Janne Angen Indergård, Anneli Skjold, Christian Schriwer, Marit Øilo
{"title":"胶结技术对整体氧化锆冠断裂载荷的影响。","authors":"Janne Angen Indergård, Anneli Skjold, Christian Schriwer, Marit Øilo","doi":"10.1080/26415275.2021.1990764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of cement on the fracture load of monolithic zirconia crowns with different yttria content (3 and 5 mol%).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 62 monolithic zirconia crowns, 40 3Y-zirconia crowns (Prettau<sup>®</sup> Zirconia, Zirkonzahn) and 22 5Y-zirconia crowns (Prettau<sup>®</sup> 4 Anterior<sup>®</sup>, Zirkonzahn) were produced to a shallow chamfer molar preparation. The 3Y-crowns were divided into four groups and attached to composite abutment duplicates (SDR<sup>®</sup> flow+, Dentsply DeTrey GmbH) using the following four cementation techniques; (1) Self-adhesive resin-based cement, (2) Pre-treatment with air-abrasion and self-adhesive resin-based cement, (3) Zinc phosphate cement, (4) Glass-ionomer cement. The 5Y-crowns were divided into two groups and attached to the duplicates with; (1) Self-adhesive resin-based cement, or (2) Air-abrasion pre-treatment and self-adhesive resin-based cement. All crowns were loaded axially (0.5 mm/min) on the occlusal surface until fracture occurred.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 3Y-zirconia groups, the zinc phosphate cement group fractured at lower loads compared to the resin-based cement groups, with and without air-abrasion, (<i>p</i> < .012). Among the 5Y-groups the air-abraded crowns fractured at statistically significant lower loads compared to the untreated crowns (<i>p</i> < .028). Load at fracture values were significantly different between the two zirconia materials (<i>p</i> < .001), with fracture loads ranging from 3873 to 7500 N in the 3Y-groups, and 2100 to 4948 N in the 5Y-groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Resin-based cementation increased the fracture load compared to non-adhesive cementation. The 3Y-crowns fractured at almost twice the loads of the 5Y-crowns. Pre-treatment with air abrasion reduced the strength of the 5Y-crowns only, showing the importance of differentiating the treatment of the two materials.</p>","PeriodicalId":72378,"journal":{"name":"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"160-169"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8530494/pdf/","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of cementation techniques on fracture load of monolithic zirconia crowns.\",\"authors\":\"Janne Angen Indergård, Anneli Skjold, Christian Schriwer, Marit Øilo\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/26415275.2021.1990764\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of cement on the fracture load of monolithic zirconia crowns with different yttria content (3 and 5 mol%).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 62 monolithic zirconia crowns, 40 3Y-zirconia crowns (Prettau<sup>®</sup> Zirconia, Zirkonzahn) and 22 5Y-zirconia crowns (Prettau<sup>®</sup> 4 Anterior<sup>®</sup>, Zirkonzahn) were produced to a shallow chamfer molar preparation. The 3Y-crowns were divided into four groups and attached to composite abutment duplicates (SDR<sup>®</sup> flow+, Dentsply DeTrey GmbH) using the following four cementation techniques; (1) Self-adhesive resin-based cement, (2) Pre-treatment with air-abrasion and self-adhesive resin-based cement, (3) Zinc phosphate cement, (4) Glass-ionomer cement. The 5Y-crowns were divided into two groups and attached to the duplicates with; (1) Self-adhesive resin-based cement, or (2) Air-abrasion pre-treatment and self-adhesive resin-based cement. All crowns were loaded axially (0.5 mm/min) on the occlusal surface until fracture occurred.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 3Y-zirconia groups, the zinc phosphate cement group fractured at lower loads compared to the resin-based cement groups, with and without air-abrasion, (<i>p</i> < .012). Among the 5Y-groups the air-abraded crowns fractured at statistically significant lower loads compared to the untreated crowns (<i>p</i> < .028). Load at fracture values were significantly different between the two zirconia materials (<i>p</i> < .001), with fracture loads ranging from 3873 to 7500 N in the 3Y-groups, and 2100 to 4948 N in the 5Y-groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Resin-based cementation increased the fracture load compared to non-adhesive cementation. The 3Y-crowns fractured at almost twice the loads of the 5Y-crowns. Pre-treatment with air abrasion reduced the strength of the 5Y-crowns only, showing the importance of differentiating the treatment of the two materials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"160-169\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8530494/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2021.1990764\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2021.1990764","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effect of cementation techniques on fracture load of monolithic zirconia crowns.
Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of cement on the fracture load of monolithic zirconia crowns with different yttria content (3 and 5 mol%).
Methods: A total of 62 monolithic zirconia crowns, 40 3Y-zirconia crowns (Prettau® Zirconia, Zirkonzahn) and 22 5Y-zirconia crowns (Prettau® 4 Anterior®, Zirkonzahn) were produced to a shallow chamfer molar preparation. The 3Y-crowns were divided into four groups and attached to composite abutment duplicates (SDR® flow+, Dentsply DeTrey GmbH) using the following four cementation techniques; (1) Self-adhesive resin-based cement, (2) Pre-treatment with air-abrasion and self-adhesive resin-based cement, (3) Zinc phosphate cement, (4) Glass-ionomer cement. The 5Y-crowns were divided into two groups and attached to the duplicates with; (1) Self-adhesive resin-based cement, or (2) Air-abrasion pre-treatment and self-adhesive resin-based cement. All crowns were loaded axially (0.5 mm/min) on the occlusal surface until fracture occurred.
Results: Among the 3Y-zirconia groups, the zinc phosphate cement group fractured at lower loads compared to the resin-based cement groups, with and without air-abrasion, (p < .012). Among the 5Y-groups the air-abraded crowns fractured at statistically significant lower loads compared to the untreated crowns (p < .028). Load at fracture values were significantly different between the two zirconia materials (p < .001), with fracture loads ranging from 3873 to 7500 N in the 3Y-groups, and 2100 to 4948 N in the 5Y-groups.
Conclusions: Resin-based cementation increased the fracture load compared to non-adhesive cementation. The 3Y-crowns fractured at almost twice the loads of the 5Y-crowns. Pre-treatment with air abrasion reduced the strength of the 5Y-crowns only, showing the importance of differentiating the treatment of the two materials.