护人员更容易接触到COVID-19,这可能是由于缺乏预防和意识。那些从事与COVID-19无关的工作的人员也明显受到感染,需要采取COVID-19工作所需的一切预防措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
SARS-CoV-2 IgG Surveillance in Asymptomatic Blood Donors and Health Workers.

Materials and methods: 2085 blood donors were allowed to donate blood only after fulfilling all the criteria laid down by the FDA of India with additional history of excluding COVID-19 suspects. IgG antibody testing was performed by chemiluminescence, and results were noted along with their reactive status. Their reactive status was analyzed with donor information to get an idea of the risk parameters for COVID-19. Medical healthcare workers in whom the study was carried out were 560, out of which 114 had worked in COVID-19 duties and 446 had worked in non-COVID-19 emergencies areas. COVID-19 area duties were further subdivided into triage, holding area, isolation, and COVID-19-related duties. The samples were run on architect i2000 and evaluated for their plasma immunoglobulin G.

Results: Amongst the asymptomatic blood donors, 1.9% was found to be COVID-19 IgG antibody positive. It was observed that maximum COVID-19 IgG positivity (57.1%) was seen in the age group 18-29 years followed by 26.2% in the age group 30-39 years. Donors in the age group 40-49 years showed antibody positivity of 16.7%, and no antibody-positive donors were found above 50 years of age. COVID-19 IgG positivity was maximum in replacement donors (61.9%) followed by family donors (28.6%) and least involuntary donors (0.6%) Blood donors who showed high IgG positivity were mainly of labor class. Antibody IgG testing on medical healthcare workers showed 2.3% positivity. The healthcare workers who were posted in COVID-19 duties showed 4.8% positivity in the holding area (waiting area with the treatment of patients till their RT PCR report comes) and 5.7% in other COVID-19 areas related to laboratory work. Healthcare workers doing duties in COVID-19 areas showed 2.7% positivity, while those doing duties in non-COVID-19 emergency areas showed a positivity of 2.2%.

Conclusion: Our study shows that the prevalence of detectable antibodies was low in the general population in India and many patients were asymptomatic as seen in the blood donors, especially the labor class. Maximum exposure was present in young healthy males of labor class who remained asymptomatic. The healthcare workers were more exposed to COVID-19 as compared to the general population probably due to lack of precaution and awareness. Those doing non-COVID-19 duties were also exposed appreciably and needed to take all the precautions required for COVID-19 duties.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信