在一个安静和温控的房间里,在炎热环境中生活和工作对认知功能的影响:一项石油和天然气行业的研究。

Q1 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Temperature Pub Date : 2021-09-14 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1080/23328940.2021.1959289
Olivier Girard, Nadia Gaoua, Justin Grantham, Wade Knez, Andrew Walsh, Sebastien Racinais
{"title":"在一个安静和温控的房间里,在炎热环境中生活和工作对认知功能的影响:一项石油和天然气行业的研究。","authors":"Olivier Girard,&nbsp;Nadia Gaoua,&nbsp;Justin Grantham,&nbsp;Wade Knez,&nbsp;Andrew Walsh,&nbsp;Sebastien Racinais","doi":"10.1080/23328940.2021.1959289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We investigate the effects of seasonal heat stress on cognitive function in outdoor workers. Thirty-nine workers from an oil and gas industry in the Middle-East volunteered for cognitive testing before (5.30 to 7.00 am) and after (3.30 to 5.00 pm) their daily work-shift in hot (August - average daily temperature: ~41°C) and temperate (January - average daily temperature: ~22°C) seasons. While physical activity was reduced in hot compared to temperate season (average normalized acceleration: 96 ± 33 <i>vs</i>. 112 ± 31 × 10<sup>-3</sup> g; -12.5 ± 4.7%; P = 0.010), the average core temperature during the work-shift was higher in the hot season (37.4 ± 0.2 <i>vs</i>. 37.2 ± 0.2°C; P = 0.002). Peak core temperature was 38.0 ± 0.1°C and 37.8 ± 0.1°C in hot and temperate seasons, respectively. Cognitive performance did not differ between seasons for tests of recognition memory (P = 0.169), working memory (P = 0.797) and executive function (P = 0.145), independent of testing time. Whereas there was no significant main effect of testing time for tests of recognition memory (P = 0.503) and working memory (P = 0.849), the number of problems solved on the first choice for the executive function test was lower in the afternoon than the morning (-9.2 ± 5.3%; P = 0.039). There was no season × testing time interaction for any cognitive tests (P ≥ 0.145). In the absence of hyperthermia, living and working in a hot environment does not alter cognitive function in oil and gas industry workers tested in a quiet and temperature-controlled room, with reduced clothing encumbrance (relative to work). Conclusions should not be extrapolated to more stressful situations (i.e., thermal stressor present, pronounced dehydration, noise).</p>","PeriodicalId":36837,"journal":{"name":"Temperature","volume":"8 4","pages":"372-380"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8654476/pdf/KTMP_8_1959289.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of living and working in a hot environment on cognitive function in a quiet and temperature-controlled room: An oil and gas industry study.\",\"authors\":\"Olivier Girard,&nbsp;Nadia Gaoua,&nbsp;Justin Grantham,&nbsp;Wade Knez,&nbsp;Andrew Walsh,&nbsp;Sebastien Racinais\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23328940.2021.1959289\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We investigate the effects of seasonal heat stress on cognitive function in outdoor workers. Thirty-nine workers from an oil and gas industry in the Middle-East volunteered for cognitive testing before (5.30 to 7.00 am) and after (3.30 to 5.00 pm) their daily work-shift in hot (August - average daily temperature: ~41°C) and temperate (January - average daily temperature: ~22°C) seasons. While physical activity was reduced in hot compared to temperate season (average normalized acceleration: 96 ± 33 <i>vs</i>. 112 ± 31 × 10<sup>-3</sup> g; -12.5 ± 4.7%; P = 0.010), the average core temperature during the work-shift was higher in the hot season (37.4 ± 0.2 <i>vs</i>. 37.2 ± 0.2°C; P = 0.002). Peak core temperature was 38.0 ± 0.1°C and 37.8 ± 0.1°C in hot and temperate seasons, respectively. Cognitive performance did not differ between seasons for tests of recognition memory (P = 0.169), working memory (P = 0.797) and executive function (P = 0.145), independent of testing time. Whereas there was no significant main effect of testing time for tests of recognition memory (P = 0.503) and working memory (P = 0.849), the number of problems solved on the first choice for the executive function test was lower in the afternoon than the morning (-9.2 ± 5.3%; P = 0.039). There was no season × testing time interaction for any cognitive tests (P ≥ 0.145). In the absence of hyperthermia, living and working in a hot environment does not alter cognitive function in oil and gas industry workers tested in a quiet and temperature-controlled room, with reduced clothing encumbrance (relative to work). Conclusions should not be extrapolated to more stressful situations (i.e., thermal stressor present, pronounced dehydration, noise).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Temperature\",\"volume\":\"8 4\",\"pages\":\"372-380\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8654476/pdf/KTMP_8_1959289.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Temperature\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23328940.2021.1959289\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Temperature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23328940.2021.1959289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

我们研究了季节性热应激对户外工作者认知功能的影响。来自中东石油和天然气行业的39名工人自愿在炎热季节(8月-日平均温度:~41°C)和温和季节(1月-日平均温度:~22°C)的日常工作之前(上午5:30至7:00)和之后(下午3:30至5:00)接受认知测试。与温带季节相比,炎热季节的体力活动减少(平均标准化加速度:96±33比112±31 × 10- 3g;-12.5±4.7%;P = 0.010),炎热季节轮班时的平均核心温度较高(37.4±0.2 vs. 37.2±0.2°C;P = 0.002)。高温季节和温带季节的峰值核心温度分别为38.0±0.1°C和37.8±0.1°C。识别记忆(P = 0.169)、工作记忆(P = 0.797)和执行功能(P = 0.145)的认知表现在不同季节之间没有差异,与测试时间无关。识别记忆测验(P = 0.503)和工作记忆测验(P = 0.849)的测验时间不存在显著的主效应,但执行功能测验的第一选择题的解题数在下午低于上午(-9.2±5.3%;P = 0.039)。所有认知测试均无季节与测试时间交互作用(P≥0.145)。在没有热疗的情况下,在一个安静和温度控制的房间里生活和工作的石油和天然气行业工人的认知功能不会改变,衣服的负担减少了(相对于工作)。结论不应外推到更紧张的情况下(即,热应激源存在,明显脱水,噪音)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effects of living and working in a hot environment on cognitive function in a quiet and temperature-controlled room: An oil and gas industry study.

Effects of living and working in a hot environment on cognitive function in a quiet and temperature-controlled room: An oil and gas industry study.

Effects of living and working in a hot environment on cognitive function in a quiet and temperature-controlled room: An oil and gas industry study.

We investigate the effects of seasonal heat stress on cognitive function in outdoor workers. Thirty-nine workers from an oil and gas industry in the Middle-East volunteered for cognitive testing before (5.30 to 7.00 am) and after (3.30 to 5.00 pm) their daily work-shift in hot (August - average daily temperature: ~41°C) and temperate (January - average daily temperature: ~22°C) seasons. While physical activity was reduced in hot compared to temperate season (average normalized acceleration: 96 ± 33 vs. 112 ± 31 × 10-3 g; -12.5 ± 4.7%; P = 0.010), the average core temperature during the work-shift was higher in the hot season (37.4 ± 0.2 vs. 37.2 ± 0.2°C; P = 0.002). Peak core temperature was 38.0 ± 0.1°C and 37.8 ± 0.1°C in hot and temperate seasons, respectively. Cognitive performance did not differ between seasons for tests of recognition memory (P = 0.169), working memory (P = 0.797) and executive function (P = 0.145), independent of testing time. Whereas there was no significant main effect of testing time for tests of recognition memory (P = 0.503) and working memory (P = 0.849), the number of problems solved on the first choice for the executive function test was lower in the afternoon than the morning (-9.2 ± 5.3%; P = 0.039). There was no season × testing time interaction for any cognitive tests (P ≥ 0.145). In the absence of hyperthermia, living and working in a hot environment does not alter cognitive function in oil and gas industry workers tested in a quiet and temperature-controlled room, with reduced clothing encumbrance (relative to work). Conclusions should not be extrapolated to more stressful situations (i.e., thermal stressor present, pronounced dehydration, noise).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Temperature
Temperature Medicine-Physiology (medical)
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信