了解莫桑比克中部古鲁埃地区以农业为基础的家庭的粮食安全驱动因素。

IF 5.4 Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Agriculture and Food Security Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-02-02 DOI:10.1186/s40066-021-00344-3
Custodio Matavel, Harry Hoffmann, Constance Rybak, Jonathan Steinke, Stefan Sieber, Klaus Müller
{"title":"了解莫桑比克中部古鲁埃地区以农业为基础的家庭的粮食安全驱动因素。","authors":"Custodio Matavel, Harry Hoffmann, Constance Rybak, Jonathan Steinke, Stefan Sieber, Klaus Müller","doi":"10.1186/s40066-021-00344-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prevalence of food insecurity in Mozambique is alarming, despite progress made during the 2010s. Several studies apply different proxy indicators of food security (FS) to assess the FS situation. However, these studies overlook the factors affecting FS, using only a single data point that results in an incomplete picture of FS. Food security is expected to fluctuate, being better and worse than what studies suggest. Using a sample of 296 households to assess FS, key drivers conditioning households' capacity to achieve FS in Gurué District, Central Mozambique, are identified. Data were collected in the pre-harvest period and during the harvest period to capture relevant interseasonal variation of FS. Household FS is assessed using three standard indicators: Household Dietary Diversity Score (HDDS), Household Food Consumption Score (HFCS), and Months of Adequate Household Food Provisioning (MAHFP).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Each household was classified into a specific FS status depending on the indicator applied. Generally, most households were classified as being severely or moderately food insecure during the pre-harvest season, while during the harvest season, medium and high levels of FS predominated. Nevertheless, varying outcomes were found depending on the indicator used to assess FS. MAHFP and HDDS are more related to the consumption of farm-sourced food, while HFCS responds more strongly to purchased food. Gender and age of the household head, geographic location, size and quality of land, staples production (especially cassava), livestock and crop diversity, as well as cash crops had a statistically significant effect on FS indicators.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study concludes that the decision whether farmers should rely on staple foods production for increasing their FS status or specialize on cash crops production to generate income and buy food depends on the indicator used to assess FS, since each indicator captures a specific domain of food security. Thus, one central recommendation derived from our results is that policy makers should promote a balance between market-oriented agriculture and subsistence production to achieve FS.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40066-021-00344-3.</p>","PeriodicalId":55858,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture and Food Security","volume":" ","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8807014/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the drivers of food security among agriculture-based households in Gurué District, Central Mozambique.\",\"authors\":\"Custodio Matavel, Harry Hoffmann, Constance Rybak, Jonathan Steinke, Stefan Sieber, Klaus Müller\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40066-021-00344-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prevalence of food insecurity in Mozambique is alarming, despite progress made during the 2010s. Several studies apply different proxy indicators of food security (FS) to assess the FS situation. However, these studies overlook the factors affecting FS, using only a single data point that results in an incomplete picture of FS. Food security is expected to fluctuate, being better and worse than what studies suggest. Using a sample of 296 households to assess FS, key drivers conditioning households' capacity to achieve FS in Gurué District, Central Mozambique, are identified. Data were collected in the pre-harvest period and during the harvest period to capture relevant interseasonal variation of FS. Household FS is assessed using three standard indicators: Household Dietary Diversity Score (HDDS), Household Food Consumption Score (HFCS), and Months of Adequate Household Food Provisioning (MAHFP).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Each household was classified into a specific FS status depending on the indicator applied. Generally, most households were classified as being severely or moderately food insecure during the pre-harvest season, while during the harvest season, medium and high levels of FS predominated. Nevertheless, varying outcomes were found depending on the indicator used to assess FS. MAHFP and HDDS are more related to the consumption of farm-sourced food, while HFCS responds more strongly to purchased food. Gender and age of the household head, geographic location, size and quality of land, staples production (especially cassava), livestock and crop diversity, as well as cash crops had a statistically significant effect on FS indicators.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study concludes that the decision whether farmers should rely on staple foods production for increasing their FS status or specialize on cash crops production to generate income and buy food depends on the indicator used to assess FS, since each indicator captures a specific domain of food security. Thus, one central recommendation derived from our results is that policy makers should promote a balance between market-oriented agriculture and subsistence production to achieve FS.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40066-021-00344-3.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55858,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agriculture and Food Security\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8807014/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agriculture and Food Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-021-00344-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/2/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture and Food Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-021-00344-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管莫桑比克在 2010 年代取得了一些进展,但其普遍存在的粮食不安全问题仍令人担忧。一些研究采用了不同的粮食安全(FS)替代指标来评估粮食安全状况。然而,这些研究忽略了影响粮食安全的因素,仅使用单一数据点,导致对粮食安全的描述不完整。预计粮食安全状况会有所波动,好于研究结果,也会差于研究结果。通过对 296 户家庭的抽样调查,确定了影响莫桑比克中部古鲁埃地区家庭实现粮食安全能力的关键因素。数据在收获前和收获期间收集,以捕捉家庭财务状况的相关季节间变化。家庭食物安全使用三个标准指标进行评估:家庭膳食多样性得分(HDDS)、家庭食物消费得分(HFCS)和家庭食物供应充足月数(MAHFP):根据所采用的指标,每个家庭都被划分为特定的食物供给状况。一般来说,在收获前的季节,大多数家庭被归类为严重或中度粮食不安全,而在收获季节,中度和高度粮食不安全的家庭占多数。然而,根据用于评估粮食不安全状况的指标不同,结果也不尽相同。MAHFP 和 HDDS 与农场来源食物的消费关系更大,而 HFCS 与购买食物的关系更大。户主的性别和年龄、地理位置、土地的面积和质量、主食产量(尤其是木薯)、牲畜和作物多样性以及经济作物对粮食安全指标有显著的统计学影响:研究得出的结论是,农民是应该依靠主食生产来提高其粮食安全状况,还是应该专门从事经济作物生产来创收和购买粮食,这取决于用于评估粮食安全的指标,因为每个指标都反映了粮食安全的一个特定领域。因此,从我们的研究结果中得出的一个核心建议是,政策制定者应促进以市场为导向的农业和自给性生产之间的平衡,以实现粮食安全:在线版本包含补充材料,见 10.1186/s40066-021-00344-3。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Understanding the drivers of food security among agriculture-based households in Gurué District, Central Mozambique.

Understanding the drivers of food security among agriculture-based households in Gurué District, Central Mozambique.

Understanding the drivers of food security among agriculture-based households in Gurué District, Central Mozambique.

Understanding the drivers of food security among agriculture-based households in Gurué District, Central Mozambique.

Background: The prevalence of food insecurity in Mozambique is alarming, despite progress made during the 2010s. Several studies apply different proxy indicators of food security (FS) to assess the FS situation. However, these studies overlook the factors affecting FS, using only a single data point that results in an incomplete picture of FS. Food security is expected to fluctuate, being better and worse than what studies suggest. Using a sample of 296 households to assess FS, key drivers conditioning households' capacity to achieve FS in Gurué District, Central Mozambique, are identified. Data were collected in the pre-harvest period and during the harvest period to capture relevant interseasonal variation of FS. Household FS is assessed using three standard indicators: Household Dietary Diversity Score (HDDS), Household Food Consumption Score (HFCS), and Months of Adequate Household Food Provisioning (MAHFP).

Results: Each household was classified into a specific FS status depending on the indicator applied. Generally, most households were classified as being severely or moderately food insecure during the pre-harvest season, while during the harvest season, medium and high levels of FS predominated. Nevertheless, varying outcomes were found depending on the indicator used to assess FS. MAHFP and HDDS are more related to the consumption of farm-sourced food, while HFCS responds more strongly to purchased food. Gender and age of the household head, geographic location, size and quality of land, staples production (especially cassava), livestock and crop diversity, as well as cash crops had a statistically significant effect on FS indicators.

Conclusions: The study concludes that the decision whether farmers should rely on staple foods production for increasing their FS status or specialize on cash crops production to generate income and buy food depends on the indicator used to assess FS, since each indicator captures a specific domain of food security. Thus, one central recommendation derived from our results is that policy makers should promote a balance between market-oriented agriculture and subsistence production to achieve FS.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40066-021-00344-3.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agriculture and Food Security
Agriculture and Food Security Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Agriculture & Food Security is a peer-reviewed open access journal that addresses the challenge of global food security. It publishes articles within the field of food security research, with a particular focus on research that may inform more sustainable agriculture and food systems that better address local, regional, national and/or global food and nutritional insecurity. The journal considers cutting-edge contributions across the breadth of relevant academic disciplines, including agricultural, ecological, environmental, nutritional, and socio-economic sciences, public health and policy. The scope of the journal includes, but is not limited to: -Agricultural and environmental sciences, including genetics and systems ecology- Animal husbandry, fisheries science and plant science- Global change, biodiversity, climatology and abiotic stresses- Food technology and balancing agricultural outputs across food, feed, fibre and fuel- Economics, information sciences and decision theory- Strategies for the implementation of new policies and practices- Public health in relation to the condition of food and nutritional security. The pioneering advances in research reported in Agriculture & Food Security have far reaching implications both for the developing world and for sustainability in the developed world. The published articles are accessible not only to researchers, but are also of special interest to the wider community of farmers, development and public health workers, policy makers and the general public.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信