ACGME里程碑能否预测外科专业委员会的通过:以妇产科为例。

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Sarah Ottum, Conrad Chao, Sejal Tamakuwala, Joshua Dean, Adib Shafi, Katherine Jennifer Kramer, Satinder Kaur, Maurice-Andre Recanati
{"title":"ACGME里程碑能否预测外科专业委员会的通过:以妇产科为例。","authors":"Sarah Ottum,&nbsp;Conrad Chao,&nbsp;Sejal Tamakuwala,&nbsp;Joshua Dean,&nbsp;Adib Shafi,&nbsp;Katherine Jennifer Kramer,&nbsp;Satinder Kaur,&nbsp;Maurice-Andre Recanati","doi":"10.31083/j.ceog4805168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multiple tools including Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) standardized milestones can be utilized to assess trainee and residency program performance. However, little is known regarding the objective validation of these tools in predicting written board passage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, data was gathered on n = 45 Wayne State University Obstetrics and Gynecology program graduates over the five-year period ending July 2018. United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) scores, Council on Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology (CREOG) in-training scores and ACGME milestones were used to predict American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ABOG) board passage success on first attempt. Significance was set at <i>p</i> < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Written board passage was associated with average CREOGs (<i>p</i> = 0.01) and milestones (<i>p</i> = 0.008) while USMLE1 was not significantly associated (<i>p</i> = 0.055). USMLE1 <217 (Positive predictive value (PPV) = 96%). CREOGs <197 (PPV = 100%) and milestones <3.25 (PPV = 100%), particularly practice-based learning and systems-based practice milestones were most strongly correlated with board failure. Using a combination of these two milestones, it is possible to correctly predict board passage using our model (PPV = 86%).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study is the first validating the utility of milestones in a surgical specialty by demonstrating their ability to predict board passage. Residents with CREOGs or milestones below thresholds are at risk for board failure and may warrant early intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":10312,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology","volume":"48 5","pages":"1048-1055"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8555913/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can ACGME Milestones predict surgical specialty board passage: an example in Obstetrics and Gynecology.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Ottum,&nbsp;Conrad Chao,&nbsp;Sejal Tamakuwala,&nbsp;Joshua Dean,&nbsp;Adib Shafi,&nbsp;Katherine Jennifer Kramer,&nbsp;Satinder Kaur,&nbsp;Maurice-Andre Recanati\",\"doi\":\"10.31083/j.ceog4805168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multiple tools including Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) standardized milestones can be utilized to assess trainee and residency program performance. However, little is known regarding the objective validation of these tools in predicting written board passage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, data was gathered on n = 45 Wayne State University Obstetrics and Gynecology program graduates over the five-year period ending July 2018. United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) scores, Council on Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology (CREOG) in-training scores and ACGME milestones were used to predict American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ABOG) board passage success on first attempt. Significance was set at <i>p</i> < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Written board passage was associated with average CREOGs (<i>p</i> = 0.01) and milestones (<i>p</i> = 0.008) while USMLE1 was not significantly associated (<i>p</i> = 0.055). USMLE1 <217 (Positive predictive value (PPV) = 96%). CREOGs <197 (PPV = 100%) and milestones <3.25 (PPV = 100%), particularly practice-based learning and systems-based practice milestones were most strongly correlated with board failure. Using a combination of these two milestones, it is possible to correctly predict board passage using our model (PPV = 86%).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study is the first validating the utility of milestones in a surgical specialty by demonstrating their ability to predict board passage. Residents with CREOGs or milestones below thresholds are at risk for board failure and may warrant early intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology\",\"volume\":\"48 5\",\"pages\":\"1048-1055\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8555913/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.ceog4805168\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.ceog4805168","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:包括研究生医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)标准化里程碑在内的多种工具可用于评估实习生和住院医师计划的绩效。然而,很少有人知道关于这些工具在预测书面董事会通过的客观验证。方法:在这项回顾性研究中,收集了截至2018年7月的五年期间n = 45名韦恩州立大学妇产科专业毕业生的数据。美国医师执照考试(USMLE)分数、妇产科住院医师教育委员会(CREOG)培训分数和ACGME里程碑被用来预测美国妇产科委员会(ABOG)第一次通过委员会的成功。p < 0.05为显著性。结果:书面板通过与平均CREOGs (p = 0.01)和里程碑(p = 0.008)相关,而USMLE1无显著相关性(p = 0.055)。USMLE1讨论:本研究首次通过证明里程碑预测董事会通过的能力,验证了里程碑在外科专业中的实用性。CREOGs或里程碑低于阈值的居民有董事会失败的风险,可能需要早期干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Can ACGME Milestones predict surgical specialty board passage: an example in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Can ACGME Milestones predict surgical specialty board passage: an example in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Can ACGME Milestones predict surgical specialty board passage: an example in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Can ACGME Milestones predict surgical specialty board passage: an example in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Background: Multiple tools including Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) standardized milestones can be utilized to assess trainee and residency program performance. However, little is known regarding the objective validation of these tools in predicting written board passage.

Methods: In this retrospective study, data was gathered on n = 45 Wayne State University Obstetrics and Gynecology program graduates over the five-year period ending July 2018. United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) scores, Council on Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology (CREOG) in-training scores and ACGME milestones were used to predict American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ABOG) board passage success on first attempt. Significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results: Written board passage was associated with average CREOGs (p = 0.01) and milestones (p = 0.008) while USMLE1 was not significantly associated (p = 0.055). USMLE1 <217 (Positive predictive value (PPV) = 96%). CREOGs <197 (PPV = 100%) and milestones <3.25 (PPV = 100%), particularly practice-based learning and systems-based practice milestones were most strongly correlated with board failure. Using a combination of these two milestones, it is possible to correctly predict board passage using our model (PPV = 86%).

Discussion: This study is the first validating the utility of milestones in a surgical specialty by demonstrating their ability to predict board passage. Residents with CREOGs or milestones below thresholds are at risk for board failure and may warrant early intervention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: CEOG is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal. CEOG covers all aspects of Obstetrics and Gynecology, including obstetrics, prenatal diagnosis, maternal-fetal medicine, perinatology, general gynecology, gynecologic oncology, uro-gynecology, reproductive medicine, infertility, reproductive endocrinology, sexual medicine. All submissions of cutting-edge advances of medical research in the area of women''s health worldwide are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信