不同发达非洲发展中国家临床研究的患者利益

IF 1.6 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Vanessa Strüver BA, MSc , Sheraz Ali PharmD, PhD Sch, MPH , Firas Fneish MSc , Gerhard Fortwengel BSc, MPH, PhD
{"title":"不同发达非洲发展中国家临床研究的患者利益","authors":"Vanessa Strüver BA, MSc ,&nbsp;Sheraz Ali PharmD, PhD Sch, MPH ,&nbsp;Firas Fneish MSc ,&nbsp;Gerhard Fortwengel BSc, MPH, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.curtheres.2021.100656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The globalization of clinical research should also benefit the population in developing markets. In this context, the approval of tested medicines and the associated expansion of medical care beyond clinical studies would be desirable as a possible long-term benefit.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This study was designed to compare the development of the number of clinical trials with the number of marketing authorizations of medicines on the African continent. To contrast these 2 parameters, the data were analyzed using the model of an ecological study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>To reflect the broad spectrum of African developing countries with diverse levels of development, the data collection was based on 2 geographically selected sample countries each from Central, North, East, West, and Southern Africa. Based on the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, the first step was to collect trends data on the development of the clinical trials in the 10 selected countries of the country list of the African Region published by the World Health Organization for the period 2015 to 2018. Subsequently, data on the current number of marketing authorizations of medicines in the selected sample countries were identified using the online registries of the national authorities. The data were utilized in comparative analyses.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Eight out of 10 model countries showed an increase in the number of clinical trials, with the exceptions of Cameroon and Libya, which showed an overall decline in research activity over the entire time. In direct comparison with drug registrations, the numbers indicate a similar development. The only exception here is Nigeria, a country with a solid performance in clinical research and yet a decrease in medicine registrations since 2015.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The expected increase in the development of clinical research as result of the globalization trend can basically be observed in most of the model countries. However, this increase does not guarantee an improvement in the number of medicine registrations. Although this is evident in some of the selected model countries, it cannot be projected to the entire African region. This may be linked to the diverse development of the individual countries due to the different political situations and the varying degrees of clinical research infrastructure. (<em>Curr Ther Res Clin Exp</em>. 2022; 82:XXX–XXX)</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10920,"journal":{"name":"Current Therapeutic Research-clinical and Experimental","volume":"96 ","pages":"Article 100656"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d5/bd/main.PMC8688875.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient Benefit of Clinical Research in Diversely Advanced African Developing Countries\",\"authors\":\"Vanessa Strüver BA, MSc ,&nbsp;Sheraz Ali PharmD, PhD Sch, MPH ,&nbsp;Firas Fneish MSc ,&nbsp;Gerhard Fortwengel BSc, MPH, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.curtheres.2021.100656\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The globalization of clinical research should also benefit the population in developing markets. In this context, the approval of tested medicines and the associated expansion of medical care beyond clinical studies would be desirable as a possible long-term benefit.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This study was designed to compare the development of the number of clinical trials with the number of marketing authorizations of medicines on the African continent. To contrast these 2 parameters, the data were analyzed using the model of an ecological study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>To reflect the broad spectrum of African developing countries with diverse levels of development, the data collection was based on 2 geographically selected sample countries each from Central, North, East, West, and Southern Africa. Based on the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, the first step was to collect trends data on the development of the clinical trials in the 10 selected countries of the country list of the African Region published by the World Health Organization for the period 2015 to 2018. Subsequently, data on the current number of marketing authorizations of medicines in the selected sample countries were identified using the online registries of the national authorities. The data were utilized in comparative analyses.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Eight out of 10 model countries showed an increase in the number of clinical trials, with the exceptions of Cameroon and Libya, which showed an overall decline in research activity over the entire time. In direct comparison with drug registrations, the numbers indicate a similar development. The only exception here is Nigeria, a country with a solid performance in clinical research and yet a decrease in medicine registrations since 2015.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The expected increase in the development of clinical research as result of the globalization trend can basically be observed in most of the model countries. However, this increase does not guarantee an improvement in the number of medicine registrations. Although this is evident in some of the selected model countries, it cannot be projected to the entire African region. This may be linked to the diverse development of the individual countries due to the different political situations and the varying degrees of clinical research infrastructure. (<em>Curr Ther Res Clin Exp</em>. 2022; 82:XXX–XXX)</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Therapeutic Research-clinical and Experimental\",\"volume\":\"96 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100656\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d5/bd/main.PMC8688875.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Therapeutic Research-clinical and Experimental\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0011393X21000345\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Therapeutic Research-clinical and Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0011393X21000345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

临床研究的全球化也应该使发展中市场的人口受益。在这种情况下,批准经试验的药物和相关的扩大临床研究以外的医疗保健将是可取的,这可能是一种长期利益。目的本研究旨在比较非洲大陆临床试验数量的发展与药物上市许可的数量。为了对比这两个参数,我们使用生态研究模型对数据进行了分析。方法为了反映具有不同发展水平的非洲发展中国家的广泛范围,数据收集基于中部、北部、东部、西部和南部非洲的2个地理上选择的样本国家。根据ClinicalTrials.gov注册表,第一步是收集2015年至2018年期间世界卫生组织公布的非洲区域国家名单中选定的10个国家开展临床试验的趋势数据。随后,利用国家主管部门的在线注册系统确定了选定样本国家当前药品上市许可数量的数据。这些数据被用于比较分析。结果在10个模式国家中,有8个国家的临床试验数量有所增加,但喀麦隆和利比亚除外,这两个国家的研究活动在整个时间内总体下降。与药品注册量直接比较,这些数字表明了类似的发展。唯一的例外是尼日利亚,这个国家在临床研究方面表现稳定,但自2015年以来药品注册数量有所下降。结论全球化趋势对临床研究发展的预期增长在大多数模式国家基本可以观察到。然而,这一增长并不能保证药品注册数量的改善。虽然这在一些选定的模范国家中是明显的,但它不能预测到整个非洲区域。这可能与各个国家由于不同的政治局势和不同程度的临床研究基础设施而导致的不同发展有关。(中国临床医学杂志,2022;82: XXX-XXX)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Patient Benefit of Clinical Research in Diversely Advanced African Developing Countries

Patient Benefit of Clinical Research in Diversely Advanced African Developing Countries

Patient Benefit of Clinical Research in Diversely Advanced African Developing Countries

Patient Benefit of Clinical Research in Diversely Advanced African Developing Countries

Background

The globalization of clinical research should also benefit the population in developing markets. In this context, the approval of tested medicines and the associated expansion of medical care beyond clinical studies would be desirable as a possible long-term benefit.

Objectives

This study was designed to compare the development of the number of clinical trials with the number of marketing authorizations of medicines on the African continent. To contrast these 2 parameters, the data were analyzed using the model of an ecological study.

Methods

To reflect the broad spectrum of African developing countries with diverse levels of development, the data collection was based on 2 geographically selected sample countries each from Central, North, East, West, and Southern Africa. Based on the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, the first step was to collect trends data on the development of the clinical trials in the 10 selected countries of the country list of the African Region published by the World Health Organization for the period 2015 to 2018. Subsequently, data on the current number of marketing authorizations of medicines in the selected sample countries were identified using the online registries of the national authorities. The data were utilized in comparative analyses.

Results

Eight out of 10 model countries showed an increase in the number of clinical trials, with the exceptions of Cameroon and Libya, which showed an overall decline in research activity over the entire time. In direct comparison with drug registrations, the numbers indicate a similar development. The only exception here is Nigeria, a country with a solid performance in clinical research and yet a decrease in medicine registrations since 2015.

Conclusions

The expected increase in the development of clinical research as result of the globalization trend can basically be observed in most of the model countries. However, this increase does not guarantee an improvement in the number of medicine registrations. Although this is evident in some of the selected model countries, it cannot be projected to the entire African region. This may be linked to the diverse development of the individual countries due to the different political situations and the varying degrees of clinical research infrastructure. (Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2022; 82:XXX–XXX)

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: We also encourage the submission of manuscripts presenting preclinical and very preliminary research that may stimulate further investigation of potentially relevant findings, as well as in-depth review articles on specific therapies or disease states, and applied health delivery or pharmacoeconomics. CTR encourages and supports the submission of manuscripts describing: • Interventions designed to understand or improve human health, disease treatment or disease prevention; • Studies that focus on problems that are uncommon in resource-rich countries; • Research that is "under-published" because of limited access to monetary resources such as English language support and Open Access fees (CTR offers deeply discounted English language editing); • Republication of articles previously published in non-English journals (eg, evidence-based guidelines) which could be useful if translated into English; • Preclinical and clinical product development studies that are not pursued for further investigation based upon early phase results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信