部分测量不变性:扩展和评价聚类方法识别锚项目。

IF 1 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL
Applied Psychological Measurement Pub Date : 2021-10-01 Epub Date: 2021-10-19 DOI:10.1177/01466216211042809
Steffi Pohl, Daniel Schulze, Eric Stets
{"title":"部分测量不变性:扩展和评价聚类方法识别锚项目。","authors":"Steffi Pohl,&nbsp;Daniel Schulze,&nbsp;Eric Stets","doi":"10.1177/01466216211042809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When measurement invariance does not hold, researchers aim for partial measurement invariance by identifying anchor items that are assumed to be measurement invariant. In this paper, we build on Bechger and Maris's approach for identification of anchor items. Instead of identifying differential item functioning (DIF)-free items, they propose to identify different sets of items that are invariant in item parameters within the same item set. We extend their approach by an additional step in order to allow for identification of homogeneously functioning item sets. We evaluate the performance of the extended cluster approach under various conditions and compare its performance to that of previous approaches, that are the equal-mean difficulty (EMD) approach and the iterative forward approach. We show that the EMD and the iterative forward approaches perform well in conditions with balanced DIF or when DIF is small. In conditions with large and unbalanced DIF, they fail to recover the true group mean differences. With appropriate threshold settings, the cluster approach identified a cluster that resulted in unbiased mean difference estimates in all conditions. Compared to previous approaches, the cluster approach allows for a variety of different assumptions as well as for depicting the uncertainty in the results that stem from the choice of the assumption. Using a real data set, we illustrate how the assumptions of the previous approaches may be incorporated in the cluster approach and how the chosen assumption impacts the results.</p>","PeriodicalId":48300,"journal":{"name":"Applied Psychological Measurement","volume":"45 7-8","pages":"477-493"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c9/d1/10.1177_01466216211042809.PMC8640350.pdf","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Partial Measurement Invariance: Extending and Evaluating the Cluster Approach for Identifying Anchor Items.\",\"authors\":\"Steffi Pohl,&nbsp;Daniel Schulze,&nbsp;Eric Stets\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01466216211042809\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>When measurement invariance does not hold, researchers aim for partial measurement invariance by identifying anchor items that are assumed to be measurement invariant. In this paper, we build on Bechger and Maris's approach for identification of anchor items. Instead of identifying differential item functioning (DIF)-free items, they propose to identify different sets of items that are invariant in item parameters within the same item set. We extend their approach by an additional step in order to allow for identification of homogeneously functioning item sets. We evaluate the performance of the extended cluster approach under various conditions and compare its performance to that of previous approaches, that are the equal-mean difficulty (EMD) approach and the iterative forward approach. We show that the EMD and the iterative forward approaches perform well in conditions with balanced DIF or when DIF is small. In conditions with large and unbalanced DIF, they fail to recover the true group mean differences. With appropriate threshold settings, the cluster approach identified a cluster that resulted in unbiased mean difference estimates in all conditions. Compared to previous approaches, the cluster approach allows for a variety of different assumptions as well as for depicting the uncertainty in the results that stem from the choice of the assumption. Using a real data set, we illustrate how the assumptions of the previous approaches may be incorporated in the cluster approach and how the chosen assumption impacts the results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Psychological Measurement\",\"volume\":\"45 7-8\",\"pages\":\"477-493\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c9/d1/10.1177_01466216211042809.PMC8640350.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Psychological Measurement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01466216211042809\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/10/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Psychological Measurement","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01466216211042809","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

当测量不变性不成立时,研究人员通过识别假定为测量不变性的锚点项目来实现部分测量不变性。在本文中,我们建立在Bechger和Maris的方法来识别锚项目。与其识别无差异项目功能(DIF)的项目,他们建议识别同一项目集中项目参数不变的不同项目集。我们通过一个额外的步骤扩展了他们的方法,以便允许识别同质功能的项目集。我们评估了扩展聚类方法在各种条件下的性能,并将其与之前的方法,即等平均难度(EMD)方法和迭代前向方法的性能进行了比较。我们证明了EMD和迭代正演方法在DIF平衡或DIF较小的情况下表现良好。在DIF较大且不平衡的情况下,它们无法恢复真实的群均值差异。通过适当的阈值设置,聚类方法确定了在所有条件下产生无偏平均差估计的聚类。与以前的方法相比,聚类方法允许各种不同的假设,以及描述源于假设选择的结果中的不确定性。使用真实数据集,我们说明了如何将前面方法的假设纳入聚类方法,以及所选择的假设如何影响结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Partial Measurement Invariance: Extending and Evaluating the Cluster Approach for Identifying Anchor Items.

Partial Measurement Invariance: Extending and Evaluating the Cluster Approach for Identifying Anchor Items.

Partial Measurement Invariance: Extending and Evaluating the Cluster Approach for Identifying Anchor Items.

Partial Measurement Invariance: Extending and Evaluating the Cluster Approach for Identifying Anchor Items.

When measurement invariance does not hold, researchers aim for partial measurement invariance by identifying anchor items that are assumed to be measurement invariant. In this paper, we build on Bechger and Maris's approach for identification of anchor items. Instead of identifying differential item functioning (DIF)-free items, they propose to identify different sets of items that are invariant in item parameters within the same item set. We extend their approach by an additional step in order to allow for identification of homogeneously functioning item sets. We evaluate the performance of the extended cluster approach under various conditions and compare its performance to that of previous approaches, that are the equal-mean difficulty (EMD) approach and the iterative forward approach. We show that the EMD and the iterative forward approaches perform well in conditions with balanced DIF or when DIF is small. In conditions with large and unbalanced DIF, they fail to recover the true group mean differences. With appropriate threshold settings, the cluster approach identified a cluster that resulted in unbiased mean difference estimates in all conditions. Compared to previous approaches, the cluster approach allows for a variety of different assumptions as well as for depicting the uncertainty in the results that stem from the choice of the assumption. Using a real data set, we illustrate how the assumptions of the previous approaches may be incorporated in the cluster approach and how the chosen assumption impacts the results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Applied Psychological Measurement publishes empirical research on the application of techniques of psychological measurement to substantive problems in all areas of psychology and related disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信