在仅非洲裔美国人的队列中,从MDRD方程中去掉种族对估计GFR的意义。

IF 1.7 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
International Journal of Nephrology Pub Date : 2021-11-16 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2021/1880499
Ernie Yap, Yelyzaveta Prysyazhnyuk, Jie Ouyang, Isha Puri, Carla Boutin-Foster, Moro Salifu
{"title":"在仅非洲裔美国人的队列中,从MDRD方程中去掉种族对估计GFR的意义。","authors":"Ernie Yap,&nbsp;Yelyzaveta Prysyazhnyuk,&nbsp;Jie Ouyang,&nbsp;Isha Puri,&nbsp;Carla Boutin-Foster,&nbsp;Moro Salifu","doi":"10.1155/2021/1880499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The widely used Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula adapts a 1.212 multiplier for individuals who are identified as African Americans (AAs) or Blacks, which leads to a higher GFR estimation. As it stands, AAs have a lower prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) but higher incidence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) compared with Whites. Many hypotheses have been postulated to explain this paradox, but the imprecision of the GFR estimation with race-adaptation could be contributory. We performed a single-center, longitudinal, retrospective study on a cohort of outpatient AA patients using the MDRD and MDRD<sub>race removed</sub> and CKD-EPI and CKD-EPI<sub>race removed</sub> and their progression to CKD G5 (eGFR <15 ml/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>). 327 patients were analyzed. Median follow-up was 88.1 months (interquartile range, 34.4-129.1). When race was removed from MDRD, 39.9% of patients in CKD G1/2 were reclassified to CKD G3a, 72.6% of patients in CKD G3a would be reclassified to CKD G3b, and 54.1% and 36.4% of patients would be reclassified from CKD 3b to CKD G4 and CKD G4 to CKD G5, respectively (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). Comparing the CKD-EPI formula against the MDRD in our cohort, we found that 8.2%, 18.8%, and 11.4% of patients were reclassified from CKD G1/2 to CKD G3a, CKD G3a to G3b, and CKD G3b to CKD G4 respectively. Overall median time to progression to CKD G5 was 137.4 (131.9-142.8) months in patients who were not reclassified and 133.6 (127.6-139.6) months for patients who were reclassified by MDRD<sub>race removed</sub>(<i>p</i> < 0.288). Concerns of inequitable access to healthcare have elicited calls to review race-corrected eGFR equations. A substantial number of individuals would have their CKD stage reclassified should have the MDRD<sub>race removed</sub> equation be adopted <i>en masse</i> on an AA-only population. The discrepancy is highest at the 45-59 and >60 ml/min/1.72 min<sup>2</sup> ranges. This will have tremendous impact on our center's approach to pharmacological dosing, referral system, best practices, and outcome surveillance. Comprehensive review of the current \"race-corrected\" eGFR will require a multifaceted approach and adjunctive use of noncreatinine-based approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":14177,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nephrology","volume":"2021 ","pages":"1880499"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8610663/pdf/","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Implication of Dropping Race from the MDRD Equation to Estimate GFR in an African American-Only Cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Ernie Yap,&nbsp;Yelyzaveta Prysyazhnyuk,&nbsp;Jie Ouyang,&nbsp;Isha Puri,&nbsp;Carla Boutin-Foster,&nbsp;Moro Salifu\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2021/1880499\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The widely used Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula adapts a 1.212 multiplier for individuals who are identified as African Americans (AAs) or Blacks, which leads to a higher GFR estimation. As it stands, AAs have a lower prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) but higher incidence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) compared with Whites. Many hypotheses have been postulated to explain this paradox, but the imprecision of the GFR estimation with race-adaptation could be contributory. We performed a single-center, longitudinal, retrospective study on a cohort of outpatient AA patients using the MDRD and MDRD<sub>race removed</sub> and CKD-EPI and CKD-EPI<sub>race removed</sub> and their progression to CKD G5 (eGFR <15 ml/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>). 327 patients were analyzed. Median follow-up was 88.1 months (interquartile range, 34.4-129.1). When race was removed from MDRD, 39.9% of patients in CKD G1/2 were reclassified to CKD G3a, 72.6% of patients in CKD G3a would be reclassified to CKD G3b, and 54.1% and 36.4% of patients would be reclassified from CKD 3b to CKD G4 and CKD G4 to CKD G5, respectively (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). Comparing the CKD-EPI formula against the MDRD in our cohort, we found that 8.2%, 18.8%, and 11.4% of patients were reclassified from CKD G1/2 to CKD G3a, CKD G3a to G3b, and CKD G3b to CKD G4 respectively. Overall median time to progression to CKD G5 was 137.4 (131.9-142.8) months in patients who were not reclassified and 133.6 (127.6-139.6) months for patients who were reclassified by MDRD<sub>race removed</sub>(<i>p</i> < 0.288). Concerns of inequitable access to healthcare have elicited calls to review race-corrected eGFR equations. A substantial number of individuals would have their CKD stage reclassified should have the MDRD<sub>race removed</sub> equation be adopted <i>en masse</i> on an AA-only population. The discrepancy is highest at the 45-59 and >60 ml/min/1.72 min<sup>2</sup> ranges. This will have tremendous impact on our center's approach to pharmacological dosing, referral system, best practices, and outcome surveillance. Comprehensive review of the current \\\"race-corrected\\\" eGFR will require a multifaceted approach and adjunctive use of noncreatinine-based approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14177,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Nephrology\",\"volume\":\"2021 \",\"pages\":\"1880499\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8610663/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/1880499\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/1880499","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

广泛使用的肾脏疾病饮食调整(MDRD)公式适用于被认定为非洲裔美国人(AAs)或黑人的个体的1.212乘数,这导致更高的GFR估计。就目前而言,与白人相比,AAs的慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)患病率较低,但终末期肾脏疾病(ESRD)的发病率较高。人们提出了许多假设来解释这一悖论,但种族适应对GFR估计的不精确可能是原因之一。我们进行了一项单中心、纵向、回顾性研究,对一组门诊AA患者进行了MDRD和MDRDrace切除,CKD- epi和CKD- epirace切除,并分析了他们进展为CKD G5 (eGFR 2)的情况。中位随访时间为88.1个月(四分位数间距为34.4-129.1)。当种族从MDRD中剔除后,39.9%的CKD G1/2重分类为CKD G3a, 72.6%的CKD G3a重分类为CKD G3b, 54.1%和36.4%的CKD 3b重分类为CKD G4和CKD G4重分类为CKD G5,差异均有统计学意义(p < 0.0001)。将我们队列中的CKD- epi公式与MDRD进行比较,我们发现分别有8.2%、18.8%和11.4%的患者从CKD G1/2重新分类为CKD G3a、CKD G3a重新分类为G3b和CKD G3b重新分类为CKD G4。未重新分类的患者进展为CKD G5的总体中位时间为137.4(131.9-142.8)个月,而通过移除MDRDrace重新分类的患者进展为133.6(127.6-139.6)个月(p < 0.288)。对获得医疗保健机会不公平的担忧促使人们呼吁审查种族校正的eGFR方程。如果在仅aa的人群中采用MDRDrace去除方程,则大量个体的CKD阶段将被重新分类。在45-59和>60 ml/min/1.72 min2范围内差异最大。这将对我们中心的药物剂量、转诊系统、最佳实践和结果监测方法产生巨大影响。对当前“种族校正”eGFR的综合评价需要采用多方面的方法和辅助使用非肌酐为基础的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Implication of Dropping Race from the MDRD Equation to Estimate GFR in an African American-Only Cohort.

The Implication of Dropping Race from the MDRD Equation to Estimate GFR in an African American-Only Cohort.

The Implication of Dropping Race from the MDRD Equation to Estimate GFR in an African American-Only Cohort.

The widely used Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula adapts a 1.212 multiplier for individuals who are identified as African Americans (AAs) or Blacks, which leads to a higher GFR estimation. As it stands, AAs have a lower prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) but higher incidence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) compared with Whites. Many hypotheses have been postulated to explain this paradox, but the imprecision of the GFR estimation with race-adaptation could be contributory. We performed a single-center, longitudinal, retrospective study on a cohort of outpatient AA patients using the MDRD and MDRDrace removed and CKD-EPI and CKD-EPIrace removed and their progression to CKD G5 (eGFR <15 ml/min/1.73 m2). 327 patients were analyzed. Median follow-up was 88.1 months (interquartile range, 34.4-129.1). When race was removed from MDRD, 39.9% of patients in CKD G1/2 were reclassified to CKD G3a, 72.6% of patients in CKD G3a would be reclassified to CKD G3b, and 54.1% and 36.4% of patients would be reclassified from CKD 3b to CKD G4 and CKD G4 to CKD G5, respectively (p < 0.0001). Comparing the CKD-EPI formula against the MDRD in our cohort, we found that 8.2%, 18.8%, and 11.4% of patients were reclassified from CKD G1/2 to CKD G3a, CKD G3a to G3b, and CKD G3b to CKD G4 respectively. Overall median time to progression to CKD G5 was 137.4 (131.9-142.8) months in patients who were not reclassified and 133.6 (127.6-139.6) months for patients who were reclassified by MDRDrace removed(p < 0.288). Concerns of inequitable access to healthcare have elicited calls to review race-corrected eGFR equations. A substantial number of individuals would have their CKD stage reclassified should have the MDRDrace removed equation be adopted en masse on an AA-only population. The discrepancy is highest at the 45-59 and >60 ml/min/1.72 min2 ranges. This will have tremendous impact on our center's approach to pharmacological dosing, referral system, best practices, and outcome surveillance. Comprehensive review of the current "race-corrected" eGFR will require a multifaceted approach and adjunctive use of noncreatinine-based approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Nephrology
International Journal of Nephrology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
44
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Nephrology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies focusing on the prevention, diagnosis, and management of kidney diseases and associated disorders. The journal welcomes submissions related to cell biology, developmental biology, genetics, immunology, pathology, pathophysiology of renal disease and progression, clinical nephrology, dialysis, and transplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信