Mikako Warren, Nishant Tiwari, Sabrina Sy, Gordana Raca, Ryan J Schmidt, Bruce Pawel
{"title":"PLAG1免疫组织化学染色是脂肪母细胞瘤中PLAG1融合的替代标志物。","authors":"Mikako Warren, Nishant Tiwari, Sabrina Sy, Gordana Raca, Ryan J Schmidt, Bruce Pawel","doi":"10.1177/10935266211043366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The hallmark of lipoblastoma is a PLAG1 fusion. PLAG1 protein overexpression has been reported in sporadic PLAG1-rearranged lipoblastomas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated the utility of PLAG1 immunohistochemical staining (IHC) in 34 pediatric lipomatous tumors, correlating the results with histology and conventional cytogenetics, FISH and/or next generation sequencing (NGS) results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 24 lipoblastomas, divided into 2 groups designated as \"Lipoblastoma 1\" with both lipoblastoma histology and PLAG1 rearrangement (n = 16) and \"Lipoblastoma 2\" with lipoblastoma histology but without PLAG1 cytogenetic rearrangement (n = 8), and 10 lipomas with neither lipoblastoma histology nor a PLAG1 rearrangement. Using the presence of a fusion as the \"gold standard\" for diagnosing lipoblastoma (Lipoblastoma 1), the sensitivity of PLAG1 IHC was 94%. Using histologic features alone (Lipoblastoma 1 + 2), the sensitivity was 96%. Specificity, as defined by the ability to distinguish lipoma from lipoblastoma, was 100%, as there were no false positives in the lipoma group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cytogenetics/molecular testing is expensive and may not be ideal for detecting PLAG1 fusions because PLAG1 fusions are often cytogenetically cryptic and NGS panels may not include all partner genes. PLAG1 IHC is an inexpensive surrogate marker of PLAG1 fusions and may be useful in distinguishing lipoblastomas from lipomas.</p>","PeriodicalId":520743,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric and developmental pathology : the official journal of the Society for Pediatric Pathology and the Paediatric Pathology Society","volume":" ","pages":"134-140"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PLAG1 Immunohistochemical Staining Is a Surrogate Marker for <i>PLAG1</i> Fusions in Lipoblastomas.\",\"authors\":\"Mikako Warren, Nishant Tiwari, Sabrina Sy, Gordana Raca, Ryan J Schmidt, Bruce Pawel\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10935266211043366\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The hallmark of lipoblastoma is a PLAG1 fusion. PLAG1 protein overexpression has been reported in sporadic PLAG1-rearranged lipoblastomas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated the utility of PLAG1 immunohistochemical staining (IHC) in 34 pediatric lipomatous tumors, correlating the results with histology and conventional cytogenetics, FISH and/or next generation sequencing (NGS) results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 24 lipoblastomas, divided into 2 groups designated as \\\"Lipoblastoma 1\\\" with both lipoblastoma histology and PLAG1 rearrangement (n = 16) and \\\"Lipoblastoma 2\\\" with lipoblastoma histology but without PLAG1 cytogenetic rearrangement (n = 8), and 10 lipomas with neither lipoblastoma histology nor a PLAG1 rearrangement. Using the presence of a fusion as the \\\"gold standard\\\" for diagnosing lipoblastoma (Lipoblastoma 1), the sensitivity of PLAG1 IHC was 94%. Using histologic features alone (Lipoblastoma 1 + 2), the sensitivity was 96%. Specificity, as defined by the ability to distinguish lipoma from lipoblastoma, was 100%, as there were no false positives in the lipoma group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cytogenetics/molecular testing is expensive and may not be ideal for detecting PLAG1 fusions because PLAG1 fusions are often cytogenetically cryptic and NGS panels may not include all partner genes. PLAG1 IHC is an inexpensive surrogate marker of PLAG1 fusions and may be useful in distinguishing lipoblastomas from lipomas.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520743,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric and developmental pathology : the official journal of the Society for Pediatric Pathology and the Paediatric Pathology Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"134-140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric and developmental pathology : the official journal of the Society for Pediatric Pathology and the Paediatric Pathology Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10935266211043366\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/10/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric and developmental pathology : the official journal of the Society for Pediatric Pathology and the Paediatric Pathology Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10935266211043366","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
PLAG1 Immunohistochemical Staining Is a Surrogate Marker for PLAG1 Fusions in Lipoblastomas.
Background: The hallmark of lipoblastoma is a PLAG1 fusion. PLAG1 protein overexpression has been reported in sporadic PLAG1-rearranged lipoblastomas.
Methods: We evaluated the utility of PLAG1 immunohistochemical staining (IHC) in 34 pediatric lipomatous tumors, correlating the results with histology and conventional cytogenetics, FISH and/or next generation sequencing (NGS) results.
Results: The study included 24 lipoblastomas, divided into 2 groups designated as "Lipoblastoma 1" with both lipoblastoma histology and PLAG1 rearrangement (n = 16) and "Lipoblastoma 2" with lipoblastoma histology but without PLAG1 cytogenetic rearrangement (n = 8), and 10 lipomas with neither lipoblastoma histology nor a PLAG1 rearrangement. Using the presence of a fusion as the "gold standard" for diagnosing lipoblastoma (Lipoblastoma 1), the sensitivity of PLAG1 IHC was 94%. Using histologic features alone (Lipoblastoma 1 + 2), the sensitivity was 96%. Specificity, as defined by the ability to distinguish lipoma from lipoblastoma, was 100%, as there were no false positives in the lipoma group.
Conclusions: Cytogenetics/molecular testing is expensive and may not be ideal for detecting PLAG1 fusions because PLAG1 fusions are often cytogenetically cryptic and NGS panels may not include all partner genes. PLAG1 IHC is an inexpensive surrogate marker of PLAG1 fusions and may be useful in distinguishing lipoblastomas from lipomas.