α -硫辛酸口服补充剂减轻不明病因疼痛的安全性和有效性:一项单中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验

IF 6.9 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Cristina Esposito , Emanuele Ugo Garzarella , Cristina Santarcangelo , Alessandro Di Minno , Marco Dacrema , Roberto Sacchi , Gaetano Piccinocchi , Roberto Piccinocchi , Maria Daglia
{"title":"α -硫辛酸口服补充剂减轻不明病因疼痛的安全性和有效性:一项单中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验","authors":"Cristina Esposito ,&nbsp;Emanuele Ugo Garzarella ,&nbsp;Cristina Santarcangelo ,&nbsp;Alessandro Di Minno ,&nbsp;Marco Dacrema ,&nbsp;Roberto Sacchi ,&nbsp;Gaetano Piccinocchi ,&nbsp;Roberto Piccinocchi ,&nbsp;Maria Daglia","doi":"10.1016/j.biopha.2021.112308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Extensive evidence suggests that alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) is effective in diabetic neuropathy pain management. However, little is known on its safety and efficacy in reducing idiopathic pain in normoglycemic subjects. The aim of this study was to evaluate ALA food supplement safety and efficacy in the reduction of different forms of idiopathic pain.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Two-hundred and ten normoglycemic adults suffering from idiopathic pain (i.e. 57 subjects with primitive neuropathic pain, 141 subjects with arthralgia with unknown etiology, and 12 subjects with idiopathic myalgia) were randomized to receive placebo, 400 mg/day, or 800 mg/day of ALA. Participants underwent two visits (at baseline = t0, and after 2 months = t1) in which two validated questionaries for pain (numerical rating scale [NRS] and visual analogue scale [VAS]) were collected; fasting blood glucose assessment, adverse effects, and renal and hepatic toxicity were also monitored.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>At t1, none of subjects treated with ALA reported a decreased glycemia or adverse effects. The treated subjects showed a significant reduction in NRS <strong>(</strong>p &lt; 0.001) while the placebo group did not show any NRS reduction (p = 0.86). Similar results were also obtained for VAS. Statistical analysis aimed at detecting possible differences in NRS and VAS scores among treatment groups based on the source of pain did not reveal any significant effect.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Since the management of idiopathic pain is challenging for physicians, the use of ALA food supplements could be a feasible option, based on its safety and efficacy compared to commonly-used analgesic drugs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8966,"journal":{"name":"Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy","volume":"144 ","pages":"Article 112308"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0753332221010921/pdfft?md5=a9a6afada614805ebfc70948bc624b70&pid=1-s2.0-S0753332221010921-main.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and efficacy of alpha-lipoic acid oral supplementation in the reduction of pain with unknown etiology: A monocentric, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial\",\"authors\":\"Cristina Esposito ,&nbsp;Emanuele Ugo Garzarella ,&nbsp;Cristina Santarcangelo ,&nbsp;Alessandro Di Minno ,&nbsp;Marco Dacrema ,&nbsp;Roberto Sacchi ,&nbsp;Gaetano Piccinocchi ,&nbsp;Roberto Piccinocchi ,&nbsp;Maria Daglia\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.biopha.2021.112308\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Extensive evidence suggests that alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) is effective in diabetic neuropathy pain management. However, little is known on its safety and efficacy in reducing idiopathic pain in normoglycemic subjects. The aim of this study was to evaluate ALA food supplement safety and efficacy in the reduction of different forms of idiopathic pain.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Two-hundred and ten normoglycemic adults suffering from idiopathic pain (i.e. 57 subjects with primitive neuropathic pain, 141 subjects with arthralgia with unknown etiology, and 12 subjects with idiopathic myalgia) were randomized to receive placebo, 400 mg/day, or 800 mg/day of ALA. Participants underwent two visits (at baseline = t0, and after 2 months = t1) in which two validated questionaries for pain (numerical rating scale [NRS] and visual analogue scale [VAS]) were collected; fasting blood glucose assessment, adverse effects, and renal and hepatic toxicity were also monitored.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>At t1, none of subjects treated with ALA reported a decreased glycemia or adverse effects. The treated subjects showed a significant reduction in NRS <strong>(</strong>p &lt; 0.001) while the placebo group did not show any NRS reduction (p = 0.86). Similar results were also obtained for VAS. Statistical analysis aimed at detecting possible differences in NRS and VAS scores among treatment groups based on the source of pain did not reveal any significant effect.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Since the management of idiopathic pain is challenging for physicians, the use of ALA food supplements could be a feasible option, based on its safety and efficacy compared to commonly-used analgesic drugs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy\",\"volume\":\"144 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112308\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0753332221010921/pdfft?md5=a9a6afada614805ebfc70948bc624b70&pid=1-s2.0-S0753332221010921-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0753332221010921\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0753332221010921","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

大量证据表明α -硫辛酸(ALA)在糖尿病神经病变疼痛管理中有效。然而,其在减轻血糖正常受试者特发性疼痛方面的安全性和有效性尚不清楚。本研究的目的是评估ALA食品补充剂在减少不同形式的特发性疼痛方面的安全性和有效性。方法将210名患有特发性疼痛的血糖正常的成年人(57名原发神经性疼痛,141名病因不明的关节痛,12名特发性肌痛)随机分为安慰剂组、400 mg/d组和800 mg/d组。参与者接受了两次访问(基线= t0, 2个月后= t1),其中收集了两份有效的疼痛问卷(数值评定量表[NRS]和视觉模拟量表[VAS]);空腹血糖评估、不良反应以及肾和肝毒性也被监测。结果在t1中,所有接受ALA治疗的受试者均未报告血糖下降或不良反应。治疗组的NRS显著降低(p <0.001),而安慰剂组没有显示任何NRS降低(p = 0.86)。VAS也得到了类似的结果。统计分析旨在检测NRS和VAS评分在治疗组之间基于疼痛来源的可能差异,未显示任何显着影响。由于特发性疼痛的治疗对医生来说具有挑战性,与常用镇痛药物相比,基于其安全性和有效性,使用ALA食品补充剂可能是一种可行的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety and efficacy of alpha-lipoic acid oral supplementation in the reduction of pain with unknown etiology: A monocentric, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial

Introduction

Extensive evidence suggests that alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) is effective in diabetic neuropathy pain management. However, little is known on its safety and efficacy in reducing idiopathic pain in normoglycemic subjects. The aim of this study was to evaluate ALA food supplement safety and efficacy in the reduction of different forms of idiopathic pain.

Methods

Two-hundred and ten normoglycemic adults suffering from idiopathic pain (i.e. 57 subjects with primitive neuropathic pain, 141 subjects with arthralgia with unknown etiology, and 12 subjects with idiopathic myalgia) were randomized to receive placebo, 400 mg/day, or 800 mg/day of ALA. Participants underwent two visits (at baseline = t0, and after 2 months = t1) in which two validated questionaries for pain (numerical rating scale [NRS] and visual analogue scale [VAS]) were collected; fasting blood glucose assessment, adverse effects, and renal and hepatic toxicity were also monitored.

Results

At t1, none of subjects treated with ALA reported a decreased glycemia or adverse effects. The treated subjects showed a significant reduction in NRS (p < 0.001) while the placebo group did not show any NRS reduction (p = 0.86). Similar results were also obtained for VAS. Statistical analysis aimed at detecting possible differences in NRS and VAS scores among treatment groups based on the source of pain did not reveal any significant effect.

Conclusions

Since the management of idiopathic pain is challenging for physicians, the use of ALA food supplements could be a feasible option, based on its safety and efficacy compared to commonly-used analgesic drugs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
2.70%
发文量
1621
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy stands as a multidisciplinary journal, presenting a spectrum of original research reports, reviews, and communications in the realms of clinical and basic medicine, as well as pharmacology. The journal spans various fields, including Cancer, Nutriceutics, Neurodegenerative, Cardiac, and Infectious Diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信