美国胃肠病学家对慢性肠衰竭的了解:值得关注的原因和学习机会。

IF 4.1
JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition Pub Date : 2022-03-01 Epub Date: 2021-11-18 DOI:10.1002/jpen.2283
Kishore R Iyer, Marion Winkler, Nicole Zubizarreta, Marjorie Nisenholtz, Katie Lucero, Jovana Lubarda
{"title":"美国胃肠病学家对慢性肠衰竭的了解:值得关注的原因和学习机会。","authors":"Kishore R Iyer,&nbsp;Marion Winkler,&nbsp;Nicole Zubizarreta,&nbsp;Marjorie Nisenholtz,&nbsp;Katie Lucero,&nbsp;Jovana Lubarda","doi":"10.1002/jpen.2283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic intestinal failure (CIF) is an ultrarare disease, with an estimated national prevalence of ∼25,000 cases. There is a suspicion of widespread lack of expertise in CIF care, but no formal assessment tool or data exist. We developed and validated a knowledge test in CIF and now report our preliminary results from testing CIF knowledge in a cohort of US gastroenterologists.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We developed a 20-question knowledge test in CIF, covering four key components of IF. After internal testing, refinement, and revision, we administered the test to a convenience sample of experts and nonexperts in IF. We then deployed the validated test to a cohort of 100 US gastroenterologists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The test had a Cronbach alpha of 0.74, suggesting a reliable test, with a threshold score to discriminate experts and nonexperts of 13.4 (maximum 20) and with a sensitivity of 81.3% and specificity of 86.4%. The overall mean score of 8.2 for the 100 US gastroenterologists was at the level of nonexperts in our convenience sample.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The preliminary results of our validated knowledge test in IF among a broad group of US gastroenterologists demonstrate lack of knowledge in IF.</p>","PeriodicalId":520701,"journal":{"name":"JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition","volume":" ","pages":"730-733"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge of chronic intestinal failure among US gastroenterologists: Cause for concern and learning opportunity.\",\"authors\":\"Kishore R Iyer,&nbsp;Marion Winkler,&nbsp;Nicole Zubizarreta,&nbsp;Marjorie Nisenholtz,&nbsp;Katie Lucero,&nbsp;Jovana Lubarda\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jpen.2283\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic intestinal failure (CIF) is an ultrarare disease, with an estimated national prevalence of ∼25,000 cases. There is a suspicion of widespread lack of expertise in CIF care, but no formal assessment tool or data exist. We developed and validated a knowledge test in CIF and now report our preliminary results from testing CIF knowledge in a cohort of US gastroenterologists.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We developed a 20-question knowledge test in CIF, covering four key components of IF. After internal testing, refinement, and revision, we administered the test to a convenience sample of experts and nonexperts in IF. We then deployed the validated test to a cohort of 100 US gastroenterologists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The test had a Cronbach alpha of 0.74, suggesting a reliable test, with a threshold score to discriminate experts and nonexperts of 13.4 (maximum 20) and with a sensitivity of 81.3% and specificity of 86.4%. The overall mean score of 8.2 for the 100 US gastroenterologists was at the level of nonexperts in our convenience sample.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The preliminary results of our validated knowledge test in IF among a broad group of US gastroenterologists demonstrate lack of knowledge in IF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520701,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"730-733\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jpen.2283\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/11/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jpen.2283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:慢性肠衰竭(CIF)是一种罕见的疾病,估计全国患病率为2.5万例。人们怀疑在CIF护理方面普遍缺乏专业知识,但没有正式的评估工具或数据存在。我们开发并验证了CIF知识测试,现在报告我们在美国胃肠病学家队列中测试CIF知识的初步结果。方法:我们在CIF中开发了一个20题的知识测试,涵盖了IF的四个关键组成部分。经过内部测试、改进和修订,我们对IF专家和非专家的方便样本进行了测试。然后,我们对100名美国胃肠病学家进行了验证测试。结果:该测试的Cronbach alpha为0.74,表明该测试是可靠的,区分专家和非专家的阈值得分为13.4(最大20分),敏感性为81.3%,特异性为86.4%。在我们的便利样本中,100名美国胃肠病学家的总体平均得分为8.2,与非专家的水平相当。结论:我们在广泛的美国胃肠病学家群体中验证的IF知识测试的初步结果表明,他们缺乏IF知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Knowledge of chronic intestinal failure among US gastroenterologists: Cause for concern and learning opportunity.

Background: Chronic intestinal failure (CIF) is an ultrarare disease, with an estimated national prevalence of ∼25,000 cases. There is a suspicion of widespread lack of expertise in CIF care, but no formal assessment tool or data exist. We developed and validated a knowledge test in CIF and now report our preliminary results from testing CIF knowledge in a cohort of US gastroenterologists.

Method: We developed a 20-question knowledge test in CIF, covering four key components of IF. After internal testing, refinement, and revision, we administered the test to a convenience sample of experts and nonexperts in IF. We then deployed the validated test to a cohort of 100 US gastroenterologists.

Results: The test had a Cronbach alpha of 0.74, suggesting a reliable test, with a threshold score to discriminate experts and nonexperts of 13.4 (maximum 20) and with a sensitivity of 81.3% and specificity of 86.4%. The overall mean score of 8.2 for the 100 US gastroenterologists was at the level of nonexperts in our convenience sample.

Conclusion: The preliminary results of our validated knowledge test in IF among a broad group of US gastroenterologists demonstrate lack of knowledge in IF.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信