颈椎病筛查自我管理问卷的开发。第二部分,外科病例的特点调查。

IF 0.7 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Fukushima Journal of Medical Science Pub Date : 2021-12-21 Epub Date: 2021-10-12 DOI:10.5387/fms.2021-03
Hiroshi Kobayashi, Koji Otani, Junichi Handa, Kinshi Kato, Kazuyuki Watanabe, Takuya Nikaido, Shoji Yabuki, Shin-Ichi Konno
{"title":"颈椎病筛查自我管理问卷的开发。第二部分,外科病例的特点调查。","authors":"Hiroshi Kobayashi,&nbsp;Koji Otani,&nbsp;Junichi Handa,&nbsp;Kinshi Kato,&nbsp;Kazuyuki Watanabe,&nbsp;Takuya Nikaido,&nbsp;Shoji Yabuki,&nbsp;Shin-Ichi Konno","doi":"10.5387/fms.2021-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Our previous report described the development of a self-administered questionnaire to screen patients for cervical myelopathy (SQC). For clinical application, the characteristics of the SQC should be verified.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants comprised 129 patients (94 men, 35 women) with cervical myelopathy who underwent operative treatment. SQC score was calculated before surgery and patients were divided into a positive group (score ≥6) and negative group (score <6). Sex, age, pathologies of cervical myelopathy, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, 10-s grip-and-release test (10-s test), grip strength, number of levels decompressed, most cranial level of damage, and presence of diabetes mellitus (DM) were compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sensitivity was 89.9% with 116 positive cases and 13 negative cases (10.1%). JOA score was significantly higher and 10-s test and grip strength significantly better in the negative group than in the positive group. No significant differences in sex, age, pathologies of cervical myelopathy, number of spinal levels decompressed, most rostral level of damage, or presence of DM were seen between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Screening for cervical myelopathy using SQC had a high sensitivity of 89.9%. However, SQC should be used with caution because it may miss mild cervical myelopathy with low JOA scores.</p>","PeriodicalId":44831,"journal":{"name":"Fukushima Journal of Medical Science","volume":"67 3","pages":"102-106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/98/54/2185-4610-67-102.PMC8784193.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a self-administered questionnaire for the screening of cervical myelopathy. Part 2, investigation of its characteristics in surgical cases.\",\"authors\":\"Hiroshi Kobayashi,&nbsp;Koji Otani,&nbsp;Junichi Handa,&nbsp;Kinshi Kato,&nbsp;Kazuyuki Watanabe,&nbsp;Takuya Nikaido,&nbsp;Shoji Yabuki,&nbsp;Shin-Ichi Konno\",\"doi\":\"10.5387/fms.2021-03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Our previous report described the development of a self-administered questionnaire to screen patients for cervical myelopathy (SQC). For clinical application, the characteristics of the SQC should be verified.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants comprised 129 patients (94 men, 35 women) with cervical myelopathy who underwent operative treatment. SQC score was calculated before surgery and patients were divided into a positive group (score ≥6) and negative group (score <6). Sex, age, pathologies of cervical myelopathy, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, 10-s grip-and-release test (10-s test), grip strength, number of levels decompressed, most cranial level of damage, and presence of diabetes mellitus (DM) were compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sensitivity was 89.9% with 116 positive cases and 13 negative cases (10.1%). JOA score was significantly higher and 10-s test and grip strength significantly better in the negative group than in the positive group. No significant differences in sex, age, pathologies of cervical myelopathy, number of spinal levels decompressed, most rostral level of damage, or presence of DM were seen between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Screening for cervical myelopathy using SQC had a high sensitivity of 89.9%. However, SQC should be used with caution because it may miss mild cervical myelopathy with low JOA scores.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44831,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fukushima Journal of Medical Science\",\"volume\":\"67 3\",\"pages\":\"102-106\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/98/54/2185-4610-67-102.PMC8784193.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fukushima Journal of Medical Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5387/fms.2021-03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/10/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fukushima Journal of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5387/fms.2021-03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:我们之前的报告描述了一种自我管理问卷的发展,以筛查颈髓病(SQC)患者。为了临床应用,应验证SQC的特征。方法:参与者包括129例接受手术治疗的颈髓病患者(94男,35女)。术前计算SQC评分,将患者分为阳性组(评分≥6)和阴性组(评分)结果:敏感性为89.9%,阳性116例,阴性13例(10.1%)。阴性组JOA评分显著高于阳性组,10-s测试和握力显著优于阳性组。在性别、年龄、颈椎病病理、脊柱减压水平的数量、大部分吻侧损伤水平或DM的存在方面,两组之间没有显著差异。结论:使用SQC筛查脊髓型颈椎病具有89.9%的高灵敏度。然而,SQC应谨慎使用,因为它可能会遗漏JOA评分较低的轻度颈脊髓病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Development of a self-administered questionnaire for the screening of cervical myelopathy. Part 2, investigation of its characteristics in surgical cases.

Development of a self-administered questionnaire for the screening of cervical myelopathy. Part 2, investigation of its characteristics in surgical cases.

Development of a self-administered questionnaire for the screening of cervical myelopathy. Part 2, investigation of its characteristics in surgical cases.

Background: Our previous report described the development of a self-administered questionnaire to screen patients for cervical myelopathy (SQC). For clinical application, the characteristics of the SQC should be verified.

Methods: Participants comprised 129 patients (94 men, 35 women) with cervical myelopathy who underwent operative treatment. SQC score was calculated before surgery and patients were divided into a positive group (score ≥6) and negative group (score <6). Sex, age, pathologies of cervical myelopathy, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, 10-s grip-and-release test (10-s test), grip strength, number of levels decompressed, most cranial level of damage, and presence of diabetes mellitus (DM) were compared between groups.

Results: The sensitivity was 89.9% with 116 positive cases and 13 negative cases (10.1%). JOA score was significantly higher and 10-s test and grip strength significantly better in the negative group than in the positive group. No significant differences in sex, age, pathologies of cervical myelopathy, number of spinal levels decompressed, most rostral level of damage, or presence of DM were seen between groups.

Conclusions: Screening for cervical myelopathy using SQC had a high sensitivity of 89.9%. However, SQC should be used with caution because it may miss mild cervical myelopathy with low JOA scores.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fukushima Journal of Medical Science
Fukushima Journal of Medical Science MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信