糖精测试:方法验证和文献系统回顾。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Ent-Ear Nose & Throat Journal Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2021-12-16 DOI:10.1177/01455613211064044
Pasquale Caponnetto, Rosalia Emma, Francesca Benfatto, Salvatore Ferlito, Alessandro Gulino, Antonino Maniaci, Jerome R Lechien, Angelo Ingrassia, Salvatore Cocuzza, Riccardo Polosa
{"title":"糖精测试:方法验证和文献系统回顾。","authors":"Pasquale Caponnetto, Rosalia Emma, Francesca Benfatto, Salvatore Ferlito, Alessandro Gulino, Antonino Maniaci, Jerome R Lechien, Angelo Ingrassia, Salvatore Cocuzza, Riccardo Polosa","doi":"10.1177/01455613211064044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Saccharin test (ST) is a convenient method to assess the efficiency of mucociliary clearance, the primary defense mechanism of the upper airways' tract. The study objectives are to: (1) substantiate its short- (3 days) and long-term (30 days) repeatability; (2) assess its tolerability; (3) conduct a systematic literature review and to compare our results with the existing evidence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-nine healthy subjects were enrolled in an observational prospective study to perform an ST on three separate visits (at baseline; at follow-up visits at day 3 and at day 30). Transit times were recorded and self-reported nasal and general symptoms noted. A systematic review of the literature was conducted to compare our results with the existing literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean values (±SD) of ST transit time (STTT) were 7.085 (±2.19), 7.788 (±2.11), and 7.790 (±2.06) minutes at baseline, day 3, and day 30, respectively. Significant linear regression analysis was observed between day 3 and baseline (<i>r</i> = .193; <i>P</i> = .019) and day 30 and baseline (<i>r</i> = .182 <i>P</i> = .024). Significant agreement for the intrasession repeatability was observed with an ICC = .354 (<i>P</i> = .001). Outcomes' comparisons between baseline vs day 3 (<i>P</i> = .197) and baseline vs day 30 (<i>P</i> = .173) were not statistically significant. ST was well tolerated. Concordance with existing literature's data and high level of STTT repeatability were confirmed by the qualitative analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>STTT reproducibility was good both in the short- and long-term. ST tolerability was very good. Our study data are consistent with the existing literature, indicating ST as a sound methodology for detection of early respiratory health changes and for specific regulatory application in respiratory research.</p>","PeriodicalId":51041,"journal":{"name":"Ent-Ear Nose & Throat Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Saccharin test: Methodological validation and systematic review of the literature.\",\"authors\":\"Pasquale Caponnetto, Rosalia Emma, Francesca Benfatto, Salvatore Ferlito, Alessandro Gulino, Antonino Maniaci, Jerome R Lechien, Angelo Ingrassia, Salvatore Cocuzza, Riccardo Polosa\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01455613211064044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Saccharin test (ST) is a convenient method to assess the efficiency of mucociliary clearance, the primary defense mechanism of the upper airways' tract. The study objectives are to: (1) substantiate its short- (3 days) and long-term (30 days) repeatability; (2) assess its tolerability; (3) conduct a systematic literature review and to compare our results with the existing evidence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-nine healthy subjects were enrolled in an observational prospective study to perform an ST on three separate visits (at baseline; at follow-up visits at day 3 and at day 30). Transit times were recorded and self-reported nasal and general symptoms noted. A systematic review of the literature was conducted to compare our results with the existing literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean values (±SD) of ST transit time (STTT) were 7.085 (±2.19), 7.788 (±2.11), and 7.790 (±2.06) minutes at baseline, day 3, and day 30, respectively. Significant linear regression analysis was observed between day 3 and baseline (<i>r</i> = .193; <i>P</i> = .019) and day 30 and baseline (<i>r</i> = .182 <i>P</i> = .024). Significant agreement for the intrasession repeatability was observed with an ICC = .354 (<i>P</i> = .001). Outcomes' comparisons between baseline vs day 3 (<i>P</i> = .197) and baseline vs day 30 (<i>P</i> = .173) were not statistically significant. ST was well tolerated. Concordance with existing literature's data and high level of STTT repeatability were confirmed by the qualitative analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>STTT reproducibility was good both in the short- and long-term. ST tolerability was very good. Our study data are consistent with the existing literature, indicating ST as a sound methodology for detection of early respiratory health changes and for specific regulatory application in respiratory research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ent-Ear Nose & Throat Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ent-Ear Nose & Throat Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01455613211064044\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/12/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ent-Ear Nose & Throat Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01455613211064044","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:糖精试验(ST)是一种评估上呼吸道主要防御机制--黏膜纤毛清除率的便捷方法。研究目的是(1)证实其短期(3 天)和长期(30 天)的可重复性;(2)评估其耐受性;(3)进行系统性文献回顾,并将我们的结果与现有证据进行比较:方法:29 名健康受试者参加了一项观察性前瞻研究,在三次不同的访问(基线、第 3 天和第 30 天的随访)中进行了 ST 测试。研究人员记录了转运时间,并记录了自我报告的鼻部和全身症状。为了将我们的结果与现有文献进行比较,我们对文献进行了系统回顾:在基线、第 3 天和第 30 天,ST 过境时间 (STTT) 的平均值(±SD)分别为 7.085 分钟(±2.19)、7.788 分钟(±2.11)和 7.790 分钟(±2.06)。在第 3 天和基线(r = .193; P = .019)以及第 30 天和基线(r = .182 P = .024)之间观察到显著的线性回归分析。观察发现,会期内的可重复性具有显著的一致性,ICC = .354 (P = .001)。基线与第 3 天(P = .197)和基线与第 30 天(P = .173)之间的结果比较无统计学意义。ST 耐受性良好。定性分析证实了 STTT 与现有文献数据的一致性和高水平的 STTT 可重复性:结论:短期和长期 STTT 重现性都很好。ST耐受性非常好。我们的研究数据与现有文献一致,表明 STTT 是检测早期呼吸系统健康变化的可靠方法,可用于呼吸系统研究的特定监管应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Saccharin test: Methodological validation and systematic review of the literature.

Objectives: Saccharin test (ST) is a convenient method to assess the efficiency of mucociliary clearance, the primary defense mechanism of the upper airways' tract. The study objectives are to: (1) substantiate its short- (3 days) and long-term (30 days) repeatability; (2) assess its tolerability; (3) conduct a systematic literature review and to compare our results with the existing evidence.

Methods: Twenty-nine healthy subjects were enrolled in an observational prospective study to perform an ST on three separate visits (at baseline; at follow-up visits at day 3 and at day 30). Transit times were recorded and self-reported nasal and general symptoms noted. A systematic review of the literature was conducted to compare our results with the existing literature.

Results: The mean values (±SD) of ST transit time (STTT) were 7.085 (±2.19), 7.788 (±2.11), and 7.790 (±2.06) minutes at baseline, day 3, and day 30, respectively. Significant linear regression analysis was observed between day 3 and baseline (r = .193; P = .019) and day 30 and baseline (r = .182 P = .024). Significant agreement for the intrasession repeatability was observed with an ICC = .354 (P = .001). Outcomes' comparisons between baseline vs day 3 (P = .197) and baseline vs day 30 (P = .173) were not statistically significant. ST was well tolerated. Concordance with existing literature's data and high level of STTT repeatability were confirmed by the qualitative analysis.

Conclusion: STTT reproducibility was good both in the short- and long-term. ST tolerability was very good. Our study data are consistent with the existing literature, indicating ST as a sound methodology for detection of early respiratory health changes and for specific regulatory application in respiratory research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ent-Ear Nose & Throat Journal
Ent-Ear Nose & Throat Journal 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
385
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ear, Nose & Throat Journal provides practical, peer-reviewed original clinical articles, highlighting scientific research relevant to clinical care, and case reports that describe unusual entities or innovative approaches to treatment and case management. ENT Journal utilizes multiple channels to deliver authoritative and timely content that informs, engages, and shapes the industry now and into the future.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信