Taha Alhalimi, Jisok Lim, Drew Gourley, Hirofumi Tanaka
{"title":"将各种动脉刚度指标转换和标准化为脉搏波速度。","authors":"Taha Alhalimi, Jisok Lim, Drew Gourley, Hirofumi Tanaka","doi":"10.1159/000517872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A variety of arterial stiffness measures have been used to assess the impacts of disease states and various interventions without clear consensus among them. One of the primary problems faced by investigators conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses is the lack of standardized methodology with a same unit to evaluate and compare investigations using different arterial stiffness measures. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to derive and summarize standardized equations to convert commonly used image-based measures of arterial stiffness to local pulse wave velocity (PWV).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We first conducted a literature search to obtain and summarize conversion equations in the published literature such that these equations can be found in one convenient location. Then, we generated regression equations using the data collected in a well-controlled laboratory-based study, in which all measures of arterial stiffness were obtained in 49 apparently healthy participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All literature-based conversion equations produced similar local PWV values and were moderately and significantly correlated with directly measured carotid-femoral PWV (cfPWV) with a Pearson's <i>r</i> ranging from 0.41 to 0.50. The local PWV using laboratory-based equations were modestly associated with cfPWV (<i>r</i> = 0.39-0.49) with an exception of incremental elastic modulus (<i>r</i> = 0.15, <i>p</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Commonly used measures of ultrasound-based arterial stiffness can be converted to local PWV and compared with a reference standard measure of arterial stiffness.</p>","PeriodicalId":29774,"journal":{"name":"Pulse","volume":"9 3-4","pages":"72-82"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8740287/pdf/pls-0009-0072.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Converting and Standardizing Various Measures of Arterial Stiffness to Pulse Wave Velocity.\",\"authors\":\"Taha Alhalimi, Jisok Lim, Drew Gourley, Hirofumi Tanaka\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000517872\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A variety of arterial stiffness measures have been used to assess the impacts of disease states and various interventions without clear consensus among them. One of the primary problems faced by investigators conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses is the lack of standardized methodology with a same unit to evaluate and compare investigations using different arterial stiffness measures. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to derive and summarize standardized equations to convert commonly used image-based measures of arterial stiffness to local pulse wave velocity (PWV).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We first conducted a literature search to obtain and summarize conversion equations in the published literature such that these equations can be found in one convenient location. Then, we generated regression equations using the data collected in a well-controlled laboratory-based study, in which all measures of arterial stiffness were obtained in 49 apparently healthy participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All literature-based conversion equations produced similar local PWV values and were moderately and significantly correlated with directly measured carotid-femoral PWV (cfPWV) with a Pearson's <i>r</i> ranging from 0.41 to 0.50. The local PWV using laboratory-based equations were modestly associated with cfPWV (<i>r</i> = 0.39-0.49) with an exception of incremental elastic modulus (<i>r</i> = 0.15, <i>p</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Commonly used measures of ultrasound-based arterial stiffness can be converted to local PWV and compared with a reference standard measure of arterial stiffness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pulse\",\"volume\":\"9 3-4\",\"pages\":\"72-82\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8740287/pdf/pls-0009-0072.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pulse\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000517872\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000517872","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
背景:各种动脉硬度测量已被用于评估疾病状态和各种干预措施的影响,但它们之间没有明确的共识。研究者在进行系统评价和荟萃分析时面临的主要问题之一是缺乏统一的标准方法来评估和比较使用不同动脉硬度测量的调查。因此,本研究的目的是推导和总结标准化方程,将常用的基于图像的动脉刚度测量转换为局部脉搏波速度(PWV)。方法:我们首先进行文献检索,从已发表的文献中获取和总结转换方程,使这些方程可以在一个方便的位置找到。然后,我们使用在一项控制良好的实验室研究中收集的数据生成回归方程,其中49名明显健康的参与者获得了所有动脉僵硬度的测量值。结果:所有基于文献的转换方程产生相似的局部PWV值,并与直接测量的颈-股动脉PWV (cfPWV)中度显著相关,Pearson's r范围为0.41至0.50。除了增量弹性模量(r = 0.15, p > 0.05)外,基于实验室方程的局部PWV与cfPWV有适度关联(r = 0.39-0.49)。结论:常用的超声动脉硬度测量方法可转换为局部PWV,并与参考标准动脉硬度测量方法进行比较。
Converting and Standardizing Various Measures of Arterial Stiffness to Pulse Wave Velocity.
Background: A variety of arterial stiffness measures have been used to assess the impacts of disease states and various interventions without clear consensus among them. One of the primary problems faced by investigators conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses is the lack of standardized methodology with a same unit to evaluate and compare investigations using different arterial stiffness measures. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to derive and summarize standardized equations to convert commonly used image-based measures of arterial stiffness to local pulse wave velocity (PWV).
Methods: We first conducted a literature search to obtain and summarize conversion equations in the published literature such that these equations can be found in one convenient location. Then, we generated regression equations using the data collected in a well-controlled laboratory-based study, in which all measures of arterial stiffness were obtained in 49 apparently healthy participants.
Results: All literature-based conversion equations produced similar local PWV values and were moderately and significantly correlated with directly measured carotid-femoral PWV (cfPWV) with a Pearson's r ranging from 0.41 to 0.50. The local PWV using laboratory-based equations were modestly associated with cfPWV (r = 0.39-0.49) with an exception of incremental elastic modulus (r = 0.15, p > 0.05).
Conclusion: Commonly used measures of ultrasound-based arterial stiffness can be converted to local PWV and compared with a reference standard measure of arterial stiffness.