芬戈莫德与富马酸二甲酯治疗多发性硬化症的疗效比较一项24个月的随访研究。

IF 1.4 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY
American journal of clinical and experimental immunology Pub Date : 2021-10-15 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01
Samane-Sadat Masjedi, Masoud Etemadifar, Nadia Mohammad Zadeh, Mahdieh Afzali
{"title":"芬戈莫德与富马酸二甲酯治疗多发性硬化症的疗效比较一项24个月的随访研究。","authors":"Samane-Sadat Masjedi,&nbsp;Masoud Etemadifar,&nbsp;Nadia Mohammad Zadeh,&nbsp;Mahdieh Afzali","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oral treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) using disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) is a challenge worldwide. Fingolimod (FTY) and dimethyl fumarate (DMF) are two approved agents for oral treatment of MS with remarkable efficacy for relapse control and deceleration of disability progression. Therefore, the current study was done to compare disability control, lesions in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and adverse effects between the patients treated with FTY and DMF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized clinical trial (IR.MUI.REC.1396.3.786) was conducted on 60 patients who were randomly divided into two groups of treatment with 0.5 mg daily dose of FTY (n = 30) and 240 mg dose of DMF twice daily (n = 30). Disability of patients was assessed using the expanded disability status scale (EDSS) within 6 weeks, 12, and 24 months following treatment initiation and MRI was performed for all the patients prior to study initiation and within 24 months. Obtained data were compared between two study groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference between two treatment groups based on EDSS scores, brain lesions in MRI, and newly formed plaques (P>0.05). Skin and gastrointestinal-related complaints were the most common adverse effects of DMF while the increase in liver enzyme level and thrombocytopenia were the most common complications of FTY, respectively (<i>P</i>-value = 0.22).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to our findings, within 24-month follow-up, DMF was neither superior nor inferior to FTY comparing MRI lesions, EDSS scores, and adverse effects. Although, further evaluations with larger sample size are recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":72163,"journal":{"name":"American journal of clinical and experimental immunology","volume":"10 3","pages":"86-92"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8610802/pdf/ajcei0010-0086.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of fingolimod versus dimethyl fumarate for the treatment of multiple sclerosis; a 24-month follow-up study.\",\"authors\":\"Samane-Sadat Masjedi,&nbsp;Masoud Etemadifar,&nbsp;Nadia Mohammad Zadeh,&nbsp;Mahdieh Afzali\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oral treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) using disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) is a challenge worldwide. Fingolimod (FTY) and dimethyl fumarate (DMF) are two approved agents for oral treatment of MS with remarkable efficacy for relapse control and deceleration of disability progression. Therefore, the current study was done to compare disability control, lesions in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and adverse effects between the patients treated with FTY and DMF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized clinical trial (IR.MUI.REC.1396.3.786) was conducted on 60 patients who were randomly divided into two groups of treatment with 0.5 mg daily dose of FTY (n = 30) and 240 mg dose of DMF twice daily (n = 30). Disability of patients was assessed using the expanded disability status scale (EDSS) within 6 weeks, 12, and 24 months following treatment initiation and MRI was performed for all the patients prior to study initiation and within 24 months. Obtained data were compared between two study groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference between two treatment groups based on EDSS scores, brain lesions in MRI, and newly formed plaques (P>0.05). Skin and gastrointestinal-related complaints were the most common adverse effects of DMF while the increase in liver enzyme level and thrombocytopenia were the most common complications of FTY, respectively (<i>P</i>-value = 0.22).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to our findings, within 24-month follow-up, DMF was neither superior nor inferior to FTY comparing MRI lesions, EDSS scores, and adverse effects. Although, further evaluations with larger sample size are recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of clinical and experimental immunology\",\"volume\":\"10 3\",\"pages\":\"86-92\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8610802/pdf/ajcei0010-0086.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of clinical and experimental immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of clinical and experimental immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:口服治疗多发性硬化症(MS)使用疾病改善疗法(dmt)是一个全球性的挑战。Fingolimod (FTY)和富马酸二甲酯(DMF)是两种被批准用于口服治疗多发性硬化症的药物,在控制复发和减缓残疾进展方面疗效显著。因此,本研究比较了FTY和DMF患者的残疾控制、磁共振成像(MRI)病变和不良反应。方法:随机临床试验(IR.MUI.REC.1396.3.786) 60例患者,随机分为两组,分别给予0.5 mg / d (n = 30)和240 mg / d (n = 30)两组。在治疗开始后的6周、12和24个月内,使用扩展残疾状态量表(EDSS)评估患者的残疾,并在研究开始前和24个月内对所有患者进行MRI检查。将获得的数据在两个研究组之间进行比较。结果:两组患者EDSS评分、MRI脑病变、新形成斑块比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。DMF最常见的不良反应是皮肤和胃肠道相关的不适,而肝酶水平升高和血小板减少是FTY最常见的并发症,p值= 0.22。结论:根据我们的发现,在24个月的随访中,比较MRI病变、EDSS评分和不良反应,DMF既不优于也不逊于FTY。虽然,进一步的评估更大的样本量的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of fingolimod versus dimethyl fumarate for the treatment of multiple sclerosis; a 24-month follow-up study.

Background: Oral treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) using disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) is a challenge worldwide. Fingolimod (FTY) and dimethyl fumarate (DMF) are two approved agents for oral treatment of MS with remarkable efficacy for relapse control and deceleration of disability progression. Therefore, the current study was done to compare disability control, lesions in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and adverse effects between the patients treated with FTY and DMF.

Methods: This randomized clinical trial (IR.MUI.REC.1396.3.786) was conducted on 60 patients who were randomly divided into two groups of treatment with 0.5 mg daily dose of FTY (n = 30) and 240 mg dose of DMF twice daily (n = 30). Disability of patients was assessed using the expanded disability status scale (EDSS) within 6 weeks, 12, and 24 months following treatment initiation and MRI was performed for all the patients prior to study initiation and within 24 months. Obtained data were compared between two study groups.

Results: There was no significant difference between two treatment groups based on EDSS scores, brain lesions in MRI, and newly formed plaques (P>0.05). Skin and gastrointestinal-related complaints were the most common adverse effects of DMF while the increase in liver enzyme level and thrombocytopenia were the most common complications of FTY, respectively (P-value = 0.22).

Conclusion: According to our findings, within 24-month follow-up, DMF was neither superior nor inferior to FTY comparing MRI lesions, EDSS scores, and adverse effects. Although, further evaluations with larger sample size are recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信