系统性免疫炎症指数(SII)与孤立性冠状动脉扩张的关系。

Aydın Rodi Tosu, Halil İbrahim Biter
{"title":"系统性免疫炎症指数(SII)与孤立性冠状动脉扩张的关系。","authors":"Aydın Rodi Tosu,&nbsp;Halil İbrahim Biter","doi":"10.5114/amsad.2021.109253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) has been developed based on the calculation of N×P/L (N, P and L represent neutrophil count, platelet count and lymphocyte count, respectively), and it is widely used as a marker of inflammation and an indicator of cardiovascular outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease. We examined a possible association between SII and the presence of isolated coronary artery ectasia (CAE).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In this retrospective case-control study, a total of 4400 patients who underwent elective coronary angiography between June 2015 and July 2020 were retrospectively screened. Following the application of exclusion criteria, our study population consisted of 139 CAE patients and 141 age- and gender-matched subjects who proved to have normal coronary angiograms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median value of SII was found to be statistically significantly higher in patients with CAE (<i>p</i> < 0.01). SII level ≥ 809 measured on admission had 48% sensitivity and 82% specificity in predicting isolated CAE in ROC curve analysis. In this ROC analysis, the predictive powers of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and SII in determining the presence of ectasia were compared, and the predictive power of SII was significantly stronger than N/L ratio (<i>p</i> = 0.003). In the multivariate analysis, hyperlipidaemia (OR = 1.978, 95% CI: 1.168-3.349, <i>p</i> = 0.01), smoking (OR = 1.86, 95% CI: 1.090-3.127, <i>p</i> = 0.023) N/L ratio (OR = 1.192, 95% CI: (1.114-1.997, <i>p</i> = 0.07) and SII (OR = 1.002, 95% CI: 1.001-1.003, <i>p</i> < 0.01) were independent predictors of the presence of isolated CAE.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SII is a readily available clinical laboratory value that is associated with the presence of isolated CAE. Our findings may indicate a common pathophysiological mechanism between CAE and coronary artery disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":8317,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Medical Sciences. Atherosclerotic Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f0/f8/AMS-AD-6-45194.PMC8525247.pdf","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) with presence of isolated coronary artery ectasia.\",\"authors\":\"Aydın Rodi Tosu,&nbsp;Halil İbrahim Biter\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/amsad.2021.109253\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) has been developed based on the calculation of N×P/L (N, P and L represent neutrophil count, platelet count and lymphocyte count, respectively), and it is widely used as a marker of inflammation and an indicator of cardiovascular outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease. We examined a possible association between SII and the presence of isolated coronary artery ectasia (CAE).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In this retrospective case-control study, a total of 4400 patients who underwent elective coronary angiography between June 2015 and July 2020 were retrospectively screened. Following the application of exclusion criteria, our study population consisted of 139 CAE patients and 141 age- and gender-matched subjects who proved to have normal coronary angiograms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median value of SII was found to be statistically significantly higher in patients with CAE (<i>p</i> < 0.01). SII level ≥ 809 measured on admission had 48% sensitivity and 82% specificity in predicting isolated CAE in ROC curve analysis. In this ROC analysis, the predictive powers of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and SII in determining the presence of ectasia were compared, and the predictive power of SII was significantly stronger than N/L ratio (<i>p</i> = 0.003). In the multivariate analysis, hyperlipidaemia (OR = 1.978, 95% CI: 1.168-3.349, <i>p</i> = 0.01), smoking (OR = 1.86, 95% CI: 1.090-3.127, <i>p</i> = 0.023) N/L ratio (OR = 1.192, 95% CI: (1.114-1.997, <i>p</i> = 0.07) and SII (OR = 1.002, 95% CI: 1.001-1.003, <i>p</i> < 0.01) were independent predictors of the presence of isolated CAE.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SII is a readily available clinical laboratory value that is associated with the presence of isolated CAE. Our findings may indicate a common pathophysiological mechanism between CAE and coronary artery disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Medical Sciences. Atherosclerotic Diseases\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f0/f8/AMS-AD-6-45194.PMC8525247.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Medical Sciences. Atherosclerotic Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/amsad.2021.109253\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Medical Sciences. Atherosclerotic Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/amsad.2021.109253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

系统性免疫炎症指数(SII)是通过计算N×P/L (N、P和L分别代表中性粒细胞计数、血小板计数和淋巴细胞计数)而发展起来的,被广泛用作冠状动脉疾病患者炎症的标志物和心血管结局的指标。我们研究了SII与孤立性冠状动脉扩张(CAE)之间的可能关联。材料和方法:在这项回顾性病例对照研究中,回顾性筛选了2015年6月至2020年7月期间接受择期冠状动脉造影的4400例患者。根据排除标准的应用,我们的研究人群包括139例CAE患者和141例年龄和性别匹配的冠状动脉造影正常的受试者。结果:CAE组SII中位值明显高于CAE组(p < 0.01)。在ROC曲线分析中,入院时SII水平≥809预测孤立CAE的敏感性为48%,特异性为82%。在本ROC分析中,比较中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)和SII对是否存在扩张的预测能力,SII的预测能力明显强于N/L比值(p = 0.003)。在多因素分析中,高脂血症(OR = 1.978, 95% CI: 1.168 ~ 3.349, p = 0.01)、吸烟(OR = 1.86, 95% CI: 1.090 ~ 3.127, p = 0.023) N/L比(OR = 1.192, 95% CI: 1.114 ~ 1.997, p = 0.07)和SII (OR = 1.002, 95% CI: 1.001 ~ 1.003, p < 0.01)是孤立CAE存在的独立预测因子。结论:SII是一个容易获得的临床实验室值,与孤立CAE的存在有关。我们的研究结果可能表明CAE与冠状动脉疾病之间存在共同的病理生理机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Association of systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) with presence of isolated coronary artery ectasia.

Association of systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) with presence of isolated coronary artery ectasia.

Introduction: The systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) has been developed based on the calculation of N×P/L (N, P and L represent neutrophil count, platelet count and lymphocyte count, respectively), and it is widely used as a marker of inflammation and an indicator of cardiovascular outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease. We examined a possible association between SII and the presence of isolated coronary artery ectasia (CAE).

Material and methods: In this retrospective case-control study, a total of 4400 patients who underwent elective coronary angiography between June 2015 and July 2020 were retrospectively screened. Following the application of exclusion criteria, our study population consisted of 139 CAE patients and 141 age- and gender-matched subjects who proved to have normal coronary angiograms.

Results: The median value of SII was found to be statistically significantly higher in patients with CAE (p < 0.01). SII level ≥ 809 measured on admission had 48% sensitivity and 82% specificity in predicting isolated CAE in ROC curve analysis. In this ROC analysis, the predictive powers of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and SII in determining the presence of ectasia were compared, and the predictive power of SII was significantly stronger than N/L ratio (p = 0.003). In the multivariate analysis, hyperlipidaemia (OR = 1.978, 95% CI: 1.168-3.349, p = 0.01), smoking (OR = 1.86, 95% CI: 1.090-3.127, p = 0.023) N/L ratio (OR = 1.192, 95% CI: (1.114-1.997, p = 0.07) and SII (OR = 1.002, 95% CI: 1.001-1.003, p < 0.01) were independent predictors of the presence of isolated CAE.

Conclusions: SII is a readily available clinical laboratory value that is associated with the presence of isolated CAE. Our findings may indicate a common pathophysiological mechanism between CAE and coronary artery disease.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信