伽马角在伽玛刀治疗前庭神经鞘瘤中的作用:回顾性研究。

IF 0.7 Q4 SURGERY
Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT Pub Date : 2021-01-01
Ngangom Robert, Manjul Tripathi, Budhi Singh Yadav
{"title":"伽马角在伽玛刀治疗前庭神经鞘瘤中的作用:回顾性研究。","authors":"Ngangom Robert,&nbsp;Manjul Tripathi,&nbsp;Budhi Singh Yadav","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gamma angle plays a major role in Gamma Knife Radiosurgery (GKRS) treatment planning. Selecting an appropriate gamma angle may help in mitigating unnecessary radiation exposure to organs at risk (OARs). The aims in GKRS of vestibular schwannoma (VS) is to deliver sufficient radiation to the tumor extending into internal auditory canal (IAC) while keeping basal turn of cochlea and brain stem away from 4 and 12 Gy radiation exposure, respectively. This study analyses the optimal gamma angle in GKRS for VS treatment planning. The study was performed using old MRI datasets of 16 patients of VS in Leksell GammaPlan version 10.1.1. T2 weighted contrast MRIs were used for the planning purposes. Three different plans were made for each patient at gamma angles 90°, 110° and 70° using hybrid inverse planning technique. Dynamic shaping was used to achieve as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) doses to the cochlea without compromising target coverage (i.e. coverage of more than 97% of tumor volume). This comparative analysis shows minimal radiation exposure to cochlea for plans made at gamma angle 110° compared to 90° and 70°. Average percentage volume of cochlea receiving 4 Gy were 9.63 ± 12.32%, 6.19 ± 8.24%, and 25.25 ± 31.82% at gamma angles 90°, 110° and 70°, respectively (one-way ANOVA p = 0.0247). The average selectivity indices were 83.44 ± 7.13, 84.06 ± 7.84 and 83.56 ± 7.22 at gamma angles 90°, 110° and 70° respectively. Similarly, the gradient indices and beam on time were 2.80 ± 0.23, 2.81 ± 0.23 and 2.80 ± 0.25 and 120.65 ± 59.63, 117.95 ± 58.06 and 123.99 ± 61.61 min, respectively, at 90°, 110° and 70°. The selectivity index, gradient index and beam on time were minimal at gamma angle 110° compared to the other two angles, but not statistically significant (one-way ANOVA p-values were 0.9686, 0.9942 and 0.9598, respectively). The gamma angle of 110° is a good choice for treatment planning of VS patient in Gamma Knife as it gives better treatment plans (minimal cochlea doses).</p>","PeriodicalId":16917,"journal":{"name":"Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT","volume":"7 4","pages":"335-339"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8492045/pdf/rsbrt-7-339.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of gamma angle in treatment planning of vestibular schwannoma in Gamma Knife: A retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Ngangom Robert,&nbsp;Manjul Tripathi,&nbsp;Budhi Singh Yadav\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Gamma angle plays a major role in Gamma Knife Radiosurgery (GKRS) treatment planning. Selecting an appropriate gamma angle may help in mitigating unnecessary radiation exposure to organs at risk (OARs). The aims in GKRS of vestibular schwannoma (VS) is to deliver sufficient radiation to the tumor extending into internal auditory canal (IAC) while keeping basal turn of cochlea and brain stem away from 4 and 12 Gy radiation exposure, respectively. This study analyses the optimal gamma angle in GKRS for VS treatment planning. The study was performed using old MRI datasets of 16 patients of VS in Leksell GammaPlan version 10.1.1. T2 weighted contrast MRIs were used for the planning purposes. Three different plans were made for each patient at gamma angles 90°, 110° and 70° using hybrid inverse planning technique. Dynamic shaping was used to achieve as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) doses to the cochlea without compromising target coverage (i.e. coverage of more than 97% of tumor volume). This comparative analysis shows minimal radiation exposure to cochlea for plans made at gamma angle 110° compared to 90° and 70°. Average percentage volume of cochlea receiving 4 Gy were 9.63 ± 12.32%, 6.19 ± 8.24%, and 25.25 ± 31.82% at gamma angles 90°, 110° and 70°, respectively (one-way ANOVA p = 0.0247). The average selectivity indices were 83.44 ± 7.13, 84.06 ± 7.84 and 83.56 ± 7.22 at gamma angles 90°, 110° and 70° respectively. Similarly, the gradient indices and beam on time were 2.80 ± 0.23, 2.81 ± 0.23 and 2.80 ± 0.25 and 120.65 ± 59.63, 117.95 ± 58.06 and 123.99 ± 61.61 min, respectively, at 90°, 110° and 70°. The selectivity index, gradient index and beam on time were minimal at gamma angle 110° compared to the other two angles, but not statistically significant (one-way ANOVA p-values were 0.9686, 0.9942 and 0.9598, respectively). The gamma angle of 110° is a good choice for treatment planning of VS patient in Gamma Knife as it gives better treatment plans (minimal cochlea doses).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16917,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT\",\"volume\":\"7 4\",\"pages\":\"335-339\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8492045/pdf/rsbrt-7-339.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

伽马角在伽玛刀放射外科(GKRS)治疗计划中起着重要作用。选择合适的伽马角可能有助于减轻对危险器官的不必要辐射暴露。前庭神经鞘瘤(VS) GKRS的目的是向肿瘤内耳道(IAC)提供足够的辐射,同时使耳蜗基底部和脑干分别远离4 Gy和12 Gy的辐射照射。本研究分析了GKRS的最佳伽玛角,用于VS治疗计划。本研究使用Leksell GammaPlan 10.1.1版本的16例VS患者的旧MRI数据集进行。T2加权对比mri用于计划目的。使用混合逆计划技术为每位患者在90°、110°和70°伽马角处制定三种不同的计划。动态整形用于在不影响靶覆盖率(即肿瘤体积97%以上的覆盖率)的情况下达到尽可能低的合理可达(ALARA)耳蜗剂量。本对比分析显示,与90°和70°伽马角相比,110°平面图对耳蜗的辐射暴露最小。在90°、110°和70°伽马角下,接受4 Gy的耳蜗平均体积百分比分别为9.63±12.32%、6.19±8.24%和25.25±31.82%(单因素方差分析p = 0.0247)。在90°、110°和70°伽马角下,平均选择性指数分别为83.44±7.13、84.06±7.84和83.56±7.22。同样,在90°、110°和70°时,梯度指数和光束时间分别为2.80±0.23、2.81±0.23和2.80±0.25和120.65±59.63、117.95±58.06和123.99±61.61 min。伽玛角110°时的选择性指数、梯度指数和光束到达时间最小,但差异无统计学意义(单因素方差分析p值分别为0.9686、0.9942和0.9598)。伽玛刀治疗VS患者时,110°的伽玛刀角度是一个很好的选择,因为它提供了更好的治疗方案(最小的耳蜗剂量)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Role of gamma angle in treatment planning of vestibular schwannoma in Gamma Knife: A retrospective study.

Gamma angle plays a major role in Gamma Knife Radiosurgery (GKRS) treatment planning. Selecting an appropriate gamma angle may help in mitigating unnecessary radiation exposure to organs at risk (OARs). The aims in GKRS of vestibular schwannoma (VS) is to deliver sufficient radiation to the tumor extending into internal auditory canal (IAC) while keeping basal turn of cochlea and brain stem away from 4 and 12 Gy radiation exposure, respectively. This study analyses the optimal gamma angle in GKRS for VS treatment planning. The study was performed using old MRI datasets of 16 patients of VS in Leksell GammaPlan version 10.1.1. T2 weighted contrast MRIs were used for the planning purposes. Three different plans were made for each patient at gamma angles 90°, 110° and 70° using hybrid inverse planning technique. Dynamic shaping was used to achieve as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) doses to the cochlea without compromising target coverage (i.e. coverage of more than 97% of tumor volume). This comparative analysis shows minimal radiation exposure to cochlea for plans made at gamma angle 110° compared to 90° and 70°. Average percentage volume of cochlea receiving 4 Gy were 9.63 ± 12.32%, 6.19 ± 8.24%, and 25.25 ± 31.82% at gamma angles 90°, 110° and 70°, respectively (one-way ANOVA p = 0.0247). The average selectivity indices were 83.44 ± 7.13, 84.06 ± 7.84 and 83.56 ± 7.22 at gamma angles 90°, 110° and 70° respectively. Similarly, the gradient indices and beam on time were 2.80 ± 0.23, 2.81 ± 0.23 and 2.80 ± 0.25 and 120.65 ± 59.63, 117.95 ± 58.06 and 123.99 ± 61.61 min, respectively, at 90°, 110° and 70°. The selectivity index, gradient index and beam on time were minimal at gamma angle 110° compared to the other two angles, but not statistically significant (one-way ANOVA p-values were 0.9686, 0.9942 and 0.9598, respectively). The gamma angle of 110° is a good choice for treatment planning of VS patient in Gamma Knife as it gives better treatment plans (minimal cochlea doses).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信