基于1999年和2010年WHO标准的精液总活动精子数分析。

IF 1.9
Patrícia de Moraes De Zorzi, Ana Paula de Souza Kussler, Anita Mylius Pimentel, Edison Capp, Helena von Eye Corleta
{"title":"基于1999年和2010年WHO标准的精液总活动精子数分析。","authors":"Patrícia de Moraes De Zorzi,&nbsp;Ana Paula de Souza Kussler,&nbsp;Anita Mylius Pimentel,&nbsp;Edison Capp,&nbsp;Helena von Eye Corleta","doi":"10.5935/1518-0557.20210066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Approximately 15% of the couples suffer from infertility. Half of the cases of infertility are due to male factors. Several sperm function tests have been proposed to evaluate male fertility, but sperm analysis is still the first and most important diagnostic test for male infertility. The prognostic value of semen characteristics such as concentration, morphology and motility markers are often confused with male infertility. Evaluation of seminal parameters and classification for normality remains a frequent topic of discussion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study evaluated 477 semen samples from men undergoing investigation or infertility treatment between 2011 and 2015.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The spermograms of 401 patients were deemed abnormal based on the 1999 World Health Organization (WHO) criteria; the number changed to 223 when the spermograms were assessed based on the 2010 WHO criteria and to 200 when Total Motile Sperm Count (TMSC) was used as the criterion. Sperm morphology was the item in the criteria that most significantly changed spermogram classification. Normality parameters became less rigid from 1999 to 2010, thereby significantly changing the proportion of individuals no longer described as infertile/subfertile.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The classification based on TMSC could not differentiate between fertile and infertile subjects for not taking sperm morphology into account. Nevertheless, it may be helpful in cases where intrauterine insemination is indicated.</p>","PeriodicalId":520656,"journal":{"name":"JBRA assisted reproduction","volume":" ","pages":"261-266"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9118975/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Semen Analysis of Total Motile Sperm Count Based on the 1999 and 2010 WHO Criteria.\",\"authors\":\"Patrícia de Moraes De Zorzi,&nbsp;Ana Paula de Souza Kussler,&nbsp;Anita Mylius Pimentel,&nbsp;Edison Capp,&nbsp;Helena von Eye Corleta\",\"doi\":\"10.5935/1518-0557.20210066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Approximately 15% of the couples suffer from infertility. Half of the cases of infertility are due to male factors. Several sperm function tests have been proposed to evaluate male fertility, but sperm analysis is still the first and most important diagnostic test for male infertility. The prognostic value of semen characteristics such as concentration, morphology and motility markers are often confused with male infertility. Evaluation of seminal parameters and classification for normality remains a frequent topic of discussion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study evaluated 477 semen samples from men undergoing investigation or infertility treatment between 2011 and 2015.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The spermograms of 401 patients were deemed abnormal based on the 1999 World Health Organization (WHO) criteria; the number changed to 223 when the spermograms were assessed based on the 2010 WHO criteria and to 200 when Total Motile Sperm Count (TMSC) was used as the criterion. Sperm morphology was the item in the criteria that most significantly changed spermogram classification. Normality parameters became less rigid from 1999 to 2010, thereby significantly changing the proportion of individuals no longer described as infertile/subfertile.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The classification based on TMSC could not differentiate between fertile and infertile subjects for not taking sperm morphology into account. Nevertheless, it may be helpful in cases where intrauterine insemination is indicated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JBRA assisted reproduction\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"261-266\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9118975/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JBRA assisted reproduction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20210066\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBRA assisted reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20210066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:大约15%的夫妇患有不孕症。一半的不孕症是由男性因素引起的。一些精子功能测试已被提议用于评估男性生育能力,但精子分析仍然是男性不育的第一个也是最重要的诊断测试。精液特征如浓度、形态和运动指标的预后价值常与男性不育相混淆。种子参数的评估和正常状态的分类仍然是一个经常讨论的话题。方法:本研究评估了2011年至2015年间接受调查或不孕症治疗的男性的477份精液样本。结果:401例患者精子图按1999年世界卫生组织(WHO)标准诊断为异常;根据2010年世界卫生组织标准评估精子图时,这一数字变为223,而以总活动精子计数(TMSC)作为标准时,这一数字变为200。精子形态是改变精子图分类最显著的标准项。从1999年到2010年,正态参数变得不那么严格,从而显著改变了不再被描述为不育/低生育能力的个体的比例。结论:基于TMSC的分类由于未考虑精子形态,不能区分可育和不育受试者。然而,它可能是有帮助的情况下,宫内人工授精是指。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Semen Analysis of Total Motile Sperm Count Based on the 1999 and 2010 WHO Criteria.

Semen Analysis of Total Motile Sperm Count Based on the 1999 and 2010 WHO Criteria.

Objective: Approximately 15% of the couples suffer from infertility. Half of the cases of infertility are due to male factors. Several sperm function tests have been proposed to evaluate male fertility, but sperm analysis is still the first and most important diagnostic test for male infertility. The prognostic value of semen characteristics such as concentration, morphology and motility markers are often confused with male infertility. Evaluation of seminal parameters and classification for normality remains a frequent topic of discussion.

Methods: This study evaluated 477 semen samples from men undergoing investigation or infertility treatment between 2011 and 2015.

Results: The spermograms of 401 patients were deemed abnormal based on the 1999 World Health Organization (WHO) criteria; the number changed to 223 when the spermograms were assessed based on the 2010 WHO criteria and to 200 when Total Motile Sperm Count (TMSC) was used as the criterion. Sperm morphology was the item in the criteria that most significantly changed spermogram classification. Normality parameters became less rigid from 1999 to 2010, thereby significantly changing the proportion of individuals no longer described as infertile/subfertile.

Conclusions: The classification based on TMSC could not differentiate between fertile and infertile subjects for not taking sperm morphology into account. Nevertheless, it may be helpful in cases where intrauterine insemination is indicated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信