评估肩部位置变化对脊柱SBRT转移到下颈椎区的靶覆盖的剂量学影响。

IF 0.7 Q4 SURGERY
Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT Pub Date : 2021-01-01
Vikren Sarkar, Shane Lloyd, Adam Paxton, Christian Dial, Prema Rassiah, Martin W Szegedi, Ying J Hitchcock, Bill J Salter
{"title":"评估肩部位置变化对脊柱SBRT转移到下颈椎区的靶覆盖的剂量学影响。","authors":"Vikren Sarkar,&nbsp;Shane Lloyd,&nbsp;Adam Paxton,&nbsp;Christian Dial,&nbsp;Prema Rassiah,&nbsp;Martin W Szegedi,&nbsp;Ying J Hitchcock,&nbsp;Bill J Salter","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For patients treated with SBRT for spinal metastases in the cervical area, a thermoplastic mask is the usual immobilization technique. This project investigates the impact of shoulder position variability on target coverage for such cases. Eight HN patients treated in a suite equipped with a CT-on-rails system (CTOR) were randomly chosen. Of these, three were treated with shoulder depressors. For each patient, their planning CT was used to contour spine targets at the C5, C6 and C7 levels for which two VMAT plans were developed to deliver 18 Gy to each target per the RTOG 0631 protocol. One plan used full arcs while the other used avoidance sectors around the lateral positions. For each patient, IGRT CTOR images were used to recalculate doses that would have been delivered from these plans. Target coverage and dose to the spinal cord were compared for four scenarios: full and partial arcs, with or without depressors. A Dunn test showed significant differences between groups with and without shoulder depressors, but not between those with full versus partial arcs. For most of the investigated cases, the coverage ended up being higher than planned due to the shoulder position being inferior at treatment compared to simulation. In some cases, this led to higher spinal cord doses than allowed per protocol. The results of this study confirm that, when treating lower cervical spine lesions with SBRT, special care should be taken to ensure that the shoulders are positioned as they were during planning CT acquisition.</p>","PeriodicalId":16917,"journal":{"name":"Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT","volume":"7 4","pages":"321-328"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8492048/pdf/rsbrt-7-328.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the dosimetric impact of changes in shoulder position on target coverage for spine SBRT to metastases in the lower cervical spine region.\",\"authors\":\"Vikren Sarkar,&nbsp;Shane Lloyd,&nbsp;Adam Paxton,&nbsp;Christian Dial,&nbsp;Prema Rassiah,&nbsp;Martin W Szegedi,&nbsp;Ying J Hitchcock,&nbsp;Bill J Salter\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>For patients treated with SBRT for spinal metastases in the cervical area, a thermoplastic mask is the usual immobilization technique. This project investigates the impact of shoulder position variability on target coverage for such cases. Eight HN patients treated in a suite equipped with a CT-on-rails system (CTOR) were randomly chosen. Of these, three were treated with shoulder depressors. For each patient, their planning CT was used to contour spine targets at the C5, C6 and C7 levels for which two VMAT plans were developed to deliver 18 Gy to each target per the RTOG 0631 protocol. One plan used full arcs while the other used avoidance sectors around the lateral positions. For each patient, IGRT CTOR images were used to recalculate doses that would have been delivered from these plans. Target coverage and dose to the spinal cord were compared for four scenarios: full and partial arcs, with or without depressors. A Dunn test showed significant differences between groups with and without shoulder depressors, but not between those with full versus partial arcs. For most of the investigated cases, the coverage ended up being higher than planned due to the shoulder position being inferior at treatment compared to simulation. In some cases, this led to higher spinal cord doses than allowed per protocol. The results of this study confirm that, when treating lower cervical spine lesions with SBRT, special care should be taken to ensure that the shoulders are positioned as they were during planning CT acquisition.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16917,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT\",\"volume\":\"7 4\",\"pages\":\"321-328\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8492048/pdf/rsbrt-7-328.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于接受SBRT治疗颈椎区域脊柱转移的患者,热塑性口罩是常用的固定技术。本项目调查了这种情况下肩部位置变化对目标覆盖的影响。随机选择8名HN患者在配备CT-on-rails系统(CTOR)的套件中接受治疗。其中,三人接受了肩部降压药治疗。对于每位患者,他们的计划CT用于轮廓C5, C6和C7水平的脊柱目标,并根据RTOG 0631方案制定了两个VMAT计划,向每个目标提供18 Gy。一种方案使用了完整的弧线,而另一种方案则在横向位置周围使用了避让扇形。对于每个患者,使用IGRT CTOR图像来重新计算这些计划可能提供的剂量。脊髓靶覆盖范围和剂量在四种情况下进行了比较:完全弧线和部分弧线,有或没有抑制剂。一项Dunn测试显示,在使用和不使用肩部抑制剂的组之间存在显著差异,但在完全弧度和部分弧度之间没有差异。对于大多数被调查的病例,由于肩部位置在治疗上不如模拟,覆盖范围最终高于计划。在某些情况下,这导致脊髓剂量高于每个方案允许的剂量。本研究的结果证实,在使用SBRT治疗下颈椎病变时,应特别注意确保肩部与计划CT采集时的位置一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the dosimetric impact of changes in shoulder position on target coverage for spine SBRT to metastases in the lower cervical spine region.

For patients treated with SBRT for spinal metastases in the cervical area, a thermoplastic mask is the usual immobilization technique. This project investigates the impact of shoulder position variability on target coverage for such cases. Eight HN patients treated in a suite equipped with a CT-on-rails system (CTOR) were randomly chosen. Of these, three were treated with shoulder depressors. For each patient, their planning CT was used to contour spine targets at the C5, C6 and C7 levels for which two VMAT plans were developed to deliver 18 Gy to each target per the RTOG 0631 protocol. One plan used full arcs while the other used avoidance sectors around the lateral positions. For each patient, IGRT CTOR images were used to recalculate doses that would have been delivered from these plans. Target coverage and dose to the spinal cord were compared for four scenarios: full and partial arcs, with or without depressors. A Dunn test showed significant differences between groups with and without shoulder depressors, but not between those with full versus partial arcs. For most of the investigated cases, the coverage ended up being higher than planned due to the shoulder position being inferior at treatment compared to simulation. In some cases, this led to higher spinal cord doses than allowed per protocol. The results of this study confirm that, when treating lower cervical spine lesions with SBRT, special care should be taken to ensure that the shoulders are positioned as they were during planning CT acquisition.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信