儿童肿瘤学筛查干预的试点随机社会心理试验。

Psycho-Oncology Pub Date : 2022-05-01 Epub Date: 2021-11-23 DOI:10.1002/pon.5857
Maru Barrera, Leandra Desjardins, Soni Prasad, Wendy Shama, Sarah Alexander, Peter Szatmari, Kelly Hancock
{"title":"儿童肿瘤学筛查干预的试点随机社会心理试验。","authors":"Maru Barrera,&nbsp;Leandra Desjardins,&nbsp;Soni Prasad,&nbsp;Wendy Shama,&nbsp;Sarah Alexander,&nbsp;Peter Szatmari,&nbsp;Kelly Hancock","doi":"10.1002/pon.5857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Psychosocial screening is a standard of care in pediatric oncology, but there is limited information about how to intervene after screening. This pilot trial aimed to determine feasibility of the novel Enhanced Psychosocial Screening Intervention (EPSI) and explore its preliminary efficacy outcomes. We examined rates of recruitment, retention, intervention acceptability, and monthly distress screening completion, as well as exploratory efficacy outcomes (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System: depression, anxiety and fatigue; distress thermometer, pain and sleep).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Parallel-group randomized pilot trial: Caregiver-youth (10-17 years at enrollment, newly diagnosed with cancer) dyads were randomly allocated to either EPSI or standard care with 1:1 ratio allocation. EPSI consists of having a Psychosocial Navigator who shares screening results conducted near diagnosis and monthly for one year with treating teams and families, and provides recommendations tailored to screening results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Enrollment rate was 54% (38 dyads); retention was 90% and acceptability 86% (caregivers) and 76% (youth). Exploratory symptoms of depression, anxiety, distress and fatigue outcomes consistently improved mainly for caregivers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results suggest EPSI is feasible and acceptable and exploratory mental and physical efficacy outcomes are promising for use in a future confirmatory multisite efficacy trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":516935,"journal":{"name":"Psycho-Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"735-744"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pilot randomized psychosocial trial of a screening intervention in pediatric oncology.\",\"authors\":\"Maru Barrera,&nbsp;Leandra Desjardins,&nbsp;Soni Prasad,&nbsp;Wendy Shama,&nbsp;Sarah Alexander,&nbsp;Peter Szatmari,&nbsp;Kelly Hancock\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pon.5857\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Psychosocial screening is a standard of care in pediatric oncology, but there is limited information about how to intervene after screening. This pilot trial aimed to determine feasibility of the novel Enhanced Psychosocial Screening Intervention (EPSI) and explore its preliminary efficacy outcomes. We examined rates of recruitment, retention, intervention acceptability, and monthly distress screening completion, as well as exploratory efficacy outcomes (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System: depression, anxiety and fatigue; distress thermometer, pain and sleep).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Parallel-group randomized pilot trial: Caregiver-youth (10-17 years at enrollment, newly diagnosed with cancer) dyads were randomly allocated to either EPSI or standard care with 1:1 ratio allocation. EPSI consists of having a Psychosocial Navigator who shares screening results conducted near diagnosis and monthly for one year with treating teams and families, and provides recommendations tailored to screening results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Enrollment rate was 54% (38 dyads); retention was 90% and acceptability 86% (caregivers) and 76% (youth). Exploratory symptoms of depression, anxiety, distress and fatigue outcomes consistently improved mainly for caregivers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results suggest EPSI is feasible and acceptable and exploratory mental and physical efficacy outcomes are promising for use in a future confirmatory multisite efficacy trial.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":516935,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psycho-Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"735-744\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psycho-Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5857\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/11/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycho-Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5857","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

目的:心理社会筛查是儿科肿瘤学的标准治疗方法,但关于筛查后如何干预的信息有限。本试验旨在确定新型增强社会心理筛查干预(EPSI)的可行性,并探讨其初步疗效结果。我们检查了招募率、保留率、干预可接受性、每月窘迫筛查的完成率,以及探索性疗效结果(患者报告的结果测量信息系统:抑郁、焦虑和疲劳;痛苦温度计,疼痛和睡眠)。方法:平行组随机试验:护理人员-青年(入组时10-17岁,新诊断为癌症)以1:1的比例随机分配到EPSI或标准护理组。EPSI由心理社会导航员组成,该导航员在诊断前和一年内每月与治疗团队和家庭分享筛查结果,并根据筛查结果提供量身定制的建议。结果:入组率为54%(38对);保留率为90%,可接受性为86%(护理人员)和76%(青少年)。探索性抑郁、焦虑、痛苦和疲劳症状的改善主要针对照顾者。结论:结果表明EPSI是可行和可接受的,探索性的精神和身体疗效结果有望用于未来的验证性多地点疗效试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pilot randomized psychosocial trial of a screening intervention in pediatric oncology.

Objective: Psychosocial screening is a standard of care in pediatric oncology, but there is limited information about how to intervene after screening. This pilot trial aimed to determine feasibility of the novel Enhanced Psychosocial Screening Intervention (EPSI) and explore its preliminary efficacy outcomes. We examined rates of recruitment, retention, intervention acceptability, and monthly distress screening completion, as well as exploratory efficacy outcomes (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System: depression, anxiety and fatigue; distress thermometer, pain and sleep).

Methods: Parallel-group randomized pilot trial: Caregiver-youth (10-17 years at enrollment, newly diagnosed with cancer) dyads were randomly allocated to either EPSI or standard care with 1:1 ratio allocation. EPSI consists of having a Psychosocial Navigator who shares screening results conducted near diagnosis and monthly for one year with treating teams and families, and provides recommendations tailored to screening results.

Results: Enrollment rate was 54% (38 dyads); retention was 90% and acceptability 86% (caregivers) and 76% (youth). Exploratory symptoms of depression, anxiety, distress and fatigue outcomes consistently improved mainly for caregivers.

Conclusions: Results suggest EPSI is feasible and acceptable and exploratory mental and physical efficacy outcomes are promising for use in a future confirmatory multisite efficacy trial.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信