护理点超声波检查(POCUS)在诊断膝关节急性内侧半月板损伤中的作用。

IF 3.4 Q2 Medicine
Omid Ahmadi, Mehdi Motififard, Farhad Heydari, Keihan Golshani, Azita Azimi Meibody, Saeed Hatami
{"title":"护理点超声波检查(POCUS)在诊断膝关节急性内侧半月板损伤中的作用。","authors":"Omid Ahmadi, Mehdi Motififard, Farhad Heydari, Keihan Golshani, Azita Azimi Meibody, Saeed Hatami","doi":"10.1186/s13089-021-00256-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In recent years, musculoskeletal ultrasound has increasingly become the common method for diagnosis for many medical specialties. Therefore, the present study was performed to evaluate the diagnostic value of point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) as a primary triage tool in the diagnosis of the acute medial meniscus injury of the knee.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The present cross-sectional study was performed on patients with a suspected medial meniscus injury of the knee in the emergency department (ED). After history taking and primary physical examination, radiographic imaging of the knee was done. If there was no fracture in the knee X-ray, the POCUS examination on the knee was carried out. All the patients were asked to refer to an orthopedic clinic 2 weeks after discharge from ED for the Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) evaluation. Finally, the POCUS findings were compared with the MRI findings in diagnosing medial meniscus injury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-five patients with a mean age of 35.48 ± 11.58 years were analyzed in the study (69.1% male). In comparison with MRI scan, the sensitivity and specificity of POCUS in the detection of medial meniscus injury were 85.0 [95% confidence interval (CI), 54.0 to 98.9] and 65.7% [95% CI 42.2 to 85.7], respectively. Its positive and negative predictive values were 58.6% [95% CI 33.8 to 81.5] and 88.5% [95% CI 62.1 to 99.3], respectively. (Area under the ROC curve = 0.726, P value = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study demonstrated that POCUS can reasonably be applied in comparison with MRI to evaluate medial meniscus injury. POCUS is an effective initial diagnostic modality in patients with suspected medial meniscus injuries.</p>","PeriodicalId":36911,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound Journal","volume":" ","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8825915/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) in the diagnosing of acute medial meniscus injury of knee joint.\",\"authors\":\"Omid Ahmadi, Mehdi Motififard, Farhad Heydari, Keihan Golshani, Azita Azimi Meibody, Saeed Hatami\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13089-021-00256-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In recent years, musculoskeletal ultrasound has increasingly become the common method for diagnosis for many medical specialties. Therefore, the present study was performed to evaluate the diagnostic value of point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) as a primary triage tool in the diagnosis of the acute medial meniscus injury of the knee.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The present cross-sectional study was performed on patients with a suspected medial meniscus injury of the knee in the emergency department (ED). After history taking and primary physical examination, radiographic imaging of the knee was done. If there was no fracture in the knee X-ray, the POCUS examination on the knee was carried out. All the patients were asked to refer to an orthopedic clinic 2 weeks after discharge from ED for the Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) evaluation. Finally, the POCUS findings were compared with the MRI findings in diagnosing medial meniscus injury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-five patients with a mean age of 35.48 ± 11.58 years were analyzed in the study (69.1% male). In comparison with MRI scan, the sensitivity and specificity of POCUS in the detection of medial meniscus injury were 85.0 [95% confidence interval (CI), 54.0 to 98.9] and 65.7% [95% CI 42.2 to 85.7], respectively. Its positive and negative predictive values were 58.6% [95% CI 33.8 to 81.5] and 88.5% [95% CI 62.1 to 99.3], respectively. (Area under the ROC curve = 0.726, P value = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study demonstrated that POCUS can reasonably be applied in comparison with MRI to evaluate medial meniscus injury. POCUS is an effective initial diagnostic modality in patients with suspected medial meniscus injuries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ultrasound Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8825915/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ultrasound Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-021-00256-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-021-00256-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:近年来,肌肉骨骼超声越来越多地成为许多医学专业的常用诊断方法。因此,本研究旨在评估床旁超声检查(POCUS)作为诊断急性膝关节内侧半月板损伤的主要分诊工具的诊断价值:本横断面研究的对象是急诊科(ED)中疑似膝关节内侧半月板损伤的患者。在询问病史和初步体格检查后,对膝关节进行放射成像检查。如果膝关节 X 光片未发现骨折,则对膝关节进行 POCUS 检查。要求所有患者在急诊室出院两周后转诊至骨科诊所进行磁共振成像(MRI)评估。最后,在诊断内侧半月板损伤时,将 POCUS 结果与 MRI 结果进行比较:研究分析了 55 名患者(69.1% 为男性),平均年龄为(35.48 ± 11.58)岁。与核磁共振扫描相比,POCUS 检测内侧半月板损伤的敏感性和特异性分别为 85.0 [95% 置信区间 (CI),54.0 至 98.9] 和 65.7% [95% CI,42.2 至 85.7]。其阳性和阴性预测值分别为 58.6% [95% CI 33.8 至 81.5] 和 88.5% [95% CI 62.1 至 99.3]。(ROC曲线下面积=0.726,P值=0.003):本研究表明,与核磁共振成像相比,POCUS 可合理用于评估内侧半月板损伤。对于疑似内侧半月板损伤的患者,POCUS 是一种有效的初步诊断方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Role of point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) in the diagnosing of acute medial meniscus injury of knee joint.

Role of point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) in the diagnosing of acute medial meniscus injury of knee joint.

Role of point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) in the diagnosing of acute medial meniscus injury of knee joint.

Role of point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) in the diagnosing of acute medial meniscus injury of knee joint.

Background: In recent years, musculoskeletal ultrasound has increasingly become the common method for diagnosis for many medical specialties. Therefore, the present study was performed to evaluate the diagnostic value of point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) as a primary triage tool in the diagnosis of the acute medial meniscus injury of the knee.

Materials and methods: The present cross-sectional study was performed on patients with a suspected medial meniscus injury of the knee in the emergency department (ED). After history taking and primary physical examination, radiographic imaging of the knee was done. If there was no fracture in the knee X-ray, the POCUS examination on the knee was carried out. All the patients were asked to refer to an orthopedic clinic 2 weeks after discharge from ED for the Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) evaluation. Finally, the POCUS findings were compared with the MRI findings in diagnosing medial meniscus injury.

Results: Fifty-five patients with a mean age of 35.48 ± 11.58 years were analyzed in the study (69.1% male). In comparison with MRI scan, the sensitivity and specificity of POCUS in the detection of medial meniscus injury were 85.0 [95% confidence interval (CI), 54.0 to 98.9] and 65.7% [95% CI 42.2 to 85.7], respectively. Its positive and negative predictive values were 58.6% [95% CI 33.8 to 81.5] and 88.5% [95% CI 62.1 to 99.3], respectively. (Area under the ROC curve = 0.726, P value = 0.003).

Conclusion: The present study demonstrated that POCUS can reasonably be applied in comparison with MRI to evaluate medial meniscus injury. POCUS is an effective initial diagnostic modality in patients with suspected medial meniscus injuries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ultrasound Journal
Ultrasound Journal Health Professions-Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.90%
发文量
45
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信