将定量推导的人格-心理病理学模型与神经科学联系起来。

Q3 Medicine
Personality Neuroscience Pub Date : 2021-10-08 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1017/pen.2021.3
Robert D Latzman, Robert F Krueger, Colin G DeYoung, Giorgia Michelini
{"title":"将定量推导的人格-心理病理学模型与神经科学联系起来。","authors":"Robert D Latzman, Robert F Krueger, Colin G DeYoung, Giorgia Michelini","doi":"10.1017/pen.2021.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Traditionally, personality has been conceptualized in terms of <i>dimensions</i> of human experience - habitual ways of thinking, feeling, and behaving. By contrast, psychopathology has traditionally been conceptualized in terms of <i>categories</i> of disorder - disordered thinking, feeling, and behaving. The empirical literature, however, routinely shows that psychopathology does not coalesce into readily distinguishable categories. Indeed, psychopathology tends to delineate dimensions that are relatively similar to dimensions of personality. In this special issue of <i>Personality Neuroscience</i>, authors took up the challenge of reconceptualizing personality and psychopathology in terms of connected and interrelated dimensions, and they considered the utility of pursuing neuroscientific inquiry from this more integrative perspective. In this editorial article, we provide the relevant background to the interface between personality, psychopathology, and neuroscience; summarize contributions to the special issue; and point toward directions for continued research and refinement. All told, it is evident that quantitatively derived, integrative models of personality-psychopathology represent a particularly promising conduit for advancing our understanding of the neurobiological foundation of human experience, both functional and dysfunctional.</p>","PeriodicalId":36424,"journal":{"name":"Personality Neuroscience","volume":"4 ","pages":"e4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ca/b7/S2513988621000031a.PMC8640674.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Connecting quantitatively derived personality-psychopathology models and neuroscience.\",\"authors\":\"Robert D Latzman, Robert F Krueger, Colin G DeYoung, Giorgia Michelini\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/pen.2021.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Traditionally, personality has been conceptualized in terms of <i>dimensions</i> of human experience - habitual ways of thinking, feeling, and behaving. By contrast, psychopathology has traditionally been conceptualized in terms of <i>categories</i> of disorder - disordered thinking, feeling, and behaving. The empirical literature, however, routinely shows that psychopathology does not coalesce into readily distinguishable categories. Indeed, psychopathology tends to delineate dimensions that are relatively similar to dimensions of personality. In this special issue of <i>Personality Neuroscience</i>, authors took up the challenge of reconceptualizing personality and psychopathology in terms of connected and interrelated dimensions, and they considered the utility of pursuing neuroscientific inquiry from this more integrative perspective. In this editorial article, we provide the relevant background to the interface between personality, psychopathology, and neuroscience; summarize contributions to the special issue; and point toward directions for continued research and refinement. All told, it is evident that quantitatively derived, integrative models of personality-psychopathology represent a particularly promising conduit for advancing our understanding of the neurobiological foundation of human experience, both functional and dysfunctional.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36424,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personality Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"e4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ca/b7/S2513988621000031a.PMC8640674.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personality Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/pen.2021.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/pen.2021.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

传统上,人格的概念是指人类经验的各个层面--思维、情感和行为的习惯方式。相比之下,精神病理学传统上是从失调类别的角度进行概念化的--失调的思维、感觉和行为。然而,实证文献经常显示,精神病理学并没有凝聚成易于区分的类别。事实上,精神病理学倾向于划分出与人格维度相对相似的维度。在本期《人格神经科学》特刊中,作者们接受了从相互关联的维度重新认识人格和精神病理学的挑战,并考虑了从这一更具综合性的角度进行神经科学研究的效用。在这篇社论文章中,我们将介绍人格、精神病理学和神经科学之间联系的相关背景;总结对特刊的贡献;并指出继续研究和完善的方向。总而言之,很明显,人格-心理病理学的定量推导综合模型代表了一种特别有前途的渠道,可以促进我们对人类经验的神经生物学基础的理解,无论是功能性的还是功能失调性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Connecting quantitatively derived personality-psychopathology models and neuroscience.

Connecting quantitatively derived personality-psychopathology models and neuroscience.

Traditionally, personality has been conceptualized in terms of dimensions of human experience - habitual ways of thinking, feeling, and behaving. By contrast, psychopathology has traditionally been conceptualized in terms of categories of disorder - disordered thinking, feeling, and behaving. The empirical literature, however, routinely shows that psychopathology does not coalesce into readily distinguishable categories. Indeed, psychopathology tends to delineate dimensions that are relatively similar to dimensions of personality. In this special issue of Personality Neuroscience, authors took up the challenge of reconceptualizing personality and psychopathology in terms of connected and interrelated dimensions, and they considered the utility of pursuing neuroscientific inquiry from this more integrative perspective. In this editorial article, we provide the relevant background to the interface between personality, psychopathology, and neuroscience; summarize contributions to the special issue; and point toward directions for continued research and refinement. All told, it is evident that quantitatively derived, integrative models of personality-psychopathology represent a particularly promising conduit for advancing our understanding of the neurobiological foundation of human experience, both functional and dysfunctional.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Personality Neuroscience
Personality Neuroscience Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信