欧洲的关键工人:COVID-19期间中欧和东欧的移民和大流行政治

IF 2.7 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Ruxandra Paul PhD, BA
{"title":"欧洲的关键工人:COVID-19期间中欧和东欧的移民和大流行政治","authors":"Ruxandra Paul PhD, BA","doi":"10.1002/epa2.1105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract How do countries navigate the tradeoffs between public health and economic reopening? What explains variation in state responses to COVID‐19? Historically, governments have tackled pandemics as external, nonconventional security threats, restricting immigration to protect citizens from contagious outsiders. Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries could not frame COVID‐19 this way because European integration and free‐movement migration blur the line between insiders and outsiders. This article examines the conditions and coalitions that shaped policy outcomes, and argues that migration systems played a double role in policy change: as structures for policy diffusion and as venues for migrants’ agency. Governments learned from one another's experiences, but diffusion occurred unevenly according to countries’ position within migratory systems.","PeriodicalId":52190,"journal":{"name":"European Policy Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/epa2.1105","citationCount":"29","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Europe’s essential workers: Migration and pandemic politics in Central and Eastern Europe during COVID-19\",\"authors\":\"Ruxandra Paul PhD, BA\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/epa2.1105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract How do countries navigate the tradeoffs between public health and economic reopening? What explains variation in state responses to COVID‐19? Historically, governments have tackled pandemics as external, nonconventional security threats, restricting immigration to protect citizens from contagious outsiders. Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries could not frame COVID‐19 this way because European integration and free‐movement migration blur the line between insiders and outsiders. This article examines the conditions and coalitions that shaped policy outcomes, and argues that migration systems played a double role in policy change: as structures for policy diffusion and as venues for migrants’ agency. Governments learned from one another's experiences, but diffusion occurred unevenly according to countries’ position within migratory systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Policy Analysis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/epa2.1105\",\"citationCount\":\"29\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Policy Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/epa2.1105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Policy Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/epa2.1105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

摘要

各国如何在公共卫生和经济重新开放之间进行权衡?如何解释各州对COVID-19的反应差异?从历史上看,各国政府一直将流行病视为外部的、非常规的安全威胁,限制移民以保护公民免受外来者的感染。中欧和东欧国家无法以这种方式定义新冠肺炎,因为欧洲一体化和自由流动的移民模糊了内部和外部之间的界限。本文考察了形成政策结果的条件和联盟,并认为移民制度在政策变化中发挥了双重作用:作为政策扩散的结构和移民代理的场所。各国政府从彼此的经验中学习,但根据各国在移徙系统中的地位,扩散的情况并不均衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Europe’s essential workers: Migration and pandemic politics in Central and Eastern Europe during COVID-19
Abstract How do countries navigate the tradeoffs between public health and economic reopening? What explains variation in state responses to COVID‐19? Historically, governments have tackled pandemics as external, nonconventional security threats, restricting immigration to protect citizens from contagious outsiders. Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries could not frame COVID‐19 this way because European integration and free‐movement migration blur the line between insiders and outsiders. This article examines the conditions and coalitions that shaped policy outcomes, and argues that migration systems played a double role in policy change: as structures for policy diffusion and as venues for migrants’ agency. Governments learned from one another's experiences, but diffusion occurred unevenly according to countries’ position within migratory systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Policy Analysis
European Policy Analysis Social Sciences-Public Administration
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信