高级别法氏囊侧肩袖修复:手术结果回顾。

IF 1.7 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopedic Research and Reviews Pub Date : 2021-10-11 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.2147/ORR.S323092
Renaldi Prasetia, Erica Kholinne, Prettysia Suvarly, Wendy Yolanda Rosa, Yuni Susanti Pratiwi, Herry Herman, Hermawan Nagar Rasyid, Bancha Chernchujit, Ronny Lesmana
{"title":"高级别法氏囊侧肩袖修复:手术结果回顾。","authors":"Renaldi Prasetia,&nbsp;Erica Kholinne,&nbsp;Prettysia Suvarly,&nbsp;Wendy Yolanda Rosa,&nbsp;Yuni Susanti Pratiwi,&nbsp;Herry Herman,&nbsp;Hermawan Nagar Rasyid,&nbsp;Bancha Chernchujit,&nbsp;Ronny Lesmana","doi":"10.2147/ORR.S323092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aimed to evaluate surgical outcomes of high-grade bursal rotator cuff-tear repairs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review was performed in May 2020 in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines using PubMed. Inclusion criteria were English-language studies reporting the results of pain improvement, functional outcome scores, and radiographic examinations after repair of bursal side partial rotator-cuff tears at any time point in patients of any age and with all levels of evidence. Exclusion criteria were articles not in English, in vitro or animal studies, epidemiological studies, and such article types as technical notes or narrative reviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 58 articles, five were included in this study, of which three and two had level III and IV evidence, respectively, four were comparative studies, and one was a case series. Visual analogue scales were used in four of the five studies, all showing improvement in pain assessment from 5.87 preoperatively to 1.02 postoperatively. All five studies showed significant improvement on each functional outcome score at the final follow-up. The retear rate for all studies was 10.97% (27 of 246).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High-grade bursal side partial-thickness rotator cuff-tear repair gave satisfactory results in terms of pain scores, range of motion, and functional outcomes. The retear rate was still considerably high (10.9%), necessitating better understanding of the basic science, such as molecular mechanisms during adaptation, to improve the surgical technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":19608,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedic Research and Reviews","volume":"13 ","pages":"179-186"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/bb/45/orr-13-179.PMC8524261.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High-Grade Bursal Side Rotator-Cuff Repair: A Surgical Outcome Review.\",\"authors\":\"Renaldi Prasetia,&nbsp;Erica Kholinne,&nbsp;Prettysia Suvarly,&nbsp;Wendy Yolanda Rosa,&nbsp;Yuni Susanti Pratiwi,&nbsp;Herry Herman,&nbsp;Hermawan Nagar Rasyid,&nbsp;Bancha Chernchujit,&nbsp;Ronny Lesmana\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/ORR.S323092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aimed to evaluate surgical outcomes of high-grade bursal rotator cuff-tear repairs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review was performed in May 2020 in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines using PubMed. Inclusion criteria were English-language studies reporting the results of pain improvement, functional outcome scores, and radiographic examinations after repair of bursal side partial rotator-cuff tears at any time point in patients of any age and with all levels of evidence. Exclusion criteria were articles not in English, in vitro or animal studies, epidemiological studies, and such article types as technical notes or narrative reviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 58 articles, five were included in this study, of which three and two had level III and IV evidence, respectively, four were comparative studies, and one was a case series. Visual analogue scales were used in four of the five studies, all showing improvement in pain assessment from 5.87 preoperatively to 1.02 postoperatively. All five studies showed significant improvement on each functional outcome score at the final follow-up. The retear rate for all studies was 10.97% (27 of 246).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High-grade bursal side partial-thickness rotator cuff-tear repair gave satisfactory results in terms of pain scores, range of motion, and functional outcomes. The retear rate was still considerably high (10.9%), necessitating better understanding of the basic science, such as molecular mechanisms during adaptation, to improve the surgical technique.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19608,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopedic Research and Reviews\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"179-186\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/bb/45/orr-13-179.PMC8524261.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopedic Research and Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/ORR.S323092\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopedic Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/ORR.S323092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

目的:我们的目的是评估高级别法氏囊肩袖撕裂修复的手术效果。方法:本系统评价于2020年5月根据PubMed系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目进行。纳入标准是报告任何年龄、所有证据水平的患者在任何时间点的法囊侧部分肩袖撕裂修复后疼痛改善、功能结局评分和影像学检查结果的英语研究。排除标准为非英文文章、体外或动物研究、流行病学研究以及技术说明或叙述性评论等文章类型。结果:本研究共纳入58篇文献5篇,其中3篇为III级证据,2篇为IV级证据,4篇为比较研究,1篇为病例系列。五项研究中有四项使用视觉模拟量表,均显示疼痛评估从术前的5.87分改善到术后的1.02分。在最后的随访中,所有五项研究都显示了每个功能结果评分的显著改善。所有研究的回顾率为10.97%(246项研究中有27项)。结论:高级别法氏囊侧部分厚度肩袖撕裂修复在疼痛评分、活动范围和功能结果方面取得了令人满意的结果。复发率仍然相当高(10.9%),需要更好地了解适应过程中的分子机制等基础科学,以改进手术技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

High-Grade Bursal Side Rotator-Cuff Repair: A Surgical Outcome Review.

High-Grade Bursal Side Rotator-Cuff Repair: A Surgical Outcome Review.

Purpose: We aimed to evaluate surgical outcomes of high-grade bursal rotator cuff-tear repairs.

Methods: This systematic review was performed in May 2020 in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines using PubMed. Inclusion criteria were English-language studies reporting the results of pain improvement, functional outcome scores, and radiographic examinations after repair of bursal side partial rotator-cuff tears at any time point in patients of any age and with all levels of evidence. Exclusion criteria were articles not in English, in vitro or animal studies, epidemiological studies, and such article types as technical notes or narrative reviews.

Results: Of 58 articles, five were included in this study, of which three and two had level III and IV evidence, respectively, four were comparative studies, and one was a case series. Visual analogue scales were used in four of the five studies, all showing improvement in pain assessment from 5.87 preoperatively to 1.02 postoperatively. All five studies showed significant improvement on each functional outcome score at the final follow-up. The retear rate for all studies was 10.97% (27 of 246).

Conclusion: High-grade bursal side partial-thickness rotator cuff-tear repair gave satisfactory results in terms of pain scores, range of motion, and functional outcomes. The retear rate was still considerably high (10.9%), necessitating better understanding of the basic science, such as molecular mechanisms during adaptation, to improve the surgical technique.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopedic Research and Reviews
Orthopedic Research and Reviews Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopedic Research and Reviews is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal focusing on the patho-physiology of the musculoskeletal system, trauma, surgery and other corrective interventions to restore mobility and function. Advances in new technologies, materials, techniques and pharmacological agents will be particularly welcome. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Patho-physiology and bioengineering, Technologies and materials science, Surgical techniques, including robotics, Trauma management and care, Treatment including pharmacological and non-pharmacological, Rehabilitation and Multidisciplinarian care approaches, Patient quality of life, satisfaction and preference, Health economic evaluations. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, basic science and technology, clinical studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, case reports and extended reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信