头颈癌幸存者的社会功能、抑郁和生活质量标记之间的关联:头颈癌5000研究的发现

Psycho-Oncology Pub Date : 2022-03-01 Epub Date: 2021-09-30 DOI:10.1002/pon.5830
Joanne M Patterson, Liya Lu, Laura-Jayne Watson, Sam Harding, Andy R Ness, Steve Thomas, Andrea Waylen, Miranda Pring, Tim Waterboer, Linda Sharp
{"title":"头颈癌幸存者的社会功能、抑郁和生活质量标记之间的关联:头颈癌5000研究的发现","authors":"Joanne M Patterson,&nbsp;Liya Lu,&nbsp;Laura-Jayne Watson,&nbsp;Sam Harding,&nbsp;Andy R Ness,&nbsp;Steve Thomas,&nbsp;Andrea Waylen,&nbsp;Miranda Pring,&nbsp;Tim Waterboer,&nbsp;Linda Sharp","doi":"10.1002/pon.5830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate associations between markers of social functioning (trouble with social eating and social contact), depression and health-related quality of life (QOL) among head and neck cancer survivors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional analysis included individuals with oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx, salivary gland and thyroid cancers from Head and Neck 5000 alive at 12 months. Trouble with social eating and social contact were measured using items from EORTC QLQ-H&N35 and QOL using EORTC QLQ-C30; responses were converted into a score of 0-100, with a higher score equalling more trouble or better QOL. A HADS subscale score of ≥8 was considered significant depression. Associations between tertiles of trouble with social eating and social contact and depression and QoL were assessed using multivariable logistic and linear regression (with robust errors), respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2561 survivors, 23% reported significant depression. The median QOL score was 75.0 (interquartile range 58.3-83.3). For trouble with social eating, after confounder adjustment, those in the intermediate and highest tertiles had higher odds of depression (intermediate: OR = 4.5, 95% CI 3.19-6.45; high: OR = 21.8, 15.17-31.18) and lower QOL (intermediate:β = -8.7, 95% CI -10.35 to -7.14; high: β = -24.8, -26.91 to -22.77). Results were similar for trouble with social contact.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found strong clinically important associations between markers of social functioning and depression and QOL. More effective interventions addressing social eating and contact are required. These may help survivors regain their independence, reduce levels of isolation and loneliness, and depression, and improve QOL outcomes generally.</p>","PeriodicalId":516935,"journal":{"name":"Psycho-Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"478-485"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associations between markers of social functioning and depression and quality of life in survivors of head and neck cancer: Findings from the Head and Neck Cancer 5000 study.\",\"authors\":\"Joanne M Patterson,&nbsp;Liya Lu,&nbsp;Laura-Jayne Watson,&nbsp;Sam Harding,&nbsp;Andy R Ness,&nbsp;Steve Thomas,&nbsp;Andrea Waylen,&nbsp;Miranda Pring,&nbsp;Tim Waterboer,&nbsp;Linda Sharp\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pon.5830\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate associations between markers of social functioning (trouble with social eating and social contact), depression and health-related quality of life (QOL) among head and neck cancer survivors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional analysis included individuals with oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx, salivary gland and thyroid cancers from Head and Neck 5000 alive at 12 months. Trouble with social eating and social contact were measured using items from EORTC QLQ-H&N35 and QOL using EORTC QLQ-C30; responses were converted into a score of 0-100, with a higher score equalling more trouble or better QOL. A HADS subscale score of ≥8 was considered significant depression. Associations between tertiles of trouble with social eating and social contact and depression and QoL were assessed using multivariable logistic and linear regression (with robust errors), respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2561 survivors, 23% reported significant depression. The median QOL score was 75.0 (interquartile range 58.3-83.3). For trouble with social eating, after confounder adjustment, those in the intermediate and highest tertiles had higher odds of depression (intermediate: OR = 4.5, 95% CI 3.19-6.45; high: OR = 21.8, 15.17-31.18) and lower QOL (intermediate:β = -8.7, 95% CI -10.35 to -7.14; high: β = -24.8, -26.91 to -22.77). Results were similar for trouble with social contact.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found strong clinically important associations between markers of social functioning and depression and QOL. More effective interventions addressing social eating and contact are required. These may help survivors regain their independence, reduce levels of isolation and loneliness, and depression, and improve QOL outcomes generally.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":516935,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psycho-Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"478-485\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psycho-Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5830\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/9/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycho-Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5830","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

目的:探讨头颈癌幸存者社会功能指标(社交饮食和社交障碍)、抑郁和健康相关生活质量(QOL)之间的关系。方法:本横断面分析包括在12个月内存活的头颈部5000例口腔、口咽、喉部、唾液腺和甲状腺癌患者。使用EORTC QLQ-H&N35和EORTC QLQ-C30量表分别测量社交饮食和社交障碍;回答被转换成0-100分的分数,分数越高表示麻烦越多或生活质量越好。HADS亚量表得分≥8分被认为是显著抑郁。社交饮食问题和社交接触、抑郁和生活质量的分位数之间的关联分别使用多变量逻辑回归和线性回归(具有稳健误差)进行评估。结果:在2561名幸存者中,23%的人报告有明显的抑郁症。中位生活质量评分为75.0(四分位数范围为58.3-83.3)。对于社交饮食方面的问题,经过混杂因素调整后,处于中间和最高三分位数的人患抑郁症的几率更高(中间:OR = 4.5, 95% CI 3.19-6.45;高:OR = 21.8, 15.17-31.18)和较低的生活质量(中间:β = -8.7, 95% CI -10.35 ~ -7.14;高:β = -24.8, -26.91至-22.77)。社交方面的问题也有类似的结果。结论:我们发现社会功能指标与抑郁和生活质量之间有很强的临床意义。需要采取更有效的干预措施解决社交饮食和接触问题。这些可以帮助幸存者重新获得独立性,减少孤立、孤独和抑郁的程度,并总体上改善生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Associations between markers of social functioning and depression and quality of life in survivors of head and neck cancer: Findings from the Head and Neck Cancer 5000 study.

Objective: To investigate associations between markers of social functioning (trouble with social eating and social contact), depression and health-related quality of life (QOL) among head and neck cancer survivors.

Methods: This cross-sectional analysis included individuals with oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx, salivary gland and thyroid cancers from Head and Neck 5000 alive at 12 months. Trouble with social eating and social contact were measured using items from EORTC QLQ-H&N35 and QOL using EORTC QLQ-C30; responses were converted into a score of 0-100, with a higher score equalling more trouble or better QOL. A HADS subscale score of ≥8 was considered significant depression. Associations between tertiles of trouble with social eating and social contact and depression and QoL were assessed using multivariable logistic and linear regression (with robust errors), respectively.

Results: Of 2561 survivors, 23% reported significant depression. The median QOL score was 75.0 (interquartile range 58.3-83.3). For trouble with social eating, after confounder adjustment, those in the intermediate and highest tertiles had higher odds of depression (intermediate: OR = 4.5, 95% CI 3.19-6.45; high: OR = 21.8, 15.17-31.18) and lower QOL (intermediate:β = -8.7, 95% CI -10.35 to -7.14; high: β = -24.8, -26.91 to -22.77). Results were similar for trouble with social contact.

Conclusion: We found strong clinically important associations between markers of social functioning and depression and QOL. More effective interventions addressing social eating and contact are required. These may help survivors regain their independence, reduce levels of isolation and loneliness, and depression, and improve QOL outcomes generally.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信