38种不同作用方式农药的物种敏感性分布生态效应评价。

IF 1.5 4区 农林科学 Q2 ENTOMOLOGY
Takashi Nagai
{"title":"38种不同作用方式农药的物种敏感性分布生态效应评价。","authors":"Takashi Nagai","doi":"10.1584/jpestics.D21-034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Species sensitivity distributions (SSDs) of 38 pesticides with various modes of action were analyzed as a higher-tier ecological effect assessment based on collected acute toxicity data. Then the 5% hazardous concentrations (HC<sub>5</sub>) based on each SSD were calculated as the predicted no-effect concentrations for aquatic ecosystems. The differences between HC<sub>5</sub> and registration criteria were small (within ten-fold) for 35 of the 38 pesticides. However, there were more than ten-fold differences for a fungicide and two herbicides. These results suggest that the current effect assessment scheme could underestimate the effect of such pesticides. This could be caused by differences in sensitivity of specific properties of the mode of action.</p>","PeriodicalId":16712,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pesticide Science","volume":"46 4","pages":"366-372"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/07/b3/jps-46-4-D21-034.PMC8640677.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ecological effect assessment by species sensitivity distribution for 38 pesticides with various modes of action.\",\"authors\":\"Takashi Nagai\",\"doi\":\"10.1584/jpestics.D21-034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Species sensitivity distributions (SSDs) of 38 pesticides with various modes of action were analyzed as a higher-tier ecological effect assessment based on collected acute toxicity data. Then the 5% hazardous concentrations (HC<sub>5</sub>) based on each SSD were calculated as the predicted no-effect concentrations for aquatic ecosystems. The differences between HC<sub>5</sub> and registration criteria were small (within ten-fold) for 35 of the 38 pesticides. However, there were more than ten-fold differences for a fungicide and two herbicides. These results suggest that the current effect assessment scheme could underestimate the effect of such pesticides. This could be caused by differences in sensitivity of specific properties of the mode of action.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16712,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pesticide Science\",\"volume\":\"46 4\",\"pages\":\"366-372\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/07/b3/jps-46-4-D21-034.PMC8640677.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pesticide Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1584/jpestics.D21-034\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENTOMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pesticide Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1584/jpestics.D21-034","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据收集到的急性毒性数据,对 38 种具有不同作用模式的农药的物种敏感性分布(SSD)进行了分析,作为更高层次的生态效应评估。然后,根据每个 SSD 计算出 5%的有害浓度(HC5),作为水生生态系统的预测无效应浓度。在 38 种农药中,有 35 种农药的 HC5 与登记标准之间的差异很小(在 10 倍以内)。然而,一种杀真菌剂和两种除草剂的 HC5 与登记标准之间的差异超过十倍。这些结果表明,目前的效果评估方案可能低估了这些农药的效果。这可能是由于作用模式的特定属性的敏感性不同造成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Ecological effect assessment by species sensitivity distribution for 38 pesticides with various modes of action.

Ecological effect assessment by species sensitivity distribution for 38 pesticides with various modes of action.

Ecological effect assessment by species sensitivity distribution for 38 pesticides with various modes of action.

Ecological effect assessment by species sensitivity distribution for 38 pesticides with various modes of action.

Species sensitivity distributions (SSDs) of 38 pesticides with various modes of action were analyzed as a higher-tier ecological effect assessment based on collected acute toxicity data. Then the 5% hazardous concentrations (HC5) based on each SSD were calculated as the predicted no-effect concentrations for aquatic ecosystems. The differences between HC5 and registration criteria were small (within ten-fold) for 35 of the 38 pesticides. However, there were more than ten-fold differences for a fungicide and two herbicides. These results suggest that the current effect assessment scheme could underestimate the effect of such pesticides. This could be caused by differences in sensitivity of specific properties of the mode of action.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pesticide Science
Journal of Pesticide Science 农林科学-昆虫学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.20%
发文量
28
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pesticide Science publishes the results of original research regarding the chemistry and biochemistry of pesticides including bio-based materials. It also covers their metabolism, toxicology, environmental fate and formulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信