支持儿科风湿病护理合作生产的电子仪表板的共同设计:以人为本的设计和可用性测试。

Q2 Medicine
Alysha Taxter, Lisa Johnson, Doreen Tabussi, Yukiko Kimura, Brittany Donaldson, Erica Lawson, Vincent Del Gaizo, Daniela Vitelli, Corinne Pinter, Aricca Van Citters, Eugene Nelson, Tzielan Lee
{"title":"支持儿科风湿病护理合作生产的电子仪表板的共同设计:以人为本的设计和可用性测试。","authors":"Alysha Taxter,&nbsp;Lisa Johnson,&nbsp;Doreen Tabussi,&nbsp;Yukiko Kimura,&nbsp;Brittany Donaldson,&nbsp;Erica Lawson,&nbsp;Vincent Del Gaizo,&nbsp;Daniela Vitelli,&nbsp;Corinne Pinter,&nbsp;Aricca Van Citters,&nbsp;Eugene Nelson,&nbsp;Tzielan Lee","doi":"10.2196/34735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The coproduction of care involves patients and families partnering with their clinicians and care teams, with the premise that each brings their own perspective, knowledge, and expertise, as well as their own values, goals, and preferences, to the partnership. Dashboards can display meaningful patient and clinical data to assess how a patient is doing and inform shared decision-making. Increasing communication between patients and care teams is particularly important for children with chronic conditions. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), the most common chronic pediatric rheumatic condition, is associated with increased pain, decreased function, and decreased quality of life.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to design a dashboard prototype for use in coproducing care in patients with JIA. We evaluated the use and needs of end users, obtained a consensus on the necessary dashboard data elements, and constructed display prototypes to inform meaningful discussions for coproduction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A human-centered design approach involving parents, patients, clinicians, and care team members was used to develop a dashboard to support the coproduction of care in 4 ambulatory pediatric rheumatology clinics. We engaged a multidisciplinary team (n=18) of patients, parents, clinicians, nurses, and staff during an in-person kick-off meeting followed by biweekly meetings. We also leveraged advisory panels. Teams mapped workflows and patient journeys, created personas, and developed dashboard sketches. The final dashboard components were determined via Delphi consensus voting. Low-tech dashboard testing was completed during clinic visits, and visual display prototypes were iterated by using the Plan-Do-Study-Act methodology. Patients and clinicians were surveyed regarding their experiences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Teams achieved consensus on what data mattered most at the point of care to support patients with JIA, families, and clinicians collaborating to make the best possible health care decisions. Notable themes included the right data in the right place at the right time, data in once for multiple purposes, patient and family self-management components, and the opportunity for education and increased transparency. A final set of 11 dashboard data elements was identified, including patient-reported outcomes, clinical data, and medications. Important design considerations featured the incorporation of real-time data, clearly labeled graphs, and vertical orientation to facilitate review and discussion. Prototype paper-testing with 36 patients and families yielded positive feedback, with 89% (8/9) to 100% (9/9) of parents (n=9) and 80% (8/10) to 90% (9/10) of clinicians (n=10) strongly agreeing or agreeing that the dashboard was useful during clinic discussions, helped to talk about what mattered most, and informed health care decision-making.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We developed a dashboard prototype that displays patient-reported and clinical data over time, along with medications that can be used during a clinic visit to support meaningful conversations and shared decision-making among patients with JIA, their families, and their clinicians and care teams.</p>","PeriodicalId":36208,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Participatory Medicine","volume":"14 1","pages":"e34735"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9077505/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Co-design of an Electronic Dashboard to Support the Coproduction of Care in Pediatric Rheumatic Disease: Human-Centered Design and Usability Testing.\",\"authors\":\"Alysha Taxter,&nbsp;Lisa Johnson,&nbsp;Doreen Tabussi,&nbsp;Yukiko Kimura,&nbsp;Brittany Donaldson,&nbsp;Erica Lawson,&nbsp;Vincent Del Gaizo,&nbsp;Daniela Vitelli,&nbsp;Corinne Pinter,&nbsp;Aricca Van Citters,&nbsp;Eugene Nelson,&nbsp;Tzielan Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/34735\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The coproduction of care involves patients and families partnering with their clinicians and care teams, with the premise that each brings their own perspective, knowledge, and expertise, as well as their own values, goals, and preferences, to the partnership. Dashboards can display meaningful patient and clinical data to assess how a patient is doing and inform shared decision-making. Increasing communication between patients and care teams is particularly important for children with chronic conditions. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), the most common chronic pediatric rheumatic condition, is associated with increased pain, decreased function, and decreased quality of life.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to design a dashboard prototype for use in coproducing care in patients with JIA. We evaluated the use and needs of end users, obtained a consensus on the necessary dashboard data elements, and constructed display prototypes to inform meaningful discussions for coproduction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A human-centered design approach involving parents, patients, clinicians, and care team members was used to develop a dashboard to support the coproduction of care in 4 ambulatory pediatric rheumatology clinics. We engaged a multidisciplinary team (n=18) of patients, parents, clinicians, nurses, and staff during an in-person kick-off meeting followed by biweekly meetings. We also leveraged advisory panels. Teams mapped workflows and patient journeys, created personas, and developed dashboard sketches. The final dashboard components were determined via Delphi consensus voting. Low-tech dashboard testing was completed during clinic visits, and visual display prototypes were iterated by using the Plan-Do-Study-Act methodology. Patients and clinicians were surveyed regarding their experiences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Teams achieved consensus on what data mattered most at the point of care to support patients with JIA, families, and clinicians collaborating to make the best possible health care decisions. Notable themes included the right data in the right place at the right time, data in once for multiple purposes, patient and family self-management components, and the opportunity for education and increased transparency. A final set of 11 dashboard data elements was identified, including patient-reported outcomes, clinical data, and medications. Important design considerations featured the incorporation of real-time data, clearly labeled graphs, and vertical orientation to facilitate review and discussion. Prototype paper-testing with 36 patients and families yielded positive feedback, with 89% (8/9) to 100% (9/9) of parents (n=9) and 80% (8/10) to 90% (9/10) of clinicians (n=10) strongly agreeing or agreeing that the dashboard was useful during clinic discussions, helped to talk about what mattered most, and informed health care decision-making.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We developed a dashboard prototype that displays patient-reported and clinical data over time, along with medications that can be used during a clinic visit to support meaningful conversations and shared decision-making among patients with JIA, their families, and their clinicians and care teams.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36208,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Participatory Medicine\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"e34735\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9077505/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Participatory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/34735\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Participatory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/34735","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:共同护理涉及患者和家属与其临床医生和护理团队合作,前提是每个人都将自己的观点、知识和专业知识以及自己的价值观、目标和偏好带入合作伙伴关系。仪表板可以显示有意义的患者和临床数据,以评估患者的情况,并为共同决策提供信息。增加患者和护理团队之间的沟通对患有慢性疾病的儿童尤为重要。青少年特发性关节炎(JIA)是最常见的儿童慢性风湿病,与疼痛增加、功能下降和生活质量下降有关。目的:本研究的目的是设计一个仪表板原型,用于JIA患者的共同护理。我们评估了最终用户的使用和需求,在必要的仪表板数据元素上获得了共识,并构建了显示原型,为合作生产提供有意义的讨论。方法:采用以人为中心的设计方法,包括家长、患者、临床医生和护理团队成员,开发一个仪表板,以支持4个儿科风湿病门诊的共同护理。我们召集了一个由患者、家长、临床医生、护士和工作人员组成的多学科团队(n=18),在一次面对面的启动会议上,随后每两周召开一次会议。我们还利用了顾问小组。团队绘制工作流程和病人旅程,创建人物角色,并开发仪表板草图。最终的仪表板组件是通过德尔菲共识投票确定的。在诊所访问期间完成低技术仪表板测试,并使用计划-执行-研究-行动方法迭代视觉显示原型。对患者和临床医生的经历进行了调查。结果:团队就护理点上最重要的数据达成共识,以支持JIA患者、家属和临床医生合作做出尽可能最佳的医疗保健决策。值得注意的主题包括正确的数据在正确的时间在正确的地点,一次数据用于多种目的,患者和家庭自我管理组件,以及教育和增加透明度的机会。最终确定了11个仪表板数据元素,包括患者报告的结果、临床数据和药物。重要的设计考虑是结合实时数据,清晰标记的图形,以及垂直方向,以促进审查和讨论。对36名患者和家属进行的原型纸测试获得了积极的反馈,89%(8/9)到100%(9/9)的家长(n=9)和80%(8/10)到90%(9/10)的临床医生(n=10)强烈同意或同意仪表板在临床讨论中是有用的,有助于讨论最重要的事情,并为医疗保健决策提供信息。结论:我们开发了一个仪表板原型,可以显示患者报告和临床数据随时间的变化,以及可以在诊所访问期间使用的药物,以支持JIA患者、家属、临床医生和护理团队之间有意义的对话和共同决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Co-design of an Electronic Dashboard to Support the Coproduction of Care in Pediatric Rheumatic Disease: Human-Centered Design and Usability Testing.

Co-design of an Electronic Dashboard to Support the Coproduction of Care in Pediatric Rheumatic Disease: Human-Centered Design and Usability Testing.

Co-design of an Electronic Dashboard to Support the Coproduction of Care in Pediatric Rheumatic Disease: Human-Centered Design and Usability Testing.

Co-design of an Electronic Dashboard to Support the Coproduction of Care in Pediatric Rheumatic Disease: Human-Centered Design and Usability Testing.

Background: The coproduction of care involves patients and families partnering with their clinicians and care teams, with the premise that each brings their own perspective, knowledge, and expertise, as well as their own values, goals, and preferences, to the partnership. Dashboards can display meaningful patient and clinical data to assess how a patient is doing and inform shared decision-making. Increasing communication between patients and care teams is particularly important for children with chronic conditions. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), the most common chronic pediatric rheumatic condition, is associated with increased pain, decreased function, and decreased quality of life.

Objective: The aim of this study is to design a dashboard prototype for use in coproducing care in patients with JIA. We evaluated the use and needs of end users, obtained a consensus on the necessary dashboard data elements, and constructed display prototypes to inform meaningful discussions for coproduction.

Methods: A human-centered design approach involving parents, patients, clinicians, and care team members was used to develop a dashboard to support the coproduction of care in 4 ambulatory pediatric rheumatology clinics. We engaged a multidisciplinary team (n=18) of patients, parents, clinicians, nurses, and staff during an in-person kick-off meeting followed by biweekly meetings. We also leveraged advisory panels. Teams mapped workflows and patient journeys, created personas, and developed dashboard sketches. The final dashboard components were determined via Delphi consensus voting. Low-tech dashboard testing was completed during clinic visits, and visual display prototypes were iterated by using the Plan-Do-Study-Act methodology. Patients and clinicians were surveyed regarding their experiences.

Results: Teams achieved consensus on what data mattered most at the point of care to support patients with JIA, families, and clinicians collaborating to make the best possible health care decisions. Notable themes included the right data in the right place at the right time, data in once for multiple purposes, patient and family self-management components, and the opportunity for education and increased transparency. A final set of 11 dashboard data elements was identified, including patient-reported outcomes, clinical data, and medications. Important design considerations featured the incorporation of real-time data, clearly labeled graphs, and vertical orientation to facilitate review and discussion. Prototype paper-testing with 36 patients and families yielded positive feedback, with 89% (8/9) to 100% (9/9) of parents (n=9) and 80% (8/10) to 90% (9/10) of clinicians (n=10) strongly agreeing or agreeing that the dashboard was useful during clinic discussions, helped to talk about what mattered most, and informed health care decision-making.

Conclusions: We developed a dashboard prototype that displays patient-reported and clinical data over time, along with medications that can be used during a clinic visit to support meaningful conversations and shared decision-making among patients with JIA, their families, and their clinicians and care teams.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Participatory Medicine
Journal of Participatory Medicine Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信