视神经黄斑窝病:临床特征和治疗选择。

IF 0.9 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Current Ophthalmology Reports Pub Date : 2021-12-01 Epub Date: 2021-10-07 DOI:10.1007/s40135-021-00274-0
Prashanth G Iyer, Harry W Flynn, Kenneth C Fan, Audina M Berrocal, Raquel Goldhardt
{"title":"视神经黄斑窝病:临床特征和治疗选择。","authors":"Prashanth G Iyer,&nbsp;Harry W Flynn,&nbsp;Kenneth C Fan,&nbsp;Audina M Berrocal,&nbsp;Raquel Goldhardt","doi":"10.1007/s40135-021-00274-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>In this article, we review the pathogenesis, clinical features, imaging modalities and latest management options for optic pit maculopathy (OPM).</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The pathogenesis of OPM remains to be unclear, but imaging tools such as optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT angiography are enhancing our knowledge. Observation continues to be the best management strategy for patients with good visual acuity, and many cases have demonstrated spontaneous resolution. For more advanced, progressive vision loss, treatment options involving vitrectomy can be considered and discussed with the patient. Supplementary techniques to vitrectomy have been reported in small studies with relative success such as glial tissue peeling, inverted internal limiting membrane flap, optic pit plugging, and retinal fenestration.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>While there are multiple treatment options available for OPM, there is no consensus on the technique and surgical timing. Individual patient factors and the risks-benefits of treatment must be taken into account in guiding management. Larger clinical trials will further assist in decision making for treating OPM.</p>","PeriodicalId":10836,"journal":{"name":"Current Ophthalmology Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8845502/pdf/nihms-1757459.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optic Pit Maculopathy: Clinical Features and Management Options.\",\"authors\":\"Prashanth G Iyer,&nbsp;Harry W Flynn,&nbsp;Kenneth C Fan,&nbsp;Audina M Berrocal,&nbsp;Raquel Goldhardt\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40135-021-00274-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>In this article, we review the pathogenesis, clinical features, imaging modalities and latest management options for optic pit maculopathy (OPM).</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The pathogenesis of OPM remains to be unclear, but imaging tools such as optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT angiography are enhancing our knowledge. Observation continues to be the best management strategy for patients with good visual acuity, and many cases have demonstrated spontaneous resolution. For more advanced, progressive vision loss, treatment options involving vitrectomy can be considered and discussed with the patient. Supplementary techniques to vitrectomy have been reported in small studies with relative success such as glial tissue peeling, inverted internal limiting membrane flap, optic pit plugging, and retinal fenestration.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>While there are multiple treatment options available for OPM, there is no consensus on the technique and surgical timing. Individual patient factors and the risks-benefits of treatment must be taken into account in guiding management. Larger clinical trials will further assist in decision making for treating OPM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10836,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Ophthalmology Reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8845502/pdf/nihms-1757459.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Ophthalmology Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40135-021-00274-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/10/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Ophthalmology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40135-021-00274-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

综述目的:本文综述了视神经黄斑窝病(OPM)的发病机制、临床特征、影像学表现和最新治疗方案。最近发现:OPM的发病机制尚不清楚,但成像工具,如光学相干断层扫描(OCT)和OCT血管造影正在增强我们的知识。对于视力良好的患者,观察仍然是最好的治疗策略,许多病例显示自发消退。对于更严重的进行性视力丧失,可以考虑玻璃体切除术等治疗方案,并与患者讨论。在一些小型研究中,玻璃体切除术的辅助技术如胶质组织剥离、内限定膜瓣、视神经窝堵塞和视网膜开窗等都取得了相对的成功。摘要:虽然有多种治疗方案可用于OPM,但在技术和手术时机方面尚无共识。在指导管理时,必须考虑到患者的个体因素和治疗的风险-收益。更大规模的临床试验将进一步帮助制定治疗OPM的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optic Pit Maculopathy: Clinical Features and Management Options.

Purpose of review: In this article, we review the pathogenesis, clinical features, imaging modalities and latest management options for optic pit maculopathy (OPM).

Recent findings: The pathogenesis of OPM remains to be unclear, but imaging tools such as optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT angiography are enhancing our knowledge. Observation continues to be the best management strategy for patients with good visual acuity, and many cases have demonstrated spontaneous resolution. For more advanced, progressive vision loss, treatment options involving vitrectomy can be considered and discussed with the patient. Supplementary techniques to vitrectomy have been reported in small studies with relative success such as glial tissue peeling, inverted internal limiting membrane flap, optic pit plugging, and retinal fenestration.

Summary: While there are multiple treatment options available for OPM, there is no consensus on the technique and surgical timing. Individual patient factors and the risks-benefits of treatment must be taken into account in guiding management. Larger clinical trials will further assist in decision making for treating OPM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Ophthalmology Reports
Current Ophthalmology Reports Medicine-Ophthalmology
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: This journal aims to offer expert review articles on the most significant recent developments in the field of ophthalmology. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions, the journal intends to serve those who diagnose, treat, manage, and prevent ocular conditions and diseases. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas across the field. Section Editors select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An Editorial Board of more than 20 internationally diverse members reviews the annual table of contents, ensures that topics include emerging research, and suggests topics of special importance to their country/region. Topics covered may include age-related macular degeneration; diabetic retinopathy; dry eye syndrome; glaucoma; pediatric ophthalmology; ocular infections; refractive surgery; and stem cell therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信