居住在澳大利亚地区的老年妇女的衰弱与社会经济地位、保健利用和生活质量的关系。

Shi-Jynn Yong, Stella M Gwini, Monica C Tembo, Boon L Ng, Chong Han Low, Robert G Malon, Trisha L Dunning, Julie A Pasco, Mark A Kotowicz
{"title":"居住在澳大利亚地区的老年妇女的衰弱与社会经济地位、保健利用和生活质量的关系。","authors":"Shi-Jynn Yong,&nbsp;Stella M Gwini,&nbsp;Monica C Tembo,&nbsp;Boon L Ng,&nbsp;Chong Han Low,&nbsp;Robert G Malon,&nbsp;Trisha L Dunning,&nbsp;Julie A Pasco,&nbsp;Mark A Kotowicz","doi":"10.22540/JFSF-06-209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The health and well-being of older women may be influenced by frailty and low socioeconomic status (SES). This study examined the association between frailty and SES, healthcare utilisation and quality of life (QOL) among older women in regional Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional analysis of the Geelong Osteoporosis Study was conducted on 360 women (ages ≥60yr) in the 15-year follow up. Frailty was identified using modified Fried's phenotype. Individual SES measures and healthcare utilisation were documented by questionnaire. Area-based SES was determined by cross-referencing residential addresses with the Australian Bureau of Statistics Index of Relative Socio-economic Advantage and Disadvantage (IRSAD). QOL was measured using the Australian World Health Organisation Quality of Life Instrument (WHOQoL-Bref). Multinomial logistic regression was conducted with frailty groupings as outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-two (17.2%) participants were frail, 199 (55.3%) pre-frail and 99 (27.5%) robust. Frail participants were older with higher body mass index. Frailty was associated with lower education but not marital status, occupation or IRSAD. Strong associations with frailty were demonstrated for all WHOQoL-Bref domains. Frailty was associated with more primary care doctor visits (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This population-based study highlights the significant impact of frailty on older women, indicating reduced QOL and increased primary care doctor visits.</p>","PeriodicalId":73754,"journal":{"name":"Journal of frailty, sarcopenia and falls","volume":"6 4","pages":"209-217"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9a/7f/JFSF-6-209.PMC8649863.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frailty associations with socioeconomic status, healthcare utilisation and quality of life among older women residing in regional Australia.\",\"authors\":\"Shi-Jynn Yong,&nbsp;Stella M Gwini,&nbsp;Monica C Tembo,&nbsp;Boon L Ng,&nbsp;Chong Han Low,&nbsp;Robert G Malon,&nbsp;Trisha L Dunning,&nbsp;Julie A Pasco,&nbsp;Mark A Kotowicz\",\"doi\":\"10.22540/JFSF-06-209\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The health and well-being of older women may be influenced by frailty and low socioeconomic status (SES). This study examined the association between frailty and SES, healthcare utilisation and quality of life (QOL) among older women in regional Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional analysis of the Geelong Osteoporosis Study was conducted on 360 women (ages ≥60yr) in the 15-year follow up. Frailty was identified using modified Fried's phenotype. Individual SES measures and healthcare utilisation were documented by questionnaire. Area-based SES was determined by cross-referencing residential addresses with the Australian Bureau of Statistics Index of Relative Socio-economic Advantage and Disadvantage (IRSAD). QOL was measured using the Australian World Health Organisation Quality of Life Instrument (WHOQoL-Bref). Multinomial logistic regression was conducted with frailty groupings as outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-two (17.2%) participants were frail, 199 (55.3%) pre-frail and 99 (27.5%) robust. Frail participants were older with higher body mass index. Frailty was associated with lower education but not marital status, occupation or IRSAD. Strong associations with frailty were demonstrated for all WHOQoL-Bref domains. Frailty was associated with more primary care doctor visits (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This population-based study highlights the significant impact of frailty on older women, indicating reduced QOL and increased primary care doctor visits.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73754,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of frailty, sarcopenia and falls\",\"volume\":\"6 4\",\"pages\":\"209-217\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9a/7f/JFSF-6-209.PMC8649863.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of frailty, sarcopenia and falls\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22540/JFSF-06-209\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of frailty, sarcopenia and falls","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22540/JFSF-06-209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:老年妇女的健康和福祉可能受到身体虚弱和社会经济地位低下的影响。本研究调查了澳大利亚地区老年妇女中虚弱与社会经济地位、医疗保健利用和生活质量(QOL)之间的关系。方法:对360名年龄≥60岁的妇女进行15年随访,对Geelong骨质疏松症研究进行横断面分析。利用改良的Fried’s表型鉴定其脆性。通过问卷调查记录个人SES测量和医疗保健利用情况。基于区域的社会经济地位是通过与澳大利亚统计局相对社会经济优势和劣势指数(IRSAD)交叉参考住宅地址来确定的。生活质量采用澳大利亚世界卫生组织生活质量量表(WHOQoL-Bref)测量。以脆弱分组作为结果,进行多项逻辑回归。结果:体弱多病者62人(17.2%),体弱多病者199人(55.3%),健全人99人(27.5%)。身体虚弱的参与者年龄较大,身体质量指数较高。身体虚弱与受教育程度低有关,但与婚姻状况、职业或IRSAD无关。所有WHOQoL-Bref域都显示出与脆弱的强烈关联。结论:这项以人群为基础的研究强调了衰弱对老年妇女的显著影响,表明生活质量降低,初级保健医生就诊增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Frailty associations with socioeconomic status, healthcare utilisation and quality of life among older women residing in regional Australia.

Objectives: The health and well-being of older women may be influenced by frailty and low socioeconomic status (SES). This study examined the association between frailty and SES, healthcare utilisation and quality of life (QOL) among older women in regional Australia.

Methods: Cross-sectional analysis of the Geelong Osteoporosis Study was conducted on 360 women (ages ≥60yr) in the 15-year follow up. Frailty was identified using modified Fried's phenotype. Individual SES measures and healthcare utilisation were documented by questionnaire. Area-based SES was determined by cross-referencing residential addresses with the Australian Bureau of Statistics Index of Relative Socio-economic Advantage and Disadvantage (IRSAD). QOL was measured using the Australian World Health Organisation Quality of Life Instrument (WHOQoL-Bref). Multinomial logistic regression was conducted with frailty groupings as outcome.

Results: Sixty-two (17.2%) participants were frail, 199 (55.3%) pre-frail and 99 (27.5%) robust. Frail participants were older with higher body mass index. Frailty was associated with lower education but not marital status, occupation or IRSAD. Strong associations with frailty were demonstrated for all WHOQoL-Bref domains. Frailty was associated with more primary care doctor visits (p<0.001).

Conclusions: This population-based study highlights the significant impact of frailty on older women, indicating reduced QOL and increased primary care doctor visits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信