老年人的健康专业姑息治疗教育:克服年龄歧视、种族主义和性别偏见。

IF 1.1 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Current Geriatrics Reports Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-10-30 DOI:10.1007/s13670-021-00365-7
Shena B Gazaway, Michael D Barnett, Ella H Bowman, Deborah Ejem, Erin R Harrell, Cynthia J Brown, Marie Bakitas
{"title":"老年人的健康专业姑息治疗教育:克服年龄歧视、种族主义和性别偏见。","authors":"Shena B Gazaway,&nbsp;Michael D Barnett,&nbsp;Ella H Bowman,&nbsp;Deborah Ejem,&nbsp;Erin R Harrell,&nbsp;Cynthia J Brown,&nbsp;Marie Bakitas","doi":"10.1007/s13670-021-00365-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Most aging Americans lack access to specialist palliative care aimed at those experiencing serious illness and/or high symptom burden at end of life. The curricula used by training programs for all healthcare professions should focus on helping learners develop the primary palliative care skills and competencies necessary to provide compassionate bias-free care for adults with serious illness. We believe there is much opportunity to improve this landscape via the incorporation of palliative care competencies throughout generalist healthcare professional programs.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Several recent publications highlight multiple issues with recruitment and retention of diverse students and faculty into healthcare professional training programs. There are also concerns that the curricula are reinforcing age, race, and gender biases. Due to these biases, healthcare professionals graduate from their training programs with socialized stereotypes unquestioned when caring for older adult minority patients and caregivers.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Important lessons must be incorporated to assure that bias against age, race, and gender are discovered and openly addressed in healthcare professional's education programs. This review highlights these three types of bias and their interrelationships with the aim of revealing hidden truths in the education of healthcare professionals. Ultimately, we offer targeted recommendations of focus for programs to address implicit bias within their curricula.</p>","PeriodicalId":38089,"journal":{"name":"Current Geriatrics Reports","volume":"10 4","pages":"148-156"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8556773/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health Professionals Palliative Care Education for Older Adults: Overcoming Ageism, Racism, and Gender Bias.\",\"authors\":\"Shena B Gazaway,&nbsp;Michael D Barnett,&nbsp;Ella H Bowman,&nbsp;Deborah Ejem,&nbsp;Erin R Harrell,&nbsp;Cynthia J Brown,&nbsp;Marie Bakitas\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13670-021-00365-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Most aging Americans lack access to specialist palliative care aimed at those experiencing serious illness and/or high symptom burden at end of life. The curricula used by training programs for all healthcare professions should focus on helping learners develop the primary palliative care skills and competencies necessary to provide compassionate bias-free care for adults with serious illness. We believe there is much opportunity to improve this landscape via the incorporation of palliative care competencies throughout generalist healthcare professional programs.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Several recent publications highlight multiple issues with recruitment and retention of diverse students and faculty into healthcare professional training programs. There are also concerns that the curricula are reinforcing age, race, and gender biases. Due to these biases, healthcare professionals graduate from their training programs with socialized stereotypes unquestioned when caring for older adult minority patients and caregivers.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Important lessons must be incorporated to assure that bias against age, race, and gender are discovered and openly addressed in healthcare professional's education programs. This review highlights these three types of bias and their interrelationships with the aim of revealing hidden truths in the education of healthcare professionals. Ultimately, we offer targeted recommendations of focus for programs to address implicit bias within their curricula.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Geriatrics Reports\",\"volume\":\"10 4\",\"pages\":\"148-156\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8556773/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Geriatrics Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13670-021-00365-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/10/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Geriatrics Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13670-021-00365-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

回顾的目的:大多数美国老年人缺乏针对那些在生命末期经历严重疾病和/或高症状负担的人的专科姑息治疗。所有医疗保健专业培训项目使用的课程应侧重于帮助学习者发展初级姑息治疗技能和能力,以便为患有严重疾病的成年人提供富有同情心的无偏见的护理。我们相信,通过将姑息治疗能力纳入全科医疗保健专业项目,有很多机会可以改善这种状况。最近的发现:最近的一些出版物强调了在医疗保健专业培训项目中招聘和保留不同学生和教师的多个问题。还有人担心,这些课程正在强化年龄、种族和性别偏见。由于这些偏见,医疗保健专业人员在照顾老年少数族裔患者和护理人员时,毫无疑问地从他们的培训项目中毕业,带有社会成见。总结:必须纳入重要的经验教训,以确保在医疗保健专业人员的教育计划中发现并公开解决对年龄、种族和性别的偏见。这篇综述强调了这三种类型的偏见及其相互关系,目的是揭示医疗保健专业人员教育中隐藏的真相。最后,我们为项目提供有针对性的重点建议,以解决课程中的隐性偏见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Health Professionals Palliative Care Education for Older Adults: Overcoming Ageism, Racism, and Gender Bias.

Health Professionals Palliative Care Education for Older Adults: Overcoming Ageism, Racism, and Gender Bias.

Purpose of review: Most aging Americans lack access to specialist palliative care aimed at those experiencing serious illness and/or high symptom burden at end of life. The curricula used by training programs for all healthcare professions should focus on helping learners develop the primary palliative care skills and competencies necessary to provide compassionate bias-free care for adults with serious illness. We believe there is much opportunity to improve this landscape via the incorporation of palliative care competencies throughout generalist healthcare professional programs.

Recent findings: Several recent publications highlight multiple issues with recruitment and retention of diverse students and faculty into healthcare professional training programs. There are also concerns that the curricula are reinforcing age, race, and gender biases. Due to these biases, healthcare professionals graduate from their training programs with socialized stereotypes unquestioned when caring for older adult minority patients and caregivers.

Summary: Important lessons must be incorporated to assure that bias against age, race, and gender are discovered and openly addressed in healthcare professional's education programs. This review highlights these three types of bias and their interrelationships with the aim of revealing hidden truths in the education of healthcare professionals. Ultimately, we offer targeted recommendations of focus for programs to address implicit bias within their curricula.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Geriatrics Reports
Current Geriatrics Reports Medicine-Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊介绍: This journal aims to offer in-depth review articles on the most recent innovative publications in geriatrics and gerontology. By providing clear, insightful contributions by international experts, the journal intends to serve clinicians and researchers involved in the diagnosis, management, treatment, prevention, and study of patients affected by age-related conditions. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as the age-related change in cognitive function, the influence of genetics on neurodegenerative disorders, and traumatic brain injury and dementia. Section Editors select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board of more than 20 members reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. We also provide commentaries from well-known figures in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信