Christy I Lee, Minju D Yi, Brandon M Gage, Lisa N Yarbrough, Brian J Kirkwood, Wen Lien
{"title":"牙体填充树脂基复合材料的固化后聚合和固化深度行为。","authors":"Christy I Lee, Minju D Yi, Brandon M Gage, Lisa N Yarbrough, Brian J Kirkwood, Wen Lien","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Polymerization for modern dental resin-based composites (RBCs) not only occurs immediately upon light exposure but also continues for another 24 hours, well beyond after light is terminated. However, many questions still remain about the role of polymerization kinetics in optimizing the physical properties of a new RBC type-the bulk-fill.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim is to study the post-cure polymerization kinetics of bulk-fill RBCs and to compare their degree of polymeric conversion (DC) and depth-of-cure (DoC) with an incremental-fill, conventional RBC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five representative bulk-fill RBCs [Surefil SDR+Stress Decreasing Resin Flow Plus (SDRFP), Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill (TECB), Filtek 1 Bulk Fill (F1B), Venus Bulk Fill (VB), and Sonicfill (SF3)] and one conventional RBC [Filtek Supreme Ultra (FSU)] were investigated. The upper surface per RBC specimen was exposed to a light curing unit (Paradigm, 3M-ESPE, irradiance=1221 ± 5 mW/cm2) for 20 seconds. The DC per RBC brand were measured at the bottom surface (specimen Ø=4 mm, thickness=3 mm and 5 mm) as a function of post-curing times using a Fourier transform infrared attenuated total reflection spectrometer. Real-time data recording for post-cure DC began immediately upon light exposure and continued at steady intervals, up to15 min, then again after 24 hours. The DoC of all six RBC brands (n=6 / group) were measured according to ISO-4049. Data were analyzed with nonlinear regression and analysis of variances (ANOVA)/Tukey (α=0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean DC for the six RBCs with 5 mm curing height after 24 hours were: TECB=79.5%, VB=75.7%, SDRFP=69.2%, SF3=65.8%, F1B=51.8%, and FSU=44.0%. Bulk-fill RBCs showed higher DC efficiency than the conventional RBC for both the 3 mm and 5 mm curing heights. Significant differences in DoC were found amongst the six RBC brands: VB=5.1 mm, SDRFP=4.6 mm, F1B=3.8 mm, TECB=3.5 mm, FSU=3.0 mm, and SF3=2.7 mm.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DCs were more affected by specimen thickness, through which the curing light was attenuated, than RBC types. Clinician should be aware not all bulk-fill RBCs have a DoC greater than or equal to 4 mm. Also, a bulk-fill RBC that has a high DC after a post-cure time of 24 hours may not have a high DoC, which is typically measured relatively soon after light exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":74148,"journal":{"name":"Medical journal (Fort Sam Houston, Tex.)","volume":" PB 8-21-10/11/12","pages":"74-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Post-Cure Polymerization and Depth-of-Cure Behaviors of Dental Bulk-Fill Resin-Based Composites.\",\"authors\":\"Christy I Lee, Minju D Yi, Brandon M Gage, Lisa N Yarbrough, Brian J Kirkwood, Wen Lien\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Polymerization for modern dental resin-based composites (RBCs) not only occurs immediately upon light exposure but also continues for another 24 hours, well beyond after light is terminated. However, many questions still remain about the role of polymerization kinetics in optimizing the physical properties of a new RBC type-the bulk-fill.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim is to study the post-cure polymerization kinetics of bulk-fill RBCs and to compare their degree of polymeric conversion (DC) and depth-of-cure (DoC) with an incremental-fill, conventional RBC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five representative bulk-fill RBCs [Surefil SDR+Stress Decreasing Resin Flow Plus (SDRFP), Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill (TECB), Filtek 1 Bulk Fill (F1B), Venus Bulk Fill (VB), and Sonicfill (SF3)] and one conventional RBC [Filtek Supreme Ultra (FSU)] were investigated. The upper surface per RBC specimen was exposed to a light curing unit (Paradigm, 3M-ESPE, irradiance=1221 ± 5 mW/cm2) for 20 seconds. The DC per RBC brand were measured at the bottom surface (specimen Ø=4 mm, thickness=3 mm and 5 mm) as a function of post-curing times using a Fourier transform infrared attenuated total reflection spectrometer. Real-time data recording for post-cure DC began immediately upon light exposure and continued at steady intervals, up to15 min, then again after 24 hours. The DoC of all six RBC brands (n=6 / group) were measured according to ISO-4049. Data were analyzed with nonlinear regression and analysis of variances (ANOVA)/Tukey (α=0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean DC for the six RBCs with 5 mm curing height after 24 hours were: TECB=79.5%, VB=75.7%, SDRFP=69.2%, SF3=65.8%, F1B=51.8%, and FSU=44.0%. Bulk-fill RBCs showed higher DC efficiency than the conventional RBC for both the 3 mm and 5 mm curing heights. Significant differences in DoC were found amongst the six RBC brands: VB=5.1 mm, SDRFP=4.6 mm, F1B=3.8 mm, TECB=3.5 mm, FSU=3.0 mm, and SF3=2.7 mm.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DCs were more affected by specimen thickness, through which the curing light was attenuated, than RBC types. Clinician should be aware not all bulk-fill RBCs have a DoC greater than or equal to 4 mm. Also, a bulk-fill RBC that has a high DC after a post-cure time of 24 hours may not have a high DoC, which is typically measured relatively soon after light exposure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74148,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical journal (Fort Sam Houston, Tex.)\",\"volume\":\" PB 8-21-10/11/12\",\"pages\":\"74-82\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical journal (Fort Sam Houston, Tex.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical journal (Fort Sam Houston, Tex.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
现代牙科树脂基复合材料(rbc)的聚合不仅在光照下立即发生,而且在光照终止后还会持续24小时。然而,关于聚合动力学在优化一种新型红细胞-填充体的物理性能中的作用,仍然存在许多问题。目的:研究体积填充型红细胞的固化后聚合动力学,并比较其与增量填充型常规红细胞的聚合转化率(DC)和固化深度(DoC)。方法:研究了5种典型的填充型红细胞[Surefil SDR+Stress - reduction Resin Flow Plus (SDRFP), Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill (TECB), Filtek 1 Bulk Fill (F1B), Venus Bulk Fill (VB)和Sonicfill (SF3)]和1种常规RBC [Filtek Supreme Ultra (FSU)]。每个RBC标本的上表面暴露在光固化装置(Paradigm, 3M-ESPE,辐照度=1221±5 mW/cm2)下20秒。使用傅里叶变换红外衰减全反射光谱仪测量每个RBC品牌的底面DC(样品Ø=4 mm,厚度=3 mm和5 mm)作为固化后时间的函数。固化后DC的实时数据记录在光照后立即开始,并以稳定的间隔持续记录,最长可达15分钟,然后在24小时后再次记录。6个RBC品牌(n=6 /组)的DoC均按ISO-4049标准测定。数据分析采用非线性回归和方差分析(ANOVA)/Tukey (α=0.05)。结果:固化高度为5mm的6种红细胞24h后DC均值为:TECB=79.5%, VB=75.7%, SDRFP=69.2%, SF3=65.8%, F1B=51.8%, FSU=44.0%。在3mm和5mm固化高度下,填充型红细胞的直流效率均高于常规红细胞。6种红细胞类型(VB=5.1 mm, SDRFP=4.6 mm, F1B=3.8 mm, TECB=3.5 mm, FSU=3.0 mm, SF3=2.7 mm)的DoC差异有统计学意义。结论:dc受标本厚度的影响更大,通过标本厚度使固化光减弱。临床医生应注意,并非所有填充型红细胞的DoC都大于或等于4mm。此外,在固化后24小时具有高DC的散装填充RBC可能没有高DoC,这通常是在光照后相对较短的时间内测量的。
Post-Cure Polymerization and Depth-of-Cure Behaviors of Dental Bulk-Fill Resin-Based Composites.
Introduction: Polymerization for modern dental resin-based composites (RBCs) not only occurs immediately upon light exposure but also continues for another 24 hours, well beyond after light is terminated. However, many questions still remain about the role of polymerization kinetics in optimizing the physical properties of a new RBC type-the bulk-fill.
Objective: The aim is to study the post-cure polymerization kinetics of bulk-fill RBCs and to compare their degree of polymeric conversion (DC) and depth-of-cure (DoC) with an incremental-fill, conventional RBC.
Methods: Five representative bulk-fill RBCs [Surefil SDR+Stress Decreasing Resin Flow Plus (SDRFP), Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill (TECB), Filtek 1 Bulk Fill (F1B), Venus Bulk Fill (VB), and Sonicfill (SF3)] and one conventional RBC [Filtek Supreme Ultra (FSU)] were investigated. The upper surface per RBC specimen was exposed to a light curing unit (Paradigm, 3M-ESPE, irradiance=1221 ± 5 mW/cm2) for 20 seconds. The DC per RBC brand were measured at the bottom surface (specimen Ø=4 mm, thickness=3 mm and 5 mm) as a function of post-curing times using a Fourier transform infrared attenuated total reflection spectrometer. Real-time data recording for post-cure DC began immediately upon light exposure and continued at steady intervals, up to15 min, then again after 24 hours. The DoC of all six RBC brands (n=6 / group) were measured according to ISO-4049. Data were analyzed with nonlinear regression and analysis of variances (ANOVA)/Tukey (α=0.05).
Results: Mean DC for the six RBCs with 5 mm curing height after 24 hours were: TECB=79.5%, VB=75.7%, SDRFP=69.2%, SF3=65.8%, F1B=51.8%, and FSU=44.0%. Bulk-fill RBCs showed higher DC efficiency than the conventional RBC for both the 3 mm and 5 mm curing heights. Significant differences in DoC were found amongst the six RBC brands: VB=5.1 mm, SDRFP=4.6 mm, F1B=3.8 mm, TECB=3.5 mm, FSU=3.0 mm, and SF3=2.7 mm.
Conclusion: DCs were more affected by specimen thickness, through which the curing light was attenuated, than RBC types. Clinician should be aware not all bulk-fill RBCs have a DoC greater than or equal to 4 mm. Also, a bulk-fill RBC that has a high DC after a post-cure time of 24 hours may not have a high DoC, which is typically measured relatively soon after light exposure.