PLATO试验中的感染和死亡

Victor Serebruany, Jean-Francois Tanguay
{"title":"PLATO试验中的感染和死亡","authors":"Victor Serebruany,&nbsp;Jean-Francois Tanguay","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1736638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>  Cardiovascular benefits of aggressive dual antiplatelet therapy may be associated with extra risks including bleeding, cancer, and infections discovered first for prasugrel in the TRial to assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by optimizing platelet InhibitioN with prasugrel (TRITON) trial. Ticagrelor in PLATO also caused slightly more infections but surprisingly less sepsis-related deaths (SRD) than clopidogrel. However, verified infection fatalities in PLATO were lacking from the public domain. We obtained the complete Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-issued primary causes death list, matched it with the few local site records dataset and analyzed the patterns of infections and deaths reported in PLATO. <b>Methods</b>  Among infections, the FDA spreadsheet contains only two primary death codes for pneumonia (12-2) and SRD (12-8). We obtained local evidence for two pneumonia and two SRD and matched those with the FDA records. We assessed how SRD patterns were reported among nonvascular death's dataset. <b>Results</b>  The FDA PLATO records indicate that clopidogrel caused numerically less ( <i>n</i>  = 8) primary pneumonia deaths than ticagrelor ( <i>n</i>  = 10) but over three times more SRD ( <i>n</i>  = 23/7). Among matched verifiable outcomes, both pneumonia deaths were correct, but two clopidogrel SRD were incorrect. Of the remaining 21 clopidogrel SRD, 6 were reported as two separate closed paired entries in Brazil (lines 76 and 78 and 86 and 88) and India (lines 436 and 440), suggesting last minute addition of potentially incorrect SRD reports. Four ticagrelor SRD (lines 24,193,467 and 650) were \"compensated\" with close or next in line clopidogrel SRD entries (lines 22,195,468 and 651). <b>Conclusion</b>  The FDA-issued evidence suggests no benefit of ticagrelor in preventing deaths from infections with slightly more pneumonia deaths, with possible misreporting of SRD in PLATO. These findings require an in-depth precise review of sepsis deaths in this trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":22238,"journal":{"name":"TH Open: Companion Journal to Thrombosis and Haemostasis","volume":"5 4","pages":"e503-e506"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8575605/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Infections Deaths in the PLATO Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Victor Serebruany,&nbsp;Jean-Francois Tanguay\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0041-1736638\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b>  Cardiovascular benefits of aggressive dual antiplatelet therapy may be associated with extra risks including bleeding, cancer, and infections discovered first for prasugrel in the TRial to assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by optimizing platelet InhibitioN with prasugrel (TRITON) trial. Ticagrelor in PLATO also caused slightly more infections but surprisingly less sepsis-related deaths (SRD) than clopidogrel. However, verified infection fatalities in PLATO were lacking from the public domain. We obtained the complete Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-issued primary causes death list, matched it with the few local site records dataset and analyzed the patterns of infections and deaths reported in PLATO. <b>Methods</b>  Among infections, the FDA spreadsheet contains only two primary death codes for pneumonia (12-2) and SRD (12-8). We obtained local evidence for two pneumonia and two SRD and matched those with the FDA records. We assessed how SRD patterns were reported among nonvascular death's dataset. <b>Results</b>  The FDA PLATO records indicate that clopidogrel caused numerically less ( <i>n</i>  = 8) primary pneumonia deaths than ticagrelor ( <i>n</i>  = 10) but over three times more SRD ( <i>n</i>  = 23/7). Among matched verifiable outcomes, both pneumonia deaths were correct, but two clopidogrel SRD were incorrect. Of the remaining 21 clopidogrel SRD, 6 were reported as two separate closed paired entries in Brazil (lines 76 and 78 and 86 and 88) and India (lines 436 and 440), suggesting last minute addition of potentially incorrect SRD reports. Four ticagrelor SRD (lines 24,193,467 and 650) were \\\"compensated\\\" with close or next in line clopidogrel SRD entries (lines 22,195,468 and 651). <b>Conclusion</b>  The FDA-issued evidence suggests no benefit of ticagrelor in preventing deaths from infections with slightly more pneumonia deaths, with possible misreporting of SRD in PLATO. These findings require an in-depth precise review of sepsis deaths in this trial.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TH Open: Companion Journal to Thrombosis and Haemostasis\",\"volume\":\"5 4\",\"pages\":\"e503-e506\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8575605/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TH Open: Companion Journal to Thrombosis and Haemostasis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1736638\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TH Open: Companion Journal to Thrombosis and Haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1736638","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

积极的双重抗血小板治疗的心血管益处可能与额外的风险相关,包括出血、癌症和感染,在通过优化普拉格雷抑制血小板(TRITON)试验评估治疗结果改善的试验中首次发现普拉格雷。与氯吡格雷相比,替格瑞洛在PLATO中引起的感染也略多,但败血症相关死亡(SRD)却少得惊人。然而,公共领域缺乏经证实的PLATO感染死亡人数。我们获得了美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)发布的完整的主要死因死亡清单,将其与少数当地站点记录数据集进行匹配,并分析了PLATO报告的感染和死亡模式。方法在感染病例中,FDA电子表格仅包含肺炎(12-2)和SRD(12-8)两种主要死亡代码。我们获得了两例肺炎和两例SRD的当地证据,并与FDA的记录相匹配。我们评估了如何在非血管性死亡数据集中报告SRD模式。结果FDA PLATO记录显示,氯吡格雷导致的原发性肺炎死亡人数(n = 8)少于替格瑞洛(n = 10),但SRD是替格瑞洛的3倍多(n = 23/7)。在匹配的可验证结果中,两个肺炎死亡都是正确的,但两个氯吡格雷SRD是不正确的。在剩余的21个氯吡格雷SRD中,有6个在巴西(第76和78行、86和88行)和印度(第436和440行)被报告为两个单独的封闭成对条目,这表明最后一分钟添加了可能不正确的SRD报告。4个替格瑞洛SRD(第24,193,467和650行)被氯吡格雷SRD条目(第22,195,468和651行)“补偿”。fda发布的证据表明,替格瑞洛在预防感染死亡方面没有益处,肺炎死亡人数略多,PLATO中可能存在SRD的误报。这些发现需要对该试验中败血症死亡进行深入精确的回顾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Infections Deaths in the PLATO Trial.

Background  Cardiovascular benefits of aggressive dual antiplatelet therapy may be associated with extra risks including bleeding, cancer, and infections discovered first for prasugrel in the TRial to assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by optimizing platelet InhibitioN with prasugrel (TRITON) trial. Ticagrelor in PLATO also caused slightly more infections but surprisingly less sepsis-related deaths (SRD) than clopidogrel. However, verified infection fatalities in PLATO were lacking from the public domain. We obtained the complete Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-issued primary causes death list, matched it with the few local site records dataset and analyzed the patterns of infections and deaths reported in PLATO. Methods  Among infections, the FDA spreadsheet contains only two primary death codes for pneumonia (12-2) and SRD (12-8). We obtained local evidence for two pneumonia and two SRD and matched those with the FDA records. We assessed how SRD patterns were reported among nonvascular death's dataset. Results  The FDA PLATO records indicate that clopidogrel caused numerically less ( n  = 8) primary pneumonia deaths than ticagrelor ( n  = 10) but over three times more SRD ( n  = 23/7). Among matched verifiable outcomes, both pneumonia deaths were correct, but two clopidogrel SRD were incorrect. Of the remaining 21 clopidogrel SRD, 6 were reported as two separate closed paired entries in Brazil (lines 76 and 78 and 86 and 88) and India (lines 436 and 440), suggesting last minute addition of potentially incorrect SRD reports. Four ticagrelor SRD (lines 24,193,467 and 650) were "compensated" with close or next in line clopidogrel SRD entries (lines 22,195,468 and 651). Conclusion  The FDA-issued evidence suggests no benefit of ticagrelor in preventing deaths from infections with slightly more pneumonia deaths, with possible misreporting of SRD in PLATO. These findings require an in-depth precise review of sepsis deaths in this trial.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信