Evgeny N Mikhaylov, Tamara A Lyubimtseva, Aleksandr D Vakhrushev, Dmitry Stepanov, Dmitry S Lebedev, Elena Yu Vasilieva, Alexandra O Konradi, Evgeny V Shlyakhto
{"title":"盐酸溴克辛预防医务人员COVID-19:一项随机开放标签研究","authors":"Evgeny N Mikhaylov, Tamara A Lyubimtseva, Aleksandr D Vakhrushev, Dmitry Stepanov, Dmitry S Lebedev, Elena Yu Vasilieva, Alexandra O Konradi, Evgeny V Shlyakhto","doi":"10.1155/2022/4693121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bromhexine hydrochloride has been suggested as a TMPRSS2 protease blocker that precludes the penetration of SARS-CoV-2 into cells. We aimed to assess the preventive potential of regular bromhexine hydrochloride intake for COVID-19 risk reduction in medical staff actively involved in the evaluation and treatment of patients with confirmed or suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a single-centre randomized open-label study, medical staff managing patients with suspected and confirmed COVID-19 were enrolled and followed up for 8 weeks. The study began at the initiation of COVID-19 management in the clinic. The study was prematurely terminated after the enrollment of 50 participants without a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection: 25 were assigned to bromhexine hydrochloride treatment (8 mg 3 times per day), and 25 were controls. The composite primary endpoint was a positive nasopharyngeal swab polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for SARS-CoV-2 or signs of clinical infection within 28 days and at week 8. Secondary endpoints included time from the first contact with a person with COVID-19 to the appearance of respiratory infection symptoms; the number of days before a first positive SARS-CoV-2 test; the number of asymptomatic participants with a positive nasopharyngeal swab test; the number of symptomatic COVID-19 cases; and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The rate of the combined primary endpoint did not differ significantly between the active treatment group (2/25 [8%]) and control group (7/25 [28%]); <i>P</i>=0.07. A fewer number of participants developed symptomatic COVID-19 in the treatment group compared to controls (0/25 vs. 5/25; <i>P</i>=0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the study was underpowered, it showed that Bromhexine hydrochloride prophylaxis was associated with a reduced rate of symptomatic COVID-19. The prophylactic treatment was not associated with a lower combined primary endpoint rate, a positive swab PCR test, or COVID-19 (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04405999).</p>","PeriodicalId":39128,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"4693121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8799951/pdf/","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bromhexine Hydrochloride Prophylaxis of COVID-19 for Medical Personnel: A Randomized Open-Label Study.\",\"authors\":\"Evgeny N Mikhaylov, Tamara A Lyubimtseva, Aleksandr D Vakhrushev, Dmitry Stepanov, Dmitry S Lebedev, Elena Yu Vasilieva, Alexandra O Konradi, Evgeny V Shlyakhto\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2022/4693121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bromhexine hydrochloride has been suggested as a TMPRSS2 protease blocker that precludes the penetration of SARS-CoV-2 into cells. We aimed to assess the preventive potential of regular bromhexine hydrochloride intake for COVID-19 risk reduction in medical staff actively involved in the evaluation and treatment of patients with confirmed or suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a single-centre randomized open-label study, medical staff managing patients with suspected and confirmed COVID-19 were enrolled and followed up for 8 weeks. The study began at the initiation of COVID-19 management in the clinic. The study was prematurely terminated after the enrollment of 50 participants without a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection: 25 were assigned to bromhexine hydrochloride treatment (8 mg 3 times per day), and 25 were controls. The composite primary endpoint was a positive nasopharyngeal swab polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for SARS-CoV-2 or signs of clinical infection within 28 days and at week 8. Secondary endpoints included time from the first contact with a person with COVID-19 to the appearance of respiratory infection symptoms; the number of days before a first positive SARS-CoV-2 test; the number of asymptomatic participants with a positive nasopharyngeal swab test; the number of symptomatic COVID-19 cases; and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The rate of the combined primary endpoint did not differ significantly between the active treatment group (2/25 [8%]) and control group (7/25 [28%]); <i>P</i>=0.07. A fewer number of participants developed symptomatic COVID-19 in the treatment group compared to controls (0/25 vs. 5/25; <i>P</i>=0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the study was underpowered, it showed that Bromhexine hydrochloride prophylaxis was associated with a reduced rate of symptomatic COVID-19. The prophylactic treatment was not associated with a lower combined primary endpoint rate, a positive swab PCR test, or COVID-19 (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04405999).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"4693121\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8799951/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4693121\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Immunology and Microbiology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4693121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Immunology and Microbiology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13
摘要
背景:盐酸溴己辛被认为是一种TMPRSS2蛋白酶阻滞剂,可以阻止SARS-CoV-2渗透到细胞中。我们旨在评估在积极参与确诊或疑似SARS-CoV-2感染患者的评估和治疗的医务人员中,定期摄入盐酸溴克辛对降低COVID-19风险的预防潜力。方法:采用单中心随机开放标签研究,招募管理COVID-19疑似和确诊患者的医务人员,随访8周。该研究始于临床COVID-19管理的开始。在50名没有SARS-CoV-2感染史的参与者入组后,该研究被提前终止:25名参与者被分配到盐酸溴甲辛治疗组(8mg,每天3次),25名作为对照组。复合主要终点是在28天和第8周内鼻咽拭子聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测中出现SARS-CoV-2阳性或临床感染迹象。次要终点包括从首次接触COVID-19患者到出现呼吸道感染症状的时间;第一次SARS-CoV-2检测呈阳性前的天数;鼻咽拭子试验阳性的无症状参与者人数;COVID-19有症状病例数;以及不良事件。结果:联合主要终点率在积极治疗组(2/25[8%])和对照组(7/25[28%])之间无显著差异;P = 0.07。与对照组相比,治疗组出现症状性COVID-19的参与者人数较少(0/25 vs 5/25;P = 0.02)。结论:虽然这项研究的力度不足,但它表明盐酸溴克辛预防与降低症状性COVID-19发生率相关。预防性治疗与较低的综合主要终点率、阳性拭子PCR检测或COVID-19 (ClinicalTrials.gov编号,NCT04405999)无关。
Bromhexine Hydrochloride Prophylaxis of COVID-19 for Medical Personnel: A Randomized Open-Label Study.
Background: Bromhexine hydrochloride has been suggested as a TMPRSS2 protease blocker that precludes the penetration of SARS-CoV-2 into cells. We aimed to assess the preventive potential of regular bromhexine hydrochloride intake for COVID-19 risk reduction in medical staff actively involved in the evaluation and treatment of patients with confirmed or suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Methods: In a single-centre randomized open-label study, medical staff managing patients with suspected and confirmed COVID-19 were enrolled and followed up for 8 weeks. The study began at the initiation of COVID-19 management in the clinic. The study was prematurely terminated after the enrollment of 50 participants without a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection: 25 were assigned to bromhexine hydrochloride treatment (8 mg 3 times per day), and 25 were controls. The composite primary endpoint was a positive nasopharyngeal swab polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for SARS-CoV-2 or signs of clinical infection within 28 days and at week 8. Secondary endpoints included time from the first contact with a person with COVID-19 to the appearance of respiratory infection symptoms; the number of days before a first positive SARS-CoV-2 test; the number of asymptomatic participants with a positive nasopharyngeal swab test; the number of symptomatic COVID-19 cases; and adverse events.
Results: The rate of the combined primary endpoint did not differ significantly between the active treatment group (2/25 [8%]) and control group (7/25 [28%]); P=0.07. A fewer number of participants developed symptomatic COVID-19 in the treatment group compared to controls (0/25 vs. 5/25; P=0.02).
Conclusion: Although the study was underpowered, it showed that Bromhexine hydrochloride prophylaxis was associated with a reduced rate of symptomatic COVID-19. The prophylactic treatment was not associated with a lower combined primary endpoint rate, a positive swab PCR test, or COVID-19 (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04405999).