对于面部不对称的患者,远端骨段切除对于稳定髁突位置是否必要?

IF 2 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Ki Eun Hong, Eun Sup Shin, Jun Park, Ji Eon Yun, Chul Hoon Kim, Jung Han Kim, Bok Joo Kim
{"title":"对于面部不对称的患者,远端骨段切除对于稳定髁突位置是否必要?","authors":"Ki Eun Hong,&nbsp;Eun Sup Shin,&nbsp;Jun Park,&nbsp;Ji Eon Yun,&nbsp;Chul Hoon Kim,&nbsp;Jung Han Kim,&nbsp;Bok Joo Kim","doi":"10.1186/s40902-021-00325-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the postoperative change in the position and stability of the mandibular condyle after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSRO) and BSSRO with distal segmental ostectomy (DSO) in patients with facial asymmetry using 3D computed tomography.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The condyles of the patient diagnosed with facial asymmetry were divided into the deviated side (DS) and the non-deviated side (NDS). Group I, which was treated with BSSRO only, and Group II, which additionally received DSO along with BSSRO, were superimposed on the condyle using the pre-and postoperative 3D CT. The amount of condylar change in anteroposterior displacement, mediolateral displacement, and rotation was measured. The clinical symptoms of temporomandibular joint were also evaluated before and after surgery for each patient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between Groups I and II, there was no statistically significant difference in the anteroposterior condylar position on both DS and NDS. And also, there was no statistical difference between the two groups in the mediolateral change on DS but, statistically significant difference on NDS. The change in the rotation of the condyle was observed to rotate inward from both condylar heads of Groups I and II, and a statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups on both DS and NDS. Moreover, no difference in clinical temporomandibular joint symptoms was observed after surgery in each DS and NDS condyle of the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As a result of analyzing the condylar position change of the group treated with BSSRO alone and the group treated with BSSRO and DSO in patients with facial asymmetry, there were statistically significant differences in the mediolateral displacement of NDS and the condyle rotation of NDS and DS. However, the anteroposterior condylar position did not show any difference in the bilateral condyles. In addition, since worsening clinical symptoms of bilateral temporomandibular joint were not observed before and after surgery in both groups, it is concluded that it is not necessary to accompany DSO in patients with facial asymmetry (minimum 3 mm, maximum 7 mm).</p>","PeriodicalId":18357,"journal":{"name":"Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","volume":"43 1","pages":"41"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8608960/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is distal segment ostectomy essential for stabilization of the condylar position in patients with facial asymmetry?\",\"authors\":\"Ki Eun Hong,&nbsp;Eun Sup Shin,&nbsp;Jun Park,&nbsp;Ji Eon Yun,&nbsp;Chul Hoon Kim,&nbsp;Jung Han Kim,&nbsp;Bok Joo Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40902-021-00325-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the postoperative change in the position and stability of the mandibular condyle after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSRO) and BSSRO with distal segmental ostectomy (DSO) in patients with facial asymmetry using 3D computed tomography.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The condyles of the patient diagnosed with facial asymmetry were divided into the deviated side (DS) and the non-deviated side (NDS). Group I, which was treated with BSSRO only, and Group II, which additionally received DSO along with BSSRO, were superimposed on the condyle using the pre-and postoperative 3D CT. The amount of condylar change in anteroposterior displacement, mediolateral displacement, and rotation was measured. The clinical symptoms of temporomandibular joint were also evaluated before and after surgery for each patient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between Groups I and II, there was no statistically significant difference in the anteroposterior condylar position on both DS and NDS. And also, there was no statistical difference between the two groups in the mediolateral change on DS but, statistically significant difference on NDS. The change in the rotation of the condyle was observed to rotate inward from both condylar heads of Groups I and II, and a statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups on both DS and NDS. Moreover, no difference in clinical temporomandibular joint symptoms was observed after surgery in each DS and NDS condyle of the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As a result of analyzing the condylar position change of the group treated with BSSRO alone and the group treated with BSSRO and DSO in patients with facial asymmetry, there were statistically significant differences in the mediolateral displacement of NDS and the condyle rotation of NDS and DS. However, the anteroposterior condylar position did not show any difference in the bilateral condyles. In addition, since worsening clinical symptoms of bilateral temporomandibular joint were not observed before and after surgery in both groups, it is concluded that it is not necessary to accompany DSO in patients with facial asymmetry (minimum 3 mm, maximum 7 mm).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"41\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8608960/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-021-00325-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-021-00325-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:本回顾性研究的目的是利用三维计算机断层技术评价双侧矢状分裂支截骨术(BSSRO)和BSSRO联合远端节段截骨术(DSO)对面部不对称患者术后下颌髁突位置和稳定性的变化。方法:将诊断为面部不对称的患者的髁突分为偏侧(DS)和非偏侧(NDS)。第一组仅接受BSSRO治疗,第二组在BSSRO治疗的同时接受DSO治疗,通过术前和术后3D CT叠加在髁突上。测量髁突前后移位、中外侧移位和旋转的变化量。并对患者手术前后颞下颌关节的临床症状进行评价。结果:I组和II组在DS和NDS上髁突前后位置比较,差异均无统计学意义。同时,两组之间在DS的中外侧变化上没有统计学差异但在NDS上有统计学差异。观察到I组和II组髁突旋转的变化,从两个髁头向内旋转,两组在DS和NDS上的差异有统计学意义。此外,两组患者各DS和NDS髁术后临床颞下颌关节症状无差异。结论:通过对面部不对称患者单独使用BSSRO组和同时使用BSSRO和DSO组的髁突位置变化进行分析,NDS的中外侧位移和NDS与DS的髁突旋转有统计学意义。然而,双侧髁的前后位置没有显示任何差异。此外,由于两组患者在手术前后均未观察到双侧颞下颌关节临床症状的恶化,因此,对于面部不对称(最小3 mm,最大7 mm)的患者,不需要伴随DSO。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Is distal segment ostectomy essential for stabilization of the condylar position in patients with facial asymmetry?

Is distal segment ostectomy essential for stabilization of the condylar position in patients with facial asymmetry?

Is distal segment ostectomy essential for stabilization of the condylar position in patients with facial asymmetry?

Is distal segment ostectomy essential for stabilization of the condylar position in patients with facial asymmetry?

Background: The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the postoperative change in the position and stability of the mandibular condyle after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSRO) and BSSRO with distal segmental ostectomy (DSO) in patients with facial asymmetry using 3D computed tomography.

Methods: The condyles of the patient diagnosed with facial asymmetry were divided into the deviated side (DS) and the non-deviated side (NDS). Group I, which was treated with BSSRO only, and Group II, which additionally received DSO along with BSSRO, were superimposed on the condyle using the pre-and postoperative 3D CT. The amount of condylar change in anteroposterior displacement, mediolateral displacement, and rotation was measured. The clinical symptoms of temporomandibular joint were also evaluated before and after surgery for each patient.

Results: Between Groups I and II, there was no statistically significant difference in the anteroposterior condylar position on both DS and NDS. And also, there was no statistical difference between the two groups in the mediolateral change on DS but, statistically significant difference on NDS. The change in the rotation of the condyle was observed to rotate inward from both condylar heads of Groups I and II, and a statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups on both DS and NDS. Moreover, no difference in clinical temporomandibular joint symptoms was observed after surgery in each DS and NDS condyle of the two groups.

Conclusions: As a result of analyzing the condylar position change of the group treated with BSSRO alone and the group treated with BSSRO and DSO in patients with facial asymmetry, there were statistically significant differences in the mediolateral displacement of NDS and the condyle rotation of NDS and DS. However, the anteroposterior condylar position did not show any difference in the bilateral condyles. In addition, since worsening clinical symptoms of bilateral temporomandibular joint were not observed before and after surgery in both groups, it is concluded that it is not necessary to accompany DSO in patients with facial asymmetry (minimum 3 mm, maximum 7 mm).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信